Table V. Results of stability assessment.14,35,40,43,46,49.
| Author and year | Method | Gap (mm) | Revision for TFJI | Revision for PFJI | Patella instability rate | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEG | LEG | MFG | LFG | ||||||
| Dossett 201435 | Kinematic + PSI | 0% | |||||||
| Mechanical | 2,3% | ||||||||
| Calliess 201714 | Kinematic + PSI | 2% | |||||||
| Mechanical | 1% | ||||||||
| Young 201740 | Kinematic + PSI | 2% | 2% | ||||||
| Navigated mechanical | 2% | 2% | |||||||
| McEwen 202043 | Functional | 1 | 1,1 | 3,2 | 3,5 | ||||
| Mechanical | 1,1 | 1,3 | 3,2 | 3,6 | |||||
| Jeremić 202046 | Kinematic | 0% | 0% | ||||||
| Mechanical | 0% | 0% | |||||||
| Abhari 202149 | Restricted kinematic | 0% | 0% | ||||||
| Mechanical | 0,9% | 0,9% | |||||||
Note: “MEG”: medial extension gap; “LEG”: lateral extension gap; “MFG”: medial flexion gap; “LFG”: lateral flexion gap; “TFJI”: tibiofemoral joint instability; “PFJI”: patellofemoral joint instability.