Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 2;52(3):1143–1151. doi: 10.1007/s15010-023-02171-z

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Comparison of humoral immunity following infection between UV, VNR, and VR. AD Patient sera were analyzed for NAB, anti-N- and anti-S-antibodies as well as anti-S-antibody avidity. Bar and whiskers mark the mean with standard error. Sera of UV (n = 13), VNR (n = 34), and VR (n = 40) were compared. Statistical analysis was performed via the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn's correction. ****p < 0.0001, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, n.s. not significant. A VR (mean = 13; SEM =  ± 2); VNR (mean = 11; SEM =  ± 5); UV (mean = 42; SEM =  ± 14); VR vs. VNR (p = 0.0005); VR vs. UV (p =  > 0.999); VNR vs. UV (p = 0.0086). B VR (mean = 711; SEM =  ± 37); VNR (mean = 283; SEM =  ± 63); UV (mean = 234; SEM =  ± 95); VR vs. VNR (p =  < 0.0001); VR vs. UV (p =  < 0.0001); VNR vs. UV (p = 0.64). C VR (mean = 25,446; SEM =  ± 2370); VNR (mean = 7930; SEM =  ± 1588); UV (mean = 4180; SEM =  ± 940); VR vs. VNR (p =  < 0.0001); VR vs. UV (p =  < 0.0001); VNR vs. UV (p = 0.719). D VR (mean = 78; SEM =  ± 2); VNR (mean = 42; SEM =  ± 3); UV (mean = 61; SEM =  ± 4); VR vs. VNR (p =  < 0.0001); VR vs. UV (p = 0.0016); VNR vs. UV (p =  > 0.999)