Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 19;88(4):1092–1114. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01924-7

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics of the heterogeneous measurement scores

Task name Measurement score Mean SD Reliability
Negative priming task RT difference 0.02 0.02 0.28a
Flanker task RT difference 0.03 0.02 0.66a
Stroop task RT difference 0.11 0.06 0.77a
Negative priming task, priming cond RT 0.61 0.11 0.99a
Flanker task, incong. cond RT 0.50 0.08 0.99a
Stroop task, incong. cond RT 0.82 0.14 0.98a
Keep track task, updating cond

a. t. proportion correct

(percent correct)

1.29

(91.40)

0.11

(6.38)

0.57a
Running span task, updating cond

a. t. proportion correct

(percent correct)

1.28

(90.99)

0.08

(4.85)

0.64a
N-back task

a. t. proportion correct

(percent correct)

1.21

(86.29)

0.13

(8.64)

0.85a
Number letter task RT difference 0.06 0.07 0.68a
Switching task RT difference 0.05 0.06 0.45a
Global local task RT difference 0.09 0.07 0.41a
Two choice RT task RT 0.38 0.04 0.99a
Sternberg task RT 0.91 0.22 0.98a
Posner task RT 0.71 0.13 0.99a
Memory updating Percent correct 63 20 0.88b
Binding Percent correct 86 11 0.82b
Operation span Percent correct 78 13 0.89b
Sentence span Percent correct 84 11 0.87b
BIS-PC Scales-scores 101.61 7.12 0.75b
BIS-PS Scales-scores 101.14 7.15 0.49b
BIS-M Scales-scores 98.59 7.16 0.58b
BIS-C Scales-scores 98.15 6.97 0.45b

Note. Heterogeneous measurement scores; a. t. = arcsine-transformed; BIS-PC = processing capacity scale of the Berlin Intelligence Structure Test; BIS-PS = processing speed scale of the Berlin Intelligence Structure Test; BIS-M = memory scale of the Berlin Intelligence Structure Test; BIS-C = creativity scale of the Berlin Intelligence Structure Test

aReliability estimates are based on Spearman–Brown corrected odd–even split correlations

bReliability estimates are based on Cronbach’s α; RT-values are displayed in seconds; proportion correct = arcsine-transformed proportion correct scores