Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 26;8(4):102421. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102421

Table 3.

Quantitative endpoints.

Endpoint Overall n/N, % (95% CI) Clinician-level interventions
Patient-level interventions
CN n/N (%) CN+NF n/N (%) Odds ratio (95% CI)a Usual care n/N (%) Patient activation n/N (%) Odds ratio (95% CI)a
Primary endpoint
Completion of week 5 assessment 35/47, 74.5 (58.6, 85.7) 15/24 (62.5) 20/23 (87.0) 4.03 (1.03,15.72) 19/26 (73.1) 16/21 (76.2) 1.24 (0.12, 12.73)
Secondary endpoint
Receipt of both assigned interventions 47/47, 100 (-c) 24/24 (100) 23/23 (100) -c 26/26 (100) 21/21 (100) -c
Exploratory endpoints
Initiation of either a PPI or discontinuation of all antiplatelet therapy at week 5 as determined by patient interview (Note: denominator is restricted to patients who completed week 5 assessment and reported using an antiplatelet medication at baseline without a PPI, n = 29) 11/29, 37.9 (16.9, 64.7) 4/11 (36.4) 7/18 (38.9) 0.91 (0.13, 6.3) 7/18 (38.9) 4/11 (36.4) 1.10 (0.24, 5.1)
Intervention fidelity, defined as receipt of intervention strategies as assigned within the appropriate week and with the correct clinician recipient 47/47, 100 (1, 1) 24/24 (100) 23/23 (100) -c 26/26 (100) 21/21 (100) -c
Patients reached by phone within 3 attempts at week 5 37/47, 78.7 (64.1, 88.5) 17/24 (70.8) 20/23 (87.0) 2.87 (0.65, 12.7) 19/26 (73.1) 18/21 (85.7) 2.34 (0.24, 23.1)
Documentation of a recommendation by one of the patient’s clinicians to discontinue antiplatelet therapy or initiate a PPI as indicated by a clinical documentation or by a change in the EHR medication list, according to chart review 24/47, 51.1 (26.3, 75.4) 9/24 (37.5) 15b/23 (65.2) 3.16 (0.39, 25.4) 15/26 (57.7) 9/21b (42.9) 0.54 (0.20, 1.42)
Concordance of clinicians’ recommendations for medication changes with clinical guidance summary given to cliniciansf(Note: denominator is restricted to patients who had a documented recommendation from a clinician to discontinue antiplatelet therapy or initiate a PPI according to chart review, n = 24) 15/24, 62.5 (0.30, 0.87) 6/9 (66.7) 9/15 (60.0) -b 10/15 (66.7) 5/9 (55.6) -b
The proportion of patients who self-reported communicating about medication optimization with their clinicians based on patient recall at week 5d,e(Note: denominator is restricted to patients who completed week 5 phone assessment, n = 35) 16/35, 45.7 (22.4,71.0) 4/15 (26.7) 12/20 (60.0) -b 10/19 (52.6) 6/16 (37.5) -b
Concordance of medication changes with clinical guidance summary given to clinicians among patients who made a changef(Note: denominator is restricted to patients who completed week 5 assessment and reported using an antiplatelet medication at baseline without a PPI and who reported making a medication change, n = 11) 9/11, 81.8 (0.36, 0.97)b 3/4 (75.0) 6/7 (85.7) -b 5/7 (71.4) 4/4 (100.0) -b

CN, clinician notification; NF, nurse facilitation; PPI, proton pump inhibitor.

a

Estimates of odds ratios for association between intervention group and primary and secondary outcomes were done using generalized linear mixed effects modeling, including effects for the patient-level intervention, the clinician-level intervention, and the interaction term for the 2, as well as random effects for clinician.

b

For excessively small sample sizes, CIs and odds ratios were not displayed because of imprecision and failure of model convergence.

c

CI is not estimable.

d

Denominator excluded patients unable to be reached or who declined to participate in the week 5 assessment.

e

Patients who were uncertain about whether they had communicated with their clinician about a medication change (n = 3) were categorized as “no.”

f

See Supplementary File S1 for clinical guidance summary provided to clinicians.