Table 3.

Analysis of proximal femur anatomic values in respect to stem anteversion: Stem anteversion relationship was statistically significant in respect to all proximal femur anteversion parameters. In the logistic regression no parameter was significantly associated with stem positioning within the 10°–20° of anteversion target (OR Odds Ratio)

				Relationship of proximal femur anteversion with stem version					Probability of stem version 10°–20°
	Mean (°)	SD	Min; Max	Linear Correlation		Linear Regression			Logistic regression
				σ	P	β	R2	P	OR	P
FNV	6.6	8.8	−28; 25	0.39	< 0.001	0.21	15.6%	< 0.001	0.99	0.63
F-PCA	11.2	8.6	−13; 32	0.37	< 0.001	0.20	14.0%	< 0.001	1.02	0.47
F-ACA	6.4	8.8	−26; 26	0.56	< 0.001	0.30	31.8%	< 0.001	0.96	0.16
F-MAA	8.7	7.9	−11; 28	0.52	< 0.001	0.31	27.1%	< 0.001	0.99	0.70
E-PCA	20.7	8.4	4; 45	0.35	< 0.001	0.19	12.0%	< 0.001	1.00	0.92
E-ACA	3.7	9.4	−26; 35	0.52	< 0.001	0.26	26.9%	< 0.001	0.97	0.24
E-MAA	12.1	7.7	−7.5; 40	0.51	< 0.001	0.31	25.8%	< 0.001	0.98	0.47
D-PCA	27.6	8.5	9; 52	0.35	< 0.001	0.19	12.5%	< 0.001	0.99	0.71
D-ACA	3.4	8.9	−24; 34	0.46	< 0.001	0.24	20.8%	< 0.001	0.98	0.44
D-MAA	15.5	7.9	−5; 40	0.44	< 0.001	0.26	19.7%	< 0.001	0.98	0.54