Skip to main content
. 2024 May 6;18(3):308–314. doi: 10.1177/18632521241227803

Table 2.

GQS criteria.

Score Global score description
1 Poor quality, poor flow of the site, most information missing, not at all useful for patients
2 Generally poor quality and poor flow, some information listed but many important topics missing, of very limited use to patients
3 Moderate quality, suboptimal flow, some important information is adequately discussed but others poorly discussed, somewhat useful for patients
4 Good quality and generally good flow, most of the relevant information is listed, but some topics not covered, useful for patients
5 Excellent quality and excellent flow, very useful for patients