Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 21;30(11):2377–2383. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-3436

Table 1.

Patient characteristics.

Characteristics n (%)
Median age (range) 68 (48–94)
Gleason score (n = 42)
 ≤7 15 (35.7)
 8–10 27 (64.3)
Initial diagnosis (n = 42)
 Localized 21 (50.0)
 Metastatic 21 (50.0)
ECOG PS (n = 44)
 0 (fully active) 11 (25.0)
 1 (restricted) 33 (75.0)
Metastatic sites (n = 43)
 2 3 (7.0)
 ≥3 40 (93.0)
Site of disease (n = 43)
 Viscerala 20 (46.5)
 Liver 12 (60.0)
 Lung 9 (45.0)
 Other 3 (15.0)
 Non-visceral 23 (53.5)
Type of progression at trial entry (n = 44)
 PSA-only 4 (9.1)
 Radiographic (by RECIST/PCWG3) ± PSA 40 (90.9)
Baseline Ki-67 expression by IHC (n = 31)
 Low (<20%) 8 (25.8)
 High (≥20%) 23 (74.2)
Prior therapy n (%)
Type of prior therapyb (n = 44)
 Chemotherapy 44 (100)
  Docetaxel 44 (100)
  Cabazitaxel 40 (90.9)
  Carboplatin 2 (4.5)
  Paclitaxel 1 (2.3)
 Novel hormonal agent 44 (100)
  1 37 (84.1)
  2c 7 (15.9)
  Abiraterone 24 (54.5)
  Enzalutamide 24 (54.5)
  Apalutamide 2 (4.5)
  Darolutamide 1 (2.3)
 Radiopharmaceuticals 2 (4.5)
  Radium-223 1 (2.3)
  177Lu-PSMA 1 (2.3)
 Immunotherapy 6 (13.6)
  Pembrolizumab 3 (6.8)
  Atezolizumab 1 (2.3)
  Durvalumab 1 (2.3)
  Ipilimumab 1 (2.3)
  Nivolumab 1 (2.3)
Number of prior therapies for mCRPC (n = 44)
 ≤2 19 (43.2)
 ≥3d 25 (56.8)

Abbreviations: ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; mHSPC, metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer; nmCRPC, nonmetastatic castration–resistant prostate cancer; PCWG3, Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.

aFour patients had both liver and lung lesions.

bPatients may have received multiple prior therapies in any setting, including mHSPC, nmCRPC, or mCRPC.

cOne patient received the two NHAs in combination.

dThree patients had four prior therapies for mCRPC.