Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 3;20(11):e690–e698. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00778

Table 3. Physiological indices of microvascular function according to the different age groups of patients with and without CMD.

No CMD (n=184) CMD (n=121)
Young (n=48) Intermediate (n=93) Elderly (n=43) p-value Young (n=28) Intermediate (n=57) Elderly (n=36) p-value
Age, years 47 (6) 59 (3) 69 (4) 0.001 47 (4) 59 (3) 70 (4) 0.001
Qrest, mL/min 74 (23) 74 (24) 69 (24) 0.40 113 (35) 99 (41) 105 (42) 0.46
Qmax, mL/min 224 (87) 228 (88) 212 (83) 0.18 199 (55) 178 (67) 186 (75) 0.49
CFR 3.2 (0.9) 3.1 (0.9) 3.1 (0.7) 0.41 1.8 (0.4) 1.8 (0.4) 1.8 (0.4) 0.96
Rµ,rest, WU 1,374 (458) 1,381 (406) 1,483 (440) 0.25 920 (301) 1,070 (346) 1,064 (363) 0.12
Rµ,hyp, WU 412 (160) 418 (131) 462 (147) 0.105 460 (126) 538 (184) 551 (168) 0.04
MRR 3.9 (1.0) 3.7 (0.9) 3.5 (0.7) 0.067 2.1 (0.3) 2.1 (0.4) 2.0 (0.4) 0.71
Data are presented as mean (SD). p-values in bold indicate statistical significance. CFR: coronary flow reserve; CMD: coronary microvascular dysfunction; MRR: microvascular resistance reserve; Qmax: hyperaemic absolute coronary flow; Qrest: resting absolute coronary flow; Rµ,hyp: hyperaemic absolute microvascular resistance; Rµ,rest: resting absolute microvascular resistance; SD: standard deviation; WU: Wood units