Table 2.
Comparisons of this study with other studies reporting the size of PM accumulating on leaf surfaces.
| Study area | Method | Size fractions | Reference | 
|---|---|---|---|
| An arboretum in Shanghai, China | Sweep-resuspension- SPAMS | Average size of 0.8–1.5 μm | This study | 
| An urban park in the industrial city of Terni, Italy | SEM | PM1 (0.4 μg cm−2) | [23] | 
| PM2.5 (1.3 μg cm−2) | |||
| PM10 (5.2 μg cm−2) | |||
| Vacuum filtration | PM2.5 (1.3 μg cm−2) | ||
| PM10 (3.1 μg cm−2) | |||
| An urban green space on a campus in Hangzhou, China | Elution-filtration-weighing | PM2.5 (5–21 %), | [25] | 
| PM2.5–10, (11–40 %) | |||
| PM10–100 (49–83 %) | |||
| An artificial experiment in Beijing, China | Elution-filtration- weighing | PM0.2–3 (0.6–10.3 μg cm−2) | [26] | 
| PM3–10 (1.0–18.8 μg cm−2) | |||
| PM10–100 (4.5–60.1 μg cm−2) | |||
| A smog chamber experiment in Shanghai, China | Sweep-resuspension- particle size spectrometry | PM1 (14–18 %) | [27] | 
| PM1–2.5 (28–29 %) | |||
| PM2.5–5 (34–37 %) | |||
| Average size of 3.3–3.5 μm | |||
| X-ray microscope | Average size of 3.7–3.8 μm |