Skip to main content
. 2024 May 31;12:e17494. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17494

Table 2. The diagnostic performance of the validation cohort in Zhengzhou and Nanchang.

AUC (95% CI) P Se (%) (95% CI) Sp (%) (95% CI) PPV (%) NPV (%) Accuracy (%)
Zhengzhou 0.733 [0.642–0.082] <0.0001 28.1 [18.1–40.8] 93.0 [83.3–97.2] 80.0 56.4 60.5
Nanchang 0.745 [0.614–0.876] 0.0017 39.3 [23.6–57.6] 89.3 [72.8–96.3] 78.6 59.5 64.3

Note:

Cut off: 0.351 was determined by the 90% percentile of Nanchang NC. Se, sensitivity; Sp, specificity; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.