Table 2. The diagnostic performance of the validation cohort in Zhengzhou and Nanchang.
| AUC (95% CI) | P | Se (%) (95% CI) | Sp (%) (95% CI) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | Accuracy (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhengzhou | 0.733 [0.642–0.082] | <0.0001 | 28.1 [18.1–40.8] | 93.0 [83.3–97.2] | 80.0 | 56.4 | 60.5 |
| Nanchang | 0.745 [0.614–0.876] | 0.0017 | 39.3 [23.6–57.6] | 89.3 [72.8–96.3] | 78.6 | 59.5 | 64.3 |
Note:
Cut off: 0.351 was determined by the 90% percentile of Nanchang NC. Se, sensitivity; Sp, specificity; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.