Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 2;10(3):207–214. doi: 10.1159/000536246

Table 4.

Previous studies investigating contact delayed hypersensitivity in rosacea patients

Study Country Patch test series No. of rosacea patients No. of controls Percentage of rosacea patients with positive reaction to ≥1 allergen Percentage of controls with positive reaction to ≥1 allergen
Corazza et al. [8] (1997) Italy GIRDA standard series 29 _ 41% _
Jappe et al. [9] (2005) Germany, Austria, Switzerland ICDRG standard series extended by DKG 361 _ 38.2% _
Cakmak et al. [10] (2007) Turkey European Cosmetic Series 25 20 32% 0%
Jappe et al. [11] (2008) Germany ICDRG standard series extended by DKG 78 _ 62.8% _
Pónyai et al. [12] (2012) Hungary Brial GmbH D-Greven series 82 _ 35.4% _
Darlenski et al. [13] (2013) Bulgaria European Baseline Series 28 32 Equal Equal
Diczig et al. [14] (2018) Hungary Unknown 143 _ 37.8% _
Erdogan et al. [15] (2018) Turkey European Baseline Series 65 60 32.3% 20%
Cifci et al. [16] (2019) Turkey Nickel units from European Standard Series 40 40 52.5% 22.5%
Ozbagcivan et al. [17] (2020) Turkey European Cosmetic Series 103 104 60.2% 24%
Chen et al. [18] (2021) China Skin patch tests with C-1000 cosmetic series (Chemotechnique Diagnostics, Malmo, Sweden 267 100 57.3% 27%
Magdaleno-Tapial et al. [19] (2022) Spain Standard series of Spanish Contact Dermatitis and Skin Allergy Research Group 200 – 46.5% –