Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 9;229(5):1021–1045. doi: 10.1007/s00429-024-02790-8

Table 8.

Results of the contrast analyses on optic flow and both egocentric and allocentric navigation

Cluster Region Hemisphere x y z Z
Optic flow > egocentric navigation
1 MTG RH 48 − 68 2 3.291
2 MTG LH − 47 − 71 3 3.291
3 pCu RH 12 − 47 50 3.291
4 SOG RH 23 − 85 32 3.291
Optic flow > allocentric navigation
1 MTG RH 47 − 68 5 3.291
2 pCu RH 11 − 46 50 3.291
3 MTG LH − 44 − 67 8 3.291
4 dPOS LH − 19 − 83 42 3.291
SOG LH − 20 − 78 42 3.090
Egocentric navigation > optic flow
1 PHG/HC RH 22 − 41 − 2 3.291
CC/vermis RH 9 − 47 2 3.090
2 pCu/CC LH − 16 − 59 13 3.291
pCu/CC LH − 14 − 54 16 3.090
3 HC LH − 23 − 36 − 5 3.291
PHG LH − 20 − 39 − 4 3.090
Allocentric navigation > optic flow
1 pCu/CC LH − 15 − 60 14 3.291
2 LG RH 17 − 48 3 3.090
CC RH 16 − 54 5 3.090

For each cluster region, label, hemisphere, MNI coordinates, and z score are provided. Labels as in the captions of Table 2 and 3