Skip to main content
Molecular Medicine Reports logoLink to Molecular Medicine Reports
. 2024 May 24;30(1):130. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2024.13254

Association of gut dysbiosis with first‑episode psychosis (Review)

Christos Theleritis 1,, Maria-Ioanna Stefanou 2, Marina Demetriou 1, Evangelos Alevyzakis 1, Konstantinos Triantafyllou 3, Nikolaos Smyrnis 1, Demetrios A Spandidos 4, Emmanouil Rizos 1
PMCID: PMC11148526  PMID: 38785152

Abstract

The gut-microbiota-brain axis is a complex bidirectional communication system linking the gastrointestinal tract to the brain. Changes in the balance, composition and diversity of the gut-microbiota (gut dysbiosis) have been found to be associated with the development of psychosis. Early-life stress, along with various stressors encountered in different developmental phases, have been shown to be associated with the abnormal composition of the gut microbiota, leading to irregular immunological and neuroendocrine functions, which are potentially responsible for the occurrence of first-episode psychosis (FEP). The aim of the present narrative review was to summarize the significant differences of the altered microbiome composition in patients suffering from FEP vs. healthy controls, and to discuss its effects on the occurrence and intensity of symptoms in FEP.

Keywords: gut-microbiota-brain axis, first-episode psychosis, schizophrenia, early-life stress, gut microbiome, gut dysbiosis, gut microbiota

1. Introduction

Changes in the balance, composition and diversity of the gut microbiota (gut dysbiosis) have been found to be associated with the occurrence of various neuropsychiatric disorders and psychosis (13). Specifically, the gut-microbiota-brain axis, is a complex bidirectional connection system linking the gastrointestinal tract to the brain (Fig. 1), which passes through various connecting roots, such as the neuroendocrine system, the vagus nerve and the immune system (4). Additionally, the gut microbiota is responsible for the generation of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), neurotransmitters [dopamine, norepinephrine, norepinephrine-gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), glutamate and serotonin] and precursors of neurotransmitters. All these substances have been found to affect brain processes (57); for instance, SCFAs have been shown to prevent blood-brain barrier dysfunction and promote neurogenesis, angiogenesis and long-term memory storage (8).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The gut-microbiota-brain axis in schizophrenia. The gut-microbiota-brain axis refers to the bidirectional communication network between the central nervous system and the gastrointestinal tract. Implicated pathways include the activation of the vagus nerve, the secretion of pro-inflammatory mediators (e.g., cytokines) and microbial metabolites (e.g., short-chain fatty acids), along with enteroendocrine cell signaling. In schizophrenia, microbiome alterations and gut dysbiosis are considered to predispose to: i) Abnormal neurotransmission, including the dysregulation of GABA, serotonin and tryptophan-mediated pathways; and ii) a state of chronic neuroinflammation. These pathways combined confer an increased risk for overt activation of the dopaminergic system in the brain, which in turn may precipitate manifestation of psychosis. The image created using BioRender.com. GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid.

Early-life stress and various stressors encountered have been shown to be associated with gut dysbiosis, leading to irregular immunological and neuroendocrine functions, which potentially contribute to the occurrence of first-episode psychosis (FEP) (9). The treatment of psychosis could entail specific dietary interventions, along with the use of probiotics, prebiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation (10,11).

2. Gut microbiome and schizophrenia

The gut microbiota has been found to be associated with the occurrence of schizophrenia (SCH) (11,12). Numerous bacterial species have been found to have serotonin-synthesizing qualities (13), while abnormalities in the conversion route of tryptophan to serotonin have been reported to be linked to SCH (10). In the study by Zhu et al (14), the transfer of fecal microbiota from patients with SCH into antibiotic-treated mice resulted in psychomotor hyperactivity, diminished learning and memory, as well as in an increase in tryptophan catabolism through the kynurenine (Kyn)-kynurenic acid (Kyna) route in the peripheral and central nervous systems [Kyn and Kyna are known to influence central glutamate and serotonin systems (15)]. In the study by Zhu et al (14), the Kyn/Kyna levels were found to be associated with glutamate in the prefrontal cortex, dopamine in the striatum, and glutamate and tryptophan in the hippocampus; additionally, elevated basal levels of extracellular dopamine were found in the prefrontal cortex and 5-hydroxytryptamine in hippocampus in mice receiving SCH fecal microbiota (14).

Furthermore, it has been proposed that d-serine may be associated with SCH; consequently, changes in the gut microbiota could modulate the metabolism of d-amino acids (16,17). Moreover, Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium in the gut may be able to produce GABA, a neurotransmitter that has been shown to be associated with SCH (16). Within this context, alterations in the glutamate glutamine-GABA cycle and reduced levels of glutamate in the brain were proposed to be associated with NMDA receptor hypofunction in SCH (18). Furthermore, the utilization of NMDA receptor antagonists (phencyclidine and ketamine) may elicit psychotic positive and negative symptoms, along with cognitive dysfunction in healthy subjects, patients with SCH and rodents (19,20). The dysregulation of dopamine in the brain has also been found to be associated with SCH. Staphylococcus can convert l-DOPA into dopamine in the human gut (21). It is noteworthy that in the study by Li et al (22), the shortage of vitamin B6 decreased dopamine levels and produced social deficits and excitation/inhibition abnormality in EphB6-deficient mice.

The levels of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida albicans, markers of gastrointestinal inflammation, have been reported to be elevated in patients with SCH and FEP (23,24). The association between gastrointestinal inflammation with C-reactive protein (25) and increased gastrointestinal permeability (26) has also been reported in patients with SCH. Deficits in social behavior, a modified tryptophan-kynurenine metabolic pathway and glutamate glutamine-GABA cycles have been reported following the administration of Streptococcus vestibularis in mice, a bacterium whose levels are increased in SCH (27). As regards the differences in the gut microbiota found in subjects with SCH, the levels of the genera Succinivibrio, Megasphaera, Clostridium and Collinsella have been found to be elevated, while those of Succinivibrio have been found to be related to the severity of symptoms (2830). In another study by Nguyen et al (31), it was observed that a plethora of Ruminococcaceae was associated with a reduced gravity of negative symptoms. At the genus level, the levels of Anaerococcus were shown to be elevated in SCH, while those of Haemophilus, Sutterella, and Clostridium were shown to be reduced; at the phylum level, the levels of Proteobacteria were found to be reduced in patients with SCH vs. controls (31). Nocera and Nasrallah (32) observed that there were associations between alterations in the gut microbiota and overall symptom gravity in SCH and negative symptomatology.

3. Gut microbiome and FEP

Gut dysbiosis may play a role in the occurrence of FEP and may be considered an objective for treatment (33). Below, 12 studies (presented in Table I) are discussed, which examined the effects of gut dysbiosis in treatment resistance and the psychotic symptomatology of subjects with FEP.

Table I.

Studies evaluating gut microbiome alterations in FEP.

Authors, year of publication Sample Type of study Results (Refs.)
Schwarz et al, Patients with FEP=28 Analysis of the Elevated Lactobacillus group bacteria in subjects (34)
2018 Healthy controls=16 differences in gut with FEP that were significantly associated with
microbiota severity along different symptom domains.
Subjects with FEP with the highest microbiome
alterations exhibited a poorer response after up to
12 months of treatment.
He et al, 2018 81 Patients at a high Analysis of the Increased levels of Clostridiales, Lactobacillales (35)
   risk of developing differences in gut and Bacteroidales were noted in the fecal
psychosis (HR) microbiota and samples of UHR subjects compared to the other
subjects, 19 patients at choline two groups. Increased production of short-chain
an ultra-high risk of concentrations in the fatty acids (SCFAs), as indicated by changes in
developing psychosis anterior cingulate microbiota composition, which can lead to the
(UHR) and 69 health cortex (ACC) activation of microglia and disruption of
controls (HC) membrane metabolism.
Yuan et al, Patients with FEP=41 Analysis of the Subjects with FEP had significantly reduced (36)
2018 Healthy controls=41 differences in gut numbers of fecal Bifidobacterium spp.,
microbiota (patients Escherichia coli and Lactobacillus spp. and
with FEP received significantly higher numbers of fecal
risperidone for 24 Clostridium coccoides. After 24 weeks of
weeks) treatment with risperidone, significant increases
in body weight, BMI, fasting blood glucose,
triglycerides, LDL and a major elevation in the
numbers of fecal Bifidobacterium spp. and
Escherichia coli were observed. Furthermore,
significant decreases in the numbers of fecal
Clostridium coccoides and Lactobacillus spp
were observed.
Zhang et al, Patients with FEP=10 Cross-sectional study. The microbiota of patients with FEP had (37)
2020 Healthy controls=16 Analysis of the increased numbers of Proteobacteria and
differences in gut decreased short-chain fatty acid (SCFA)-
microbiota (FEP drug producing bacteria (Faecalibacterium and
naïve) Lachnospiraceae genera). The gut mycobiota
exhibited a relative reduction in alpha diversity
and an altered composition. Patients with FEP
displayed a significant enhancement in the
bacteria-fungi correlation network.
Ma et al, 2020 FEP drug naïve Analysis of the Both patients with FEP and chronic schizophrenia (38)
   patients=40 differences in gut had marked changes in Christensenellaceae,
Chronically microbiota and T1- Enterobacteriaceae, Pasteurellaceae,
antipsychotic-treated weighted MRI brain Turicibacteraceae at the family level and
patients=85 Healthy imaging data Escherichia at the genus level. Major
controls=69 disturbances in the gut microbiome composition
in patients with chronic schizophrenia and FEP
(e.g., Enterococcaceae and Lactobacillaceae).
Certain schizophrenia-related microbiota were
associated with the right middle frontal gyrus
volume, which was abnormal in schizophrenic
subjects.
Zhu et al, Patients with Analysis of the Patients with FEP had a higher alpha diversity (27)
2020 FEP=90+45 Healthy differences in gut and higher beta diversity. Differences in short-
controls=81+45 microbiota in the first chain fatty acid synthesis, tryptophan
episode of metabolism and synthesis/degradation of
schizophrenia vs. 3 neurotransmitters associated with FEP. FMT of
months later with a schizophrenia-enriched bacterium,
antipsychotics vs. Streptococcus vestibularis, induced deficits in
controls) and animals social behaviors and altered neurotransmitter
(mice) levels in peripheral tissues of recipient mice.
Zhu et al, Patients with FEP with Analysis of the Abundance of Haemophilus was positively (39)
2021 acute schizophrenia, differences in gut associated with negative psychiatric symptoms,
n=42 Patients with microbiota cognition, excitement and depression while
schizophrenia in abundance of Coprococcus was negatively
remission n=40 associated with negative psychiatric symptoms.
Healthy controls n=44
Yuan et al, FEP drug naïve Analysis of the Following 24 weeks of risperidone treatment, (40)
2021 patients=107 Healthy differences in gut there was an increase in alpha diversity. At the
controls=107 microbiota (patients genus level, a decreased abundance of
with FEP received Lachnoclostridium and an increased abundance
risperidone for 24 of Romboutsia were observed. Moreover, the
weeks) treatment response in patients with FEP was
significantly associated with the basal levels of
Lachnoclostridium and Romboutsia.
Li et al, 2021 Patients with FEP=56 Analysis of the Following 24 weeks of risperidone treatment, (41)
Healthy controls=35 differences in gut there were positive associations between the
microbiota (patients baseline serum levels of butyric acid and the
with FEP received reduction ratio of the PANSS total, and subscale
risperidone for 24 scores. In addition, there was a positive
weeks) association between the increase in serum levels
of butyric acid and the reduction of the PANSS-
positive symptoms subscale scores.
Yuan et al, Patients with FEP=205 Analysis of gut Patients with FEP exhibited a lower fungal alpha (42)
2022 Healthy controls=125 bacterial and fungal diversity and a significantly lower fungi-to-
compositions bacteria alpha diversity ratio. The fungal-
bacterial correlation network was denser in the
HCs than in patients with FEP and was
characterized by a high number of neighbors
(P<0.05). An increased abundance of
Purpureocillium was associated with more
severe psychiatric symptoms and poorer
cognitive function in patients with FEP.
Wang et al, Patients with FEP=127 Analysis of The altered metabolome and dysregulated (43)
2024 Healthy controls=92 multiomics data, microbiome were associated gamma-
including the serum aminobutyric acid (GABA), tryptophan, and
metabolome, fecal short-chain fatty acids. Further structural and
metagenome, single functional MRI analyses highlighted that gray
nucleotide matter volume and functional connectivity
polymorphism data, disturbances mediate the relationships between
and neuroimaging Ruminococcus torgues and Collinsella
data. Pathway-based aerofaciens and symptom severity, and the
polygenic risk score associations between Lactobacillus ruminis and
(PRS) analyses were the differential metabolites, l-2,4-
used diaminobutyric acid and N-acetylserotonin, and
cognitive function.
Sen et al, 2024 Patients with FEP=26 Analysis of the Abundance of Bifidobacterium adolescentis, (33)
   Healthy controls=22 differences in gut Prevotella copri and Turicibacter sanguinis was
microbiota markedly increased in the FEP group.
Assessment of the oral Deoxyribonucleotide biosynthesis, branched-
microbiome in 13 chain amino acid biosynthesis, tricarboxylic acid
patients with FEP cycle, and fatty acid elongation and
biosynthesis, were dysregulated in the FEP
group. Bacteroides dorei, Bifidobacterium
adolescentis, Turicibacter sanguinis, Roseburia
spp. and Ruminococcus lactaris were positively
associated with weight gain.

FEP, first-episode psychosis; BMI, body mass index; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; PANSS, positive and negative syndrome scale.

In the study by Schwarz et al (34), dissimilarities in the composition of the gut microbiota were reported between patients with FEP vs. the controls; Lactobacillus numbers were found to be increased and were positively associated with severity of SCH symptoms and increased positive SCH symptoms, while negative symptoms were associated with Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae. Additionally, Lactobacillus, Lachnospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae and Bacteroides spp. were shown to be negatively associated with functioning, as assessed using the Global Assessment of Functioning scale. In patients with FEP, at the family level, elevated proportions of Lactobacillaceae, Halothiobacillaceae, Brucellaceae and Micrococcineae were found, while the levels of Veillonellaceae were reduced compared with the controls; a proportion of patients with FEP with increased differences in the gut microbiota exhibited a poorer treatment efficacy following 1 year of treatment (34). In the study by He et al (35), in participants at an ultra-high risk of developing psychosis, elevated levels of Clostridiales, Lactobacillales and Bacteroidales were found, together with an increase in the levels of choline (a brain image marker of membrane dysfunction) vs. the two other study groups of high risk for psychosis and controls. Yuan et al (36) examined the changes in metabolism and gut microbiota composition following treatment with risperidone for 6 months in drug naïve subjects with FEP; the subjects exhibited abnormalities in gut microbiota composition, and had significantly reduced amounts of fecal Bifidobacterium spp., Escherichia coli, Lactobacillus spp. and elevated amounts of fecal Clostridium coccoides vs. the controls. Following 6 months of treatment, there was a significant deterioration in metabolic parameters along with significant increases in the amounts of Bifidobacterium spp. and Escherichia coli, and significant reductions in the amounts of Clostridium coccoides and Lactobacillus spp.; changes in Bifidobacterium spp. were associated with changes in weight and body mass index following 6 months of antipsychotic treatment (36). In their study, Zhang et al (37), found a significant intensification in the bacteria-fungi association network in subjects with FEP and proposed that both bacterial gut microbiota and gut microbiota promoted gut dysbiosis in subjects with SCH. In subjects with FEP, they demonstrated a plethora of harmful bacteria (Proteobacteria) and reduced levels of Faecalibacterium and Lachnospiraceae, while the gut microbiota exhibited a relative decrease in alpha diversity and an altered composition; furthermore, the subjects with FEP exhibitedan elevated amount of Chaetomium and a reduced amount of Trichoderma vs. the control group (37). In the study by Ma et al (38), it was demonstrated that subjects with psychosis, exhibited an elevation in the levels of Christensenellaceae, Enterobacteriaceae and Victivallaceae, and a reduction in the levels of Pasteurellaceae, Turicibacteraceae, Peptostreptococcaceae, Veillonellaceae and Succinivibrionaceae vs. the controls. In addition, subjects with SCH undergoing antipsychotic treatment exhibited a plethora of Peptostreptococcaceae and Veillonellaceae and the genera Megasphaera, Fusobacterium and SMB53 vs. drug-naïve subjects with FEP. A number of specific SCH-related microbiota were found to be associated with abnormal right middle frontal gyrus volume, found in subjects with SCH. In the study by Zhu et al (27), subjects with FEP demonstrated alterations in short-chain fatty acid synthesis, tryptophan metabolism and synthesis/degradation of neurotransmitters and exhibited increased alpha and beta diversity. It is worth noting that Streptococcus vestibularis, instigated deficiencies in social behavior and modified the amount of neurotransmitters in recipient mice. The authors of that study (27) emphasized the fact that microbial metabolites may be affecting the occurrence of SCH. In another study, Zhu et al (39) discovered that the beta diversity of the gut microbiota composition in subjects with FEP differed from that found in subjects with SCH and the controls. A plethora of Haemophilus was positively associated with negative SCH symptomatology, excitement, cognition and depression and an abundance of Coprococcus was negatively associated with negative SCH symptomatology (39). In the study by Yuan et al (40), following 6 months of treatment of subjects with FEP with risperidone, there was a plethora of Romboutsia and a reduced amount of Lachnoclostridium, while an increase in alpha diversity was observed. It is noteworthy that the effectiveness of treatment in patients with SCH was significantly correlated with the basal levels of Lachnoclostridium and Romboutsia (40). In the study by Li et al (41), following 6 months of treatment with risperidone, a significant increase in the serum levels of butyric acid was observed in drug-naïve subjects with FEP. The authors of that study proposed that elevated serum levels of butyric acid may be associated with the treatment efficacy in subjects with FEP, as observed with reductions in the positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) total and subscale scores (41). In the study by Yuan et al (42), drug-naïve subjects with FEP exhibited lower fungal alpha diversity and a significantly lower fungi-to-bacteria alpha diversity ratio vs. the controls. In addition, an elevated amount of Purpureocillium was shown to be associated with more severe SCH symptomatology and poorer cognitive ability in subjects with SCH, while an elevated amount of Aspergillus was found to be associated with an improved cognitive ability. Wang et al (43) found that an altered metabolome and dysregulated microbiome were associated with neuroactive metabolites, including GABA, tryptophan and short-chain fatty acids. They underlined the association between Ruminococcus torgues and Collinsella aerofaciens and symptom intensity, and the associations between Lactobacillus ruminis and the differential metabolites, l-2,4-diaminobutyric acid and N-acetylserotonin, and cognitive ability (43). Alterations in GABA and tryptophan neurotransmitter pathways were found to be associated with the risk of developing SCH (43). Finally, Sen et al (33), in subjects with FEP, found an increase in the amounts of Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Prevotella copri and Turicibacter sanguinis along with abnormalities in deoxyribonucleotide biosynthesis, branched-chain amino acid biosynthesis, the tricarboxylic acid cycle and fatty acid elongation and biosynthesis. Furthermore, certain gut microbes, such as Bacteroides dorei, Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Turicibacter sanguinis, Roseburia spp. and Ruminococcus lactaris were shown to be positively associated with weight gain (33).

4. Models explaining the link between the gut microbiome and FEP

It is worth noting that an increased intestinal permeability, chronic inflammation and oxidative stress, observed in subjects with SCH, have been proposed to be associated with changes in the microbiome (1,25). Moreover, the gut microbiota mediates the regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines; in fact, increased amounts of IL-6, TNF-a, soluble IL-2 receptor, and elevated prostaglandin E2 levels and COX activity have been observed in subjects with FEP (44,45). Previous research using rats demonstrated that exposure to diverse early-life stressors (e.g., maternal separation or social isolation) could alter the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and intensify the plasma corticosterone response following acute stress, resulting in the elevated production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (46,47). Subsequently, Ko and Liu (48) observed an increase in the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1b, IL-6 and TNF-a) following 4 weeks of the rearing of rats in isolation. In the study by Dunphy-Doherty et al (49), it was found that continuous social isolation in rats (a confirmed animal model for SCH) resulted in changes to the gut microbiota (increases in Actinobacteria and decreases in the class Clostridia), decreased levels of hippocampal IL-6 and IL-10, and modified neurogenesis (significantly fewer BrdU/NeuN-positive cells in the dentate gyrus compared with the controls).

It has been proposed that following adversities in life (9,50), gene-environment interactions (50) and epigen-etic mechanisms (51,52) may influence the expression of genes involved in neurodevelopment, the stress response and synaptic function, which could potentially promote the occurrence of psychosis through their effects on neurotransmitters and the immune system, resulting in oxidative stress (53). Consequently, it has been suggested that genetic vulnerability and pre-/perinatal risk factors (e.g., hypoxia, maternal stress, viral infec-tion and malnutrition) may render the subject more vulnerable to environmental stressors (e.g. childhood trauma, urbanicity, migration and substance abuse) (54). Similarly, it has been suggested that early-life adversity may modify the function of the HPA axis, leading to an altered stress response (55) and heightened stress sensitivity to future stressors in adolescence and adulthood (5658), thus promoting the occurrence of SCH symptoms through dopaminergic hyperactivity (59). Furthermore, protracted exposure to stress and to glucocorticoids may result in a decrease in hippocampal volume (60) and reduced levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor, as observed in subjects with SCH (6166).

5. Treatment of gut dysbiosis in patients with FEP

The treatment of gut dysbiosis in patients with FEP could entail specific dietary interventions, along with the use of probiotics, prebiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation. The administration of vitamin D and probiotics, including Bifidobacterium bifidum, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus fermentum and Lactobacillus reuteri has been shown to result in improvements in the general and total PANSS score, and in metabolic parameters, as well as in a decrease in C-reactive protein levels in patients with SCH (67). In another study, patients with SCH that were administered a probiotic with Bifidobacterium breve A-1, exhibited elevated levels of IFN-γ, IL-22, IL-1R and IL-10, and decreased TNF-α levels; these results were associated with ameliorated hospital anxiety and depression scale scores and positive and negative syndrome scale scores (68). In the study by Bravo et al (69), non-vagotomized mice fed Lactobacillus rhamnosus demonstrated decreased anxiety levels, with a modified central GABA receptor expression. In the study by Kao et al (70), the prebiotic, Bimuno galactooligosaccharide™ (B-GOS®), was administered to rats in combination with olanzapine; it decreased the acetate concentrations, blocked weight gain and improved cognitive function in psychosis. Fecal microbiota transplantation is still at the experimental stage and there are only a limited number of reports evaluating its efficacy in psychosis (71,72). Optogenetic manipulations of the gut brain axis in patients with SCH have been also proposed and are under examination (73).

6. Conclusions and future perspectives

The present review discussed the instrumental role of the gut microbiota in the brain and its influence on the occurrence of FEP. There is great heterogeneity observed in the changes in gut microbiota composition; however, the studies presented herein demonstrate significant GM alterations in patients with FEP vs. the controls, and underline the significant role of gut dysbiosis in the occurrence, symptom intensity and treatment efficacy in FEP. It should be noted that the composition of the gut microbiota in subjects with FEP may be influenced by various dietary, environmental and treatment factors; consequently, investigating the gut microbiota in various populations may provide the opportunity for the establishment of causal associations and the possibility for personalized treatment strategies (7476). Within this context, further human studies are warranted, with a sufficient number of subjects who are at risk of developing psychosis, in order to further enable the evaluation of GM alterations related to FEP.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding Statement

Funding: No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors' contributions

CT and ER made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study, and the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data to be included in the review. CT and ER were also involved in the drafting of the manuscript, and in revising it critically for important intellectual content. MIS, MD, EA, KT, NS and DAS contributed to the design of the study. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript. Data authentication is not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

DAS is the Editor-in-Chief for the journal, but had no personal involvement in the reviewing process, or any influence in terms of adjudicating on the final decision, for this article. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Nguyen TT, Kosciolek T, Eyler LT, Knight R, Jeste DV. Overview and systematic review of studies of microbiome in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. J Psychiatr Res. 2018;99:50–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.01.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Van Ameringen M, Turna J, Patterson B, Pipe A, Mao RQ, Anglin R, Surette MG. The gut microbiome in psychiatry: A primer for clinicians. Depress Anxiety. 2019;36:1004–1025. doi: 10.1002/da.22936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Liu JCW, Gorbovskaya I, Hahn MK, Müller DJ. The gut microbiome in schizophrenia and the potential benefits of prebiotic and probiotic treatment. Nutrients. 2021;13:1152. doi: 10.3390/nu13041152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gómez-Eguílaz M, Ramón-Trapero JL, Pérez-Martínez L, Blanco JR. The microbiota-gut-brain axis and its large projections. Rev Neurol. 2019;68:111–117. (In Spanish) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Strandwitz P. Neurotransmitter modulation by the gut microbiota. Brain Res. 2018;1693:128–133. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.03.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chen Y, Xu J, Chen Y. Regulation of Neurotransmitters by the gut microbiota and effects on cognition in neurological disorders. Nutrients. 2021;13:2099. doi: 10.3390/nu13062099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stopińska K, Radziwoń-Zaleska M, Domitrz I. The microbiota gut-brain axis as a key to neuropsychiatric disorders: A mini review. J Clin Med. 2021;10:4640. doi: 10.3390/jcm10204640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Michel L, Prat A. One more role for the gut: Microbiota and blood brain barrier. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4:15. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.10.16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Giannopoulou I, Georgiades S, Stefanou MI, Spandidos DA, Rizos E. Links between trauma and psychosis (Review) Exp Ther Med. 2023;26:386. doi: 10.3892/etm.2023.12085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kang DW, Adams JB, Coleman DM, Pollard EL, Maldonado J, McDonough-Means S, Caporaso JG, Krajmalnik-Brown R. Long-term benefit of microbiota transfer therapy on autism symptoms and gut microbiota. SciRep. 2019;9:5821. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42183-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rantala MJ, Luoto S, Borraz-Leon JI, Krams I. Schizophrenia: The new etiological synthesis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022;142:104894. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Munawar N, Ahmad A, Anwar MA, Muhammad K. Modulation of gut microbial diversity through non-pharmaceutical approaches to treat schizophrenia. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:2625. doi: 10.3390/ijms23052625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Roth W, Zadeh K, Vekariya R, Ge Y, Mohamadzadeh M. Tryptophan metabolism and gut brain homeostasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:2923. doi: 10.3390/ijms22062973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhu F, Guo R, Wang W, Ju Y, Wang Q, Ma Q, Sun Q, Fan Y, Xie Y, Yang Z, et al. Transplantation of microbiota from drug-free patients with schizophrenia causes schizophrenia-like abnormal behaviors and dysregulated kynurenine metabolism in mice. Mol Psychiatry. 2020;25:2905–2918. doi: 10.1038/s41380-019-0475-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Agus A, Planchais J, Sokol H. Gut microbiota regulation of tryptophan metabolism in health and disease. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;23:716–724. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ghorbani M, Rajandas H, Parimannan S, Stephen Joseph GB, Tew MM, Ramly SS, Muhamad Rasat MA, Lee SY. Understanding the role of gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. Psychiatr Genet. 2021;31:39–49. doi: 10.1097/YPG.0000000000000270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mikulska J, Juszczyk G, Gawrońska-Grzywacz M, Herbet M. Brain sciences HPA Axis in the pathomechanism of depression and schizophrenia: New therapeutic strategies based on its participation. Brain Sci. 2021;11:1298. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11101298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zheng P, Zeng B, Liu M, Chen J, Pan J, Han Y, Liu Y, Cheng K, Zhou C, Wang H, et al. The gut microbiome from patients with schizophrenia modulates the glutamate-glutamine-GABA cycle and schizophrenia-relevant behaviors in mice. Sci Adv. 2019;5:eaau8317. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau8317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Krystal JH, Karper LP, Seibyl JP, Freeman GK, Delaney R, Bremner JD, Heninger GR, Bowers MB, Jr, Charney DS. Subanesthetic effects of the non-competitive NMDA antagonist, ketamine, in humans: Psychotomimetic, perceptual, cognitive, and neuroendocrine responses. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994;51:199–214. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950030035004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jodo E. The role of the hippocampo-prefrontal cortex system in phencyclidine-induced psychosis: A model for schizophrenia. J Physiol Paris. 2013;107:434–440. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2013.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Luqman A, Nega M, Nguyen MT, Ebner P, Götz F. SadA: Expressing staphylococci in the human gut show increased cell adherence and internalization. Cell Rep. 2018;22:535–545. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li Y, Luo ZY, Hu YY, Bi YW, Yang JM, Zou WJ, Song YL, Li S, Shen T, Li SJ, et al. The gut microbiota regulates autism-like behavior by mediating vitamin B6 homeostasis in EphB6-deficient mice. Microbiome. 2020;8:120. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00884-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Severance EG, Alaedini A, Yang S, Halling M, Gressitt KL, Stallings CR, Origoni AE, Vaughan C, Khushalani S, Leweke FM, et al. Gastrointestinal inflammation and associated immune activation in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2012;138:48–53. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.02.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Severance EG, Gressitt KL, Yang S, Stallings CR, Origoni AE, Vaughan C, Khushalani S, Alaedini A, Dickerson FB, Yolken RH. Seroreactive marker for inflammatory bowel disease and associations with antibodies to dietary proteins in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2014;16:230–240. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Severance EG, Gressitt KL, Stallings CR, Origoni AE, Khushalani S, Leweke FM, Dickerson FB, Yolken RH. Discordant patterns of bacterial translocation markers and implications for innate immune imbalances in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2013;148:130–137. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.05.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Severance EG, Yolken RH, Eaton WW. Autoimmune diseases, gastrointestinal disorders and the microbiome in schizophrenia: More than a gut feeling. Schizophr Res. 2016;176:23–35. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.06.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhu F, Ju Y, Wang W, Wang Q, Guo R, Ma Q, Sun Q, Fan Y, Xie Y, Yang Z, et al. Metagenome-Wide association of gut microbiome features for schizophrenia. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1612. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15457-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shen Y, Xu J, Li Z, Huang Y, Yuan Y, Wang J, Zhang M, Hu S, Liang Y. Analysis of gut microbiota diversity and auxiliary diagnosis as a biomarker in patients with schizophrenia: A cross-sectional study. Schizophr Res. 2018;197:470–477. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Li S, Zhuo M, Huang X, Huang Y, Zho J, Xiong D, Li J, Liu Y, Pan Z, Li H, et al. Altered gut microbiota associated with symptom severity in schizophrenia. PeerJ. 2020;8:e9574. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Xu R, Wu B, Liang J, He F, Gu W, Li K, Luo Y, Chen J, Gao Y, Wu Z, et al. altered gut microbiota and mucosal immunity in patients with schizophrenia. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;85:120–127. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2019.06.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nguyen TT, Kosciolek T, Maldonado Y, Daly RE, Martin AS, McDonald D, Knight R, Jeste DV. Differences in gut microbiome composition between persons with chronic schizophrenia and healthy comparison subjects. Schizophr Res. 2019;204:23–29. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nocera A, Nasrallah HA. The association of the gut microbiota with clinical features in schizophrenia. Behav Sci (Basel) 2022;12:89. doi: 10.3390/bs12040089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sen P, Prandovszky E, Honkanen JK, Chen O, Yolken R, Suvisaari J. Dysregulation of microbiota in patients with first-episode psychosis is associated with symptom severity and treatment response. Biol Psychiatry. 2024;95:370–379. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.10.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schwarz E, Maukonen J, Hyytiäinen T, Kieseppä T, Orešič M, Sabunciyan S, Mantere O, Saarela M, Yolken R, Suvisaari J. Analysis of microbiota in first episode psychosis identifies preliminary associations with symptom severity and treatment response. Schizophr Res. 2018;192:398–403. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.He Y, Kosciolek T, Tang J, Zhou Y, Li Z, Ma X, Zhu Q, Yuan N, Yuan L, Li C, et al. Gut microbiome and magnetic resonance spectroscopy study of subjects at ultra-high risk for psychosis may support the membrane hypothesis. Eur Psychiatry. 2018;53:37–45. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yuan X, Zhang P, Wang Y, Liu Y, Li X, Kumar BU, Hei G, Lv L, Huang XF, Fan X, Song X. Changes in metabolism and microbiota after 24-week risperidone treatment in drug naïve, normal weight patients with first episode schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2018;201:299–306. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.05.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhang X, Pan LY, Zhang Z, Zhou YY, Jiang HY, Ruan B. Analysis of gut mycobiota in first-episode, drug-naïve Chinese patients with schizophrenia: A pilot study. Behav Brain Res. 2020;379:112374. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ma X, Asif H, Dai L, He Y, Zheng W, Wang D, Ren H, Tang J, Li C, Jin K, et al. Alteration of the gut microbiome in first-episode drug-naïve and chronic medicated schizophrenia correlate with regional brain volumes. J Psychiatr Res. 2020;123:136–144. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhu C, Zheng M, Ali U, Xia Q, Wang Z, Chenlong, Yao L, Chen Y, Yan J, Wang K, et al. Association between abundance of haemophilus in the gut microbiota and negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:685910. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.685910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yuan X, Wang Y, Li X, Jiang J, Kang Y, Pang L, Zhang P, Li A, Lv L, Andreassen OA, et al. Gut microbial biomarkers for the treatment response in first-episode, drug-naïve schizophrenia: A 24-week follow-up study. Transl Psychiatry. 2021;11:422. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01531-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Li X, Fan X, Yuan X, Pang L, Hu S, Wang Y, Huang X, Song X. The role of butyric acid in treatment response in drug-naïve first episode schizophrenia. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:724664. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.724664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yuan X, Li X, Kang Y, Pang L, Hei G, Zhang X, Wang S, Zhao X, Zhang S, Tao Q, et al. Gut mycobiota dysbiosis in drug-naïve, first-episode schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2022;250:76–86. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2022.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wang Z, Yuan X, Zhu Z, Pang L, Ding S, Li X, Kang Y, Hei G, Zhang L, Zhang X, et al. Multiomics analyses reveal microbiome-gut-brain crosstalk centered on aberrant gamma-aminobutyric acid and tryptophan metabolism in drug-naïve patients with first-episode schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2024;50:187–198. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbad026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.García-Bueno B, Bioque M, Mac-Dowell KS, Barcones MF, Martínez-Cengotitabengoa M, Pina-Camacho L, Rodríguez-Jiménez R, Sáiz PA, Castro C, Lafuente A, et al. Pro-/anti-inflammatory dysregulation in patients with first episode of psychosis: Toward an integrative inflammatory hypothesis of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2014;40:376–387. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbt001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.García-Bueno B, Bioque M, MacDowell KS, Santabárbara J, Martínez-Cengotitabengoa M, Moreno C, Sáiz PA, Berrocoso E, Gassó P, Fe Barcones M, et al. Pro-/antiinflammatory dysregulation in early psychosis: Results from a 1-year follow-upstudy. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014;18:pyu037. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyu037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.O'Mahony SM, Marchesi JR, Scully P, Codling C, Ceolho AM, Quigley EM, Cryan JF, Dinan TG. Early life stress alters behavior, immunity, and microbiota in rats: implications for irritable bowel syndrome and psychiatric illnesses. Biol Psychiatry. 2009;65:263–267. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.06.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Plotsky PM, Thrivikraman KV, Nemeroff CB, Caldji C, Sharma S, Meaney MJ. Long-term consequences of neonatal rearing on central corticotropin releasing factor systems in adult male rat offspring. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2005;30:2192–2204. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ko CY, Liu YP. Isolation rearing impaired sensorimotor gating but increased pro-inflammatory cytokines and disrupted metabolic parameters in both sexes of rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2015;55:173–183. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Dunphy-Doherty F, O'Mahony SM, Peterson VL, O'Sullivan O, Crispie F, Cotter PD, Wigmore P, King MV, Cryan JF, Fone KCF. Post-weaning social isolation of rats leads to long-term disruption of the gut microbiota-immune-brain axis. Brain Behav Immun. 2018;68:261–273. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2017.10.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Morgan C, Charalambides M, Hutchinson G, Murray RM. Migration, ethnicity, and psychosis: Toward a sociodevelop-mental model. Schizophr Bull. 2010;36:655–664. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbq051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Davis EG, Humphreys KL, McEwen LM, Sacchet MD, Camacho MC, MacIsaac JL, Lin DTS, Kobor MS, Gotlib IH. Accelerated DNA methylation age in adolescent girls: Associations with elevated diurnal cortisol and reduced hippocampal volume. Transl Psychiatry. 2017;7:e1223. doi: 10.1038/tp.2017.188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chen Q, Li D, Jin W, Shi Y, Li Z, Ma P, Sun J, Chen S, Li P, Lin P. Research progress on the correlation between epigenetics and schizophrenia. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:688727. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.688727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Alameda L, Rodriguez V, Carr E, Aas M, Trotta G, Marino P, Vorontsova N, Herane-Vives A, Gadelrab R, Spinazzola E, et al. A systematic review on mediators between adversity and psychosis: Potential targets for treatment. Psychol Med. 2020;50:1966–1976. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720002421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bayer TA, Falkai P, Maier W. Genetic and non-genetic vulnerability factors in schizophrenia: The basis of the ‘two hit hypothesis.’. J Psychiatr Res. 1999;33:543–548. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3956(99)00039-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Charmandari E, Kino T, Souvatzoglou E, Chrousos GP. Pediatric stress: Hormonal mediators and human development. Horm Res. 2003;59:161–179. doi: 10.1159/000069325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lardinois M, Lataster T, Mengelers R, Van Os J, Myin-Germeys I. Childhood trauma and increased stress sensitivity in psychosis. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2011;23:28–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2010.01594.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Walker EF, Brennan PA, Esterberg M, Brasfield J, Pearce B, Compton MT. Longitudinal changes in cortisol secretion and conversion to psychosis in at-risk youth. J Abnorm Psychol. 2010;119:401–408. doi: 10.1037/a0018399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Walker EF, Trotman HD, Pearce BD, Addington J, Cadenhead KS, Cornblatt BA, Heinssen R, Mathalon DH, Perkins DO, Seidman LJ, et al. Cortisol levels and risk for psychosis: Initial findings from the North American prodrome longitudinal study. Biol Psychiatry. 2013;74:410–417. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.02.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Sapolsky RM. Glucocorticoids and hippocampal atrophy in neuropsychiatric disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57:925–935. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.57.10.925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Vita A, De Peri L, Silenzi C, Dieci M. Brain morphology in first-episode schizophrenia: A meta-analysis of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging studies. Schizophr Res. 2006;82:75–88. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2005.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Thompson Ray M, Weickert CS, Wyatt E, Webster MJ. Decreased BDNF, trkB-TK+ and GAD67 mRNA expression in the hippo-campus of individuals with schizophrenia and mood disorders. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2011;36:195–203. doi: 10.1503/jpn.100048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Daskalakis NP, De Kloet ER, Yehuda R, Malaspina D, Kranz TM. Early life stress effects on Glucocorticoid-BDNF interplay in the hippocampus. Front Mol Neurosci. 2015;8:68. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2015.00068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Rizos EN, Rontos I, Laskos E, Arsenis G, Michalopoulou PG, Vasilopoulos D, Gournellis R, Lykouras L. Investigation of serum BDNF levels in drug-naive patients with schizophrenia. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2008;32:1308–1311. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2008.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Rizos EN, Papathanasiou M, Michalopoulou PG, Mazioti A, Douzenis A, Kastania A, Nikolaidou P, Laskos E, Vasilopoulou K, Lykouras L. Association of serum BDNF levels with hippocampal volumes in first psychotic episode drug-naive schizophrenic patients. Schizophr Res. 2011;129:201–204. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Rizos EN, Michalopoulou PG, Siafakas N, Stefanis N, Douzenis A, Rontos I, Laskos E, Kastania A, Zoumpourlis V, Lykouras L. Association of serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor and duration of untreated psychosis in first-episode patients with schizophrenia. Neuropsychobiology. 2010;62:87–90. doi: 10.1159/000315438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Theleritis C, Fisher HL, Shäfer I, Winters L, Stahl D, Morgan C, Dazzan P, Breedvelt J, Sambath I, Vitoratou S, et al. Brain derived Neurotropic Factor (BDNF) is associated with childhood abuse but not cognitive domains in first episode psychosis. Schizophr Res. 2014;159:56–61. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ghaderi A, Banafshe HR, Mirhosseini N, Moradi M, Karimi MA, Mehrzad F, Bahmani F, Asemi Z. Clinical and metabolic response to vitamin D plus Probiotic in schizophrenia patients. BMC Psychiatry. 2019;19:77. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2059-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Okubo R, Koga M, Katsumata N, Odamaki T, Matsuyama S, Oka M, Narita H, Hashimoto N, Kusumi I, Xiao J, Matsuoka YJ. Effect of bifidobacterium breve A-1 on anxiety and depressive symptoms in schizophrenia: A proof-of-concept study. J Affect Disord. 2019;245:377–385. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Bravo JA, Forsythe P, Chew MV, Escaravage E, Savignac HM, Dinan TG, Bienenstock J, Cryan JF. Ingestion of Lactobacillus strain regulates emotional behavior and central GABA receptor expression in a mouse via the vagus nerve. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:16050–16055. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1102999108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kao ACC, Spitzer S, Anthony DC, Lennox B, Burnet PWJ. Prebiotic attenuation of olanzapine-induced weight gain in rats: Analysis of central and peripheral biomarkers and gut microbiota. Transl Psychiatry. 2018;8:66. doi: 10.1038/s41398-018-0116-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Hinton R. A case report looking at the effects of faecal microbiota transplantation in a patient with bipolar disorder. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2020;54:649–650. doi: 10.1177/0004867420912834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Parker G, Spoelma MJ, Rhodes N. Faecal microbiota transplantation for bipolar disorder: A detailed case study. Bipolar Disord. 2022;24:559–563. doi: 10.1111/bdi.13187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Patrono E, Svoboda J, Stuchlík A. Schizophrenia, the gut microbiota, and new opportunities from optogenetic manipulations of the gut-brain axis. Behav Brain Funct. 2021;17:7. doi: 10.1186/s12993-021-00180-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Nuncio-Mora L, Lanzagorta N, Nicolini H, Sarmiento E, Ortiz G, Sosa F, Genis-Mendoza AD. The role of the microbiome in first episode of psychosis. Biomedicines. 2023;11:1770. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11061770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Aschner M, Skalny AV, Gritsenko VA, Kartashova OL, Santamaria A, Rocha JBT, Spandidos DA, Zaitseva IP, Tsatsakis A, Tinkov AA. Role of gut microbiota in the modulation of the health effects of advanced glycation end-products (Review) Int J Mol Med. 2023;51:44. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2023.5247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Tsamakis K, Galinaki S, Alevyzakis E, Hortis I, Tsiptsios D, Kollintza E, Kympouropoulos S, Triantafyllou K, Smyrnis N, Rizos E. Gut Microbiome: A brief review on its role in schizophrenia and first episode of psychosis. Microorganisms. 2022;10:1121. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10061121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Molecular Medicine Reports are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES