Abstract
Rationale:
These Guidelines have been developed by the American Association of Feline Practitioners (AAFP) and the International Society of Feline Medicine (ISFM) as a resource for veterinary practitioners who want to better understand and manage the important clinical condition of house-soiling in their feline patients. The Guidelines offer straightforward, practical solutions that, in most cases, will help veterinarians and cat owners prevent, manage or entirely remediate feline house-soiling behavior.
Evidence base:
The Guidelines include scientifically documented information when it is available. However, because research is often lacking, some recommendations reflect the accumulated clinical experience of the authors.
Purpose of the Guidelines
We often hear the statistics: house-soiling is one of the most common feline behavior problems reported by cat owners and a major reason why owners relinquish cats to animal shelters. 1 According to the National Council on Pet Population Study and Policy, shelters in the US euthanize 72% of relinquished cats, 2 many because of house-soiling behavior. If 4–9 million cats are euthanized every year, this could be more than 10,000 cats each day. Veterinarians can decrease this number by helping to correct this commonplace problem. With this goal in mind, we have developed the AAFP and ISFM Guidelines for Diagnosing and Solving House-Soiling Behavior in Cats (hereafter referred to as the Guidelines).
The Guidelines provide clinicians with basic tools for educating cat owners about the prevention of house-soiling behavior. The Guidelines also apply the principles of the previously published AAFP and ISFM Feline Environmental Needs Guidelines, 3 which describe the physical setting where a cat can thrive. Importantly, these current Guidelines elaborate on elimination behavior, describe and illustrate the cat’s ideal litter box (also known as a litter tray), and discuss how it should be managed.

While prevention of house-soiling is ideal, practitioners see many cats with pre-existing house-soiling behavior. The Guidelines explain that, even though the pathophysiology and behavioral etiology of house-soiling is often multifactorial, a thorough chronological history and a systematic diagnostic approach to this problem can be the key to developing an effective treatment plan.
The Guidelines offer straightforward, practical solutions for practitioners and cat owners to implement, but are not intended to be a comprehensive treatise on feline behavior. The Guidelines’ authors recognize that feline house-soiling can be a complex problem. Although many cases are straightforward, individual cases can be challenging, sometimes frustrating, and occasionally beyond the expertise or experience of the general, primary care practitioner. In cases where an acceptable response does not occur within a time-frame mutually agreed upon by the veterinarian and client, consultation with a qualified behaviorist or internist is advisable.
In most cases, the Guidelines will help veterinarians and cat owners prevent, manage or entirely remediate feline house-soiling behavior. Effectively managing this common behavioral problem can reinforce veterinarian-client-patient relationships, improve the welfare of cats, and enhance the human-feline bond. These outcomes will ultimately help reduce the number of cats that owners abandon, relinquish or euthanize because of this challenging and emotionally charged issue.
Assessing the Cat that Displays House-Soiling Behavior
1 Use the patient’s history, determine that a house-soiling problem is present and consider possible causes
A house-soiling questionnaire will capture relevant information for the patient’s medical record (see Appendix 1, pages 595–596; and Supplementary Material listed on page 592). For clients who schedule an appointment for a house-soiling complaint, offer to send the questionnaire in advance or ask them to arrive early to complete the form. Some clients may not be aware that a problem exists and others may be embarrassed to discuss it, so ask every client specific questions at every examination in order to identify unap-parent house-soiling cases. The most important question to ask is, ‘Has your cat urinated or defecated somewhere in the house other than in the litter box?’ If the answer is ‘yes’ then obtain a more detailed history in the examination room or send the questionnaire home with the client and schedule a follow-up appointment.
When reviewing the history, pay particular attention to the timeline of the problem’s onset and how it progressed. Use the owner’s house floor plan diagram (requested as part of the questionnaire) to evaluate the extent and location of the feces or urine deposition. Also note whether the majority of incidents involve litter box management or are associated with issues regarding interactions among cats or between cats and people.
2 Perform a thorough physical examination (including a basic orthopedic and neurologic assessment) on every house-soiling cat
Basic findings such as a mild hair loss in the prepubic area may suggest bladder pain, while inflexible joints may limit a cat’s ability to access its litter box.
3 Perform additional tests or procedures as needed based on history and physical examination findings
For specific recommendations, see discussion on medial etiologies within the ‘Diagnosis of the four basic causes of house-soiling’ section (page 582).
4 Make a diagnosis
For the purposes of simplifying the diagnostic categorization of house-soiling cases, we recommend the following designations:
Medical etiologies (including urolithiasis, chronic kidney disease, urinary tract infections, diabetes mellitus, hyperthyroidism, arthritis, orthopedic etiologies and neoplasia).
Feline idiopathic cystitis (FIC).
Marking behavior.
Elimination related to primary environmental or social factors.
5 Formulate a treatment plan
First discuss the importance of an optimal litter box and fulfilling the five pillars of a healthy feline environment (see pages 585–587), even if the cat has a contributing or concurrent medical condition. Next formulate specific therapies as discussed in later sections.
6 Follow-up
Contact the owner on a routine basis to answer any questions that emerge. A phone call or e-mail within 2 weeks of the initial diagnosis can encourage an owner to work with the cat and the veterinarian to solve the house-soiling problem.
7 Evaluate progress, fine-tune your treatment plan, and refer the case for further management if necessary
In many cases, there may be more than one of the four house-soiling diagnostic categories (listed above under step 4) involved. Treating underlying medical conditions may not completely resolve house-soiling if it occurs as a result of adverse behavioral conditioning. The limitations of medical treatment in correcting house-soiling underscore the importance of non-medical interventions, especially maintaining optimal litter box facilities and addressing environmental and social factors that affect both marking and elimination behaviors. In select cases, rehoming to a more suitable environment should also be considered if environmental or social stressors cannot be removed or reduced sufficiently.

Diagnosis of the Four Basic Causes of House-Soiling
This section discusses diagnostic recognition of what are considered the four basic causes of feline house-soiling: medical etiologies, FIC, aberrant marking behavior, and elimination related to primary environmental or social factors. Because these causative factors sometimes coexist, they should all be considered in managing a house-soiling cat.
Medical etiologies
Any cat that is ill may exhibit behavioral changes, including house-soiling. If senior or geriatric cats present for house-soiling and have no history of this behavior, testing beyond the basics listed below, such as with chest radiographs or gastrointestinal profiles, may be of benefit.
Medical evaluation of urinary house-soiling
The following tests are components of an optimum diagnostic approach for cats that present for house-soiling with urine:
Urinalysis, including urine sediment examination Analyze the urine sample within 30–60 mins of collection to obtain the most reliable, accurate results, particularly when evaluating urine sediment. 4
Urine culture (cystocentesis required) If the urine of any cat is consistently dilute (specific gravity <1.030), evaluate a complete blood count (CBC) and biochemistry profile. For a mature patient (>8 years), also evaluate a thyroxine (T4) sample. 5
Abdominal radiographs (to include the entire lower urinary tract) In many studies, cystic calculi are diagnosed more often than bacterial cystitis, 6 so abdominal radiography is advisable.
Abdominal ultrasound (to include the entire lower urinary tract). 7
The above diagnostic baseline usually eliminates or confirms the presence of the following conditions:
Bacterial cystitis.
Urinary incontinence.
Radiopaque uroliths (struvite and calcium oxalate). Approximately 20% of cats with feline lower urinary tract disease (FLUTD) will have cystic calculi. 6
Polyuria or polydipsia.
Radiolucent uroliths and neoplasia. 7
If all diagnostic data are within normal limits, medical causes of house-soiling are unlikely. However, the patient could still have FIC because no diagnostic test is currently available for this condition.
Medical evaluation of fecal house-soiling
For cats presenting with a history of defecation outside a designated location, diagnostic testing will consider lifestyle factors, physical examination findings, and the duration and severity of clinical signs. The clinician should also determine whether the cat has chronic or acute constipation or diarrhea.
The following diagnostic tests are appropriate for cats that exhibit house-soiling by defecation:
Fecal examination Refer to the Companion Animal Parasite Council General Guidelines. 8 If fecal elimination is abnormal (eg, diarrhea or constipation), perform additional diagnostic evaluation (eg, feline pancreatic lipase immunoreactivity, vitamin B12/folate assays, abdominal imaging and/or endoscopic evaluation).
Digital rectal examination We strongly recommend using sedation or anesthesia for patient comfort and improved diagnostic accuracy.
CBC and biochemical profile ± T4.
The above diagnostic baseline may help to confirm or exclude the following diagnoses:
Intestinal parasites.
Arthritis, spondylosis.
Impacted anal glands.
Rectal strictures.
Organic causes of small- and large-bowel disease.
Some causes of fecal incontinence.
Additional blood work and imaging studies may be warranted in cases of constipation or diarrhea to evaluate the cat for underlying conditions such as kidney disease, hyperthyroidism and conformational abnormalities of the pelvis.
As with house-soiling involving urination, if all diagnostic values are within normal limits, aberrant marking behavior or elimination related to primary environmental or social factors are the most likely causes of house-soiling with stool.
Feline idiopathic cystitis
Pain or discomfort associated with FIC may cause a cat to exhibit house-soiling behavior (Figure 1). Cats are diagnosed with FIC when they have one or several episodes of FLUTD and a thorough diagnostic work-up finds no single etiology (ie, no stones, urinary tract infection, tumor or other physiologic causation). 9 Researchers are now looking beyond the bladder and considering the whole individual when evaluating these cases. 10 Currently, no single specific diagnostic test or marker will confirm FIC. 11
Figure 1.
Blood-tinged urine deposited by a cat with FIC in a urine-marking incident. Courtesy of Hazel Carney
FIC can be obstructive or non-obstructive in its presentation. It can also occur as a chronic disease. Urethral obstruction is more common in younger, overweight cats and in male cats, with no difference in prevalence for intact versus castrated males. 12 Excessive bodyweight, decreased activity, multiple cat households and indoor housing may increase the risk for FIC.13,14
Various forms of FIC exist. The disease may be self-limiting, wax and wane, or be chronic and persistent in some cats. 15 Problems associated with the bladder,16–18 nervous system, 19 endocrine system 20 and various other co-morbid disorders may occur concurrently. 21 Behavioral abnormalities such as increased startle responses, nervousness and excessive over- or under-attachment to owners may also be present. 22 It is hypothesized that some cats with FIC may have had adverse experiences early in life, sometimes in utero. 23
Treatment options for FIC are discussed on pages 586–589.
Marking behavior
A diagnosis of marking as the cause of house-soiling requires exclusion of medical etiologies, FIC, and elimination related to primary environmental and social factors. It also requires an understanding of why the cat marks. A house floor plan diagram that identifies doors and windows, resources, cat-to-cat interaction locations and areas of marking can be very useful in identifying sites where the house-soiling cat feels the need to leave evidence of its presence.
Cats in general avoid confrontation, so they communicate with other cats about when they were last at a given location by using olfactory and visual clues. A stressful environment often exacerbates marking behavior as well as FIC. 21 Reducing fear and anxiety decreases urine marking behavior and inter-cat aggression, as well as other negative results of chronic stress. 24 Cats mark in a variety of ways which owners may find objectionable (see box below).
Feline urine marking behavior
Urine spraying is a normal part of feline behavior. Typical characteristics of urine marking behavior include:
Posture From a standing position with the tail up and twitching, the cat deposits small amounts of urine on vertical surfaces (Figure 2). The cat may have a fixed stare or vacant facial expression. Some cats may occasionally squat and mark on horizontal surfaces as well.
Frequency It varies greatly and generally does not correspond with normal voiding intervals.
Volume Urine volume produced in marking varies but typically is small. The cat may continue to void normal amounts of urine in the litter box at normal intervals while marking outside of it.
Figure 2.

The cat displays urine marking behavior by depositing a small amount of urine on a vertical surface while standing with a raised tail. Courtesy of Hazel Carney
Urine spraying is either a sexual (associated with reproductive function) or a reactional behavior. 25 Intact male and female cats both exhibit sexual marking to advertise their presence and availability. Vocalization often accompanies sexual marking. Neutering intact animals dramatically reduces sexually related marking. However, approximately 10% of neutered male cats without lower urinary tract disease will persist in marking behavior, 26 and 4% of female neutered cats may continue to mark as well. 27
Reactional or anxiety-related marking occurs in response to a change in the cat’s environment, especially its core area where it eats, sleeps and plays. The cat marks to leave its own scent. Confident and anxious cats alike will exhibit marking behavior. Anxious cats mark to reduce their anxiety by making the affected area smell like themselves, which helps increase their confidence. Cats with FIC may urine mark, sometimes with bloody urine (Figure 1).28,29
Confident cats mark as a ‘calling card’ to denote their presence, but there is no evidence that the mark is intended to be threatening to other cats. Cats do not normally mark to cover another cat’s scent and will sniff the other cat’s mark without becoming agitated or fearful. They may then show a flehmen response. Within feline social groups, including human households, cats detect and identify a collective odor. 30 The collective odor is made up of all the scents, including those expressed by feline and human individuals, and by inanimate objects such as furniture and carpeting. Introduction of another pet, person, or new furniture or other objects into this environment changes the collective odor to some degree and can stress some cats enough to induce urine marking behavior.
Cats will frequently mark the same areas repeatedly. The urine odor changes with time and frequent marking keeps the odor more consistent. Frequently marked areas involve travel routes throughout the core home environment. Items that change in temperature, such as stoves, toasters and electronic equipment, are frequent marking targets. Articles accompanied by new scents, such as suitcases, backpacks and shoes, may also be marked. Marking behavior that starts at windows and doors usually suggests the perceived threat is coming from outside the home. Initial marking in stairways, hallways, doorways leading into rooms and the centers of rooms usually indicates stressors originating from within the household. Cat doors or flaps can sometimes trigger urine marking at those sites due to the perceived or actual threat of other cats entering into the household cat’s core environment.
Elimination related to primary environmental or social factors
A diagnosis of elimination related to primary environmental or social factors as the cause of house-soiling requires exclusion of medical etiologies, FIC and marking behavior. It also requires an understanding of normal feline elimination behavior (see box above). A house floor plan diagram that identifies litter box locations as well as house-soiling sites in relation to potential areas of cat-to-cat conflict, high traffic or noise can be very useful in diagnosing elimination due to environmental or social factors.
Overcrowding, social competition and adverse human interventions
In a multi-cat household, overcrowding or the presence of a ‘despot’ cat that monopolizes litter box resources may cause less confident cats to seek out inappropriate places for elimination.24,34 Some cats may avoid using a litter box that is placed in proximity to high traffic areas or near cat doors or flaps that are accessed by other cats. In general, cats need to be able to reach litter boxes without having to encounter other cats. Most cats prefer private places to eliminate rather than busy locations, and may need different locations for urinating and defecating. In some households, an insecure cat feels safest on the owner’s bed and may eliminate there instead of going to the litter box.
Litter box aversion can also be caused by counterproductive or inattentive human behavior. Examples include using the litter box as a site for administering medications, locating toileting areas near noisy appliances, and allowing children to trap a cat in the litter box for any reason. A cat may avoid the litter box if it associates toileting with any adverse stimuli or experiences. A soiled litter box may cause litter box aversion.
Treatment and Management Considerations for All House-Soiling Cases
Optimizing the litter boxes and fulfilling the five pillars of a healthy feline environment (see pages 586 and 587) will improve the interaction of cats within their environment, decrease potential sources of stress and, as a result, should prevent or decrease the frequency of house-soiling.
Designing the optimal litter box
The average cat eliminates approximately three to five times a day. 1 The design and management of the litter box are critical for encouraging acceptable toileting habits. When house-soiling occurs, always evaluate the litter box.
Litter box number and location
Households with a single cat should have two litter boxes in two separate locations. In multi-cat households, the historical rule of thumb is to have at least one more litter box than the total number of cats, although this is not an absolute requirement. Socially affiliated cats may be more willing to share litter boxes. Cats which are not socially affiliated should have separate litter stations. More litter boxes may be needed depending on the number of social groups and unaffiliated cats. At least one litter box should be placed at each level of a multilevel home. Consequently the guiding principle is to provide a sufficient number of litter boxes in multiple locations around the house so that each social group has an adequate number of toileting sites in different places.
Avoid placing food and water close to the litter box, as this discourages elimination in that location. Cats perceive litter boxes located adjacent to each other as one large box. Openings of adjacent litter boxes should not be facing each other, but should be positioned at right angles or around the corner from each other. This arrangement allows cats to exit the box and avoid an approaching cat.
If a litter box goes unused, the owner can remove it if other boxes are available and being used. If a cat is toileting away from its litter box, try placing the litter box at a new site until the situation is remedied. After the cat begins using its litter box, leave it in the same place for at least 2 weeks, even if the location is inconvenient for the client. After litter box utilization has become consistent, it may be possible to gradually move the box (several inches a day) to a location preferred by the human occupants of the house.
Litter box size
Research suggests that size of the litter box is as important as the number of boxes. In general, bigger is better. Unless the owner is able to inspect and remove soiled litter on a regular basis (at least once every 2 h to avoid odor build up), many commercial litter boxes prove to be too small. We recommend a rectangular litter box that is 1.5 times the length of the cat from nose to base of tail; in one study, adult cats preferred a box that was 34 x 15 inches (86 x 39 cm) over a smaller one. 35 If a large enough litter box is not available at the pet store, a home improvement store or department store can provide suitable alternatives. Examples include concrete mixing trays, sweater boxes and under-bed storage containers (Figures 3–5). The lids from the containers can be placed upright behind the litter box to protect the wall.
Figure 3.

This litter box is of adequate size and depth for an adult cat. The high back helps protect the wall. Courtesy of Vicky Halls
Figure 4.

A storage container with the side cut down for easy entry makes a good litter box. The low entry will facilitate use by an older cat or one with degenerative joint disease. Note placement of the lid behind the box to protect the wall. Courtesy of Kari Mundschenk
Figure 5.

A concrete mixing tray available at a local hardware store makes a good litter box. This one is made of heavy plastic, with a smooth surface and adequate depth and size (24 × 36 × 8 inches). Courtesy of Kari Mundschenk
Covered versus open litter boxes
Research has shown that cats are equally divided in their preference for large, covered litter boxes versus uncovered boxes. 36 The cat’s preference may be influenced more by regular cleaning than by whether the litter box is covered. Consequently, open boxes are recommended whenever possible to facilitate owner monitoring and frequent scooping. Small covered boxes may make it difficult for larger cats to posture normally for the purposes of elimination. Cats may avoid a covered box when it contains a scent or odor, but resume use once it is cleaned and has a neutral odor. An open box avoids trapping odors inside. A high-sided box provides some security and is effective at collecting urine for those cats that stand while urinating.
Regardless of design, the litter box opening should allow easy access. In multi-cat households, despot cats may prevent timid cats from accessing or exiting the litter box.
Litter
Cat litter is marketed to people, not to cats. Marketers appeal to cat owners by using product descriptions such as ‘less tracking’, ‘multi-cat’, ‘scented’, ‘organic’ and ‘natural’. Consequently, litter may have descriptions or attributes that appeal to humans but not to their feline companions. For example, cats often find aromatic litter and litter deodorizers offensive. No product reduces or removes the need to regularly clean and maintain litter boxes. Balancing on the edges of litter boxes with only one or two feet inside the box may indicate an aversion to the litter substrate or soiled litter. Cats without house-soiling problems tend to dig in the litter box before eliminating to a greater extent than house-soiling cats. 37 Cats vary in their preferences for litter depth. In most cases, the litter should consist of a fine, sand-like, non-scented, clumping material to a depth of at least 1.25 inches (3 cm). Avoid liners, slotted grills or deodorizing powders. For preference evaluation, provide multiple boxes with different litters and variable litter depths (Figure 6).
Figure 6.

A litter box test can determine which type the cat prefers. Variable litters, depths of litter and sizes of boxes are available for selection by the cat. Courtesy of Kari Mundschenk
Cats may prefer to use the same toileting substrate indoors that they use outdoors, namely soil or sand. You can gradually add the litter substrate of choice to the indoor litter box.
A cat that experiences discomfort in its paws due to a surgical procedure or other causes may develop a preference for certain types of litter. Try different litters until the cat indicates its preference.
Managing the litter box
Remove waste a minimum of once a day and add litter as needed. Wash the litter box every 1–4 weeks. Some behaviorists feel that weekly washing and replacing the litter is optimal. Others find that every 2–4 weeks does not compromise the cat’s response and is more readily accepted by owners. Rarely, because of a particularly difficult to control urinary tract infection, daily washing of the litter box may be recommended. Use soap and hot water only; avoid strong chemicals or any ammonia-based products.
Fulfilling the five pillars of a healthy feline environment
The AAFP and ISFM Feline Environmental Needs Guidelines describe in detail the ‘five pillars’ of a healthy feline environment that support the cat’s physical health, emotional wellbeing, and interaction with its human companions and with other animals. 3 Fulfilling all five feline environmental pillars is a fundamental strategy for preventing or correcting house-soiling behavior. The key elements of each of the environmental pillars, and how they can affect feline elimination behavior, are described on page 587.
Treatments for Specific Causes of House-Soiling
Medical etiologies
Address any medical condition you diagnose. Optimize the cat’s litter boxes and fulfill its environmental needs, which may change in response to its disease. For example, cats with degenerative joint disease may require a litter box with a very shallow opening (Figure 4). Because pain or weakness in convalescent cats may limit access to their favorite litter box, provide an alternative box closer to their recovery area. Debilitating conditions such as arthritis, muscle weakness and impaired vision can impede the ability of elderly cats to reach litter boxes that are located in basements or far from the cat’s core territory. In such cases, owners should be instructed to place litter boxes in more easily accessed areas. Placement of night lights and additional litter boxes close to sleeping areas will help minimize anxiety in older cats.
Feline idiopathic cystitis
The following modalities are commonly used to treat FIC:
Analgesics Narcotics such as oral buprenorphine (oral transmucosal) or a fentanyl patch may be effective. Note that butorphanol is usually not recommended for feline analgesia due to its short duration of effect. The choice of drug should be based on the severity of clinical signs.
Alpha antagonists Alpha antagonists (eg, prazosin or phenoxybenzamine) can be considered in male cats with obstructive FIC.
Meeting the cat’s environmental needs (See the AAFP and ISFM Feline Environmental Needs Guidelines. 3 ) A subset of these guidelines known as multimodal environmental modification (MEMO) therapy has been documented to significantly decrease clinical signs and increase the disease-free interval in cats with chronic FIC. The three most important modifications are optimal litter box management, increased owner interaction with the cat and client education. 38
Dietary management A canned diet may be helpful for some cats. Efforts to acidify the urine using dry foods have no demonstrated value in the treatment of cats with FIC. However, if pronounced struvite crystalluria is present in an obstructed male cat, consider using a diet formulated for struvite dissolution and prevention.
Antibiotics Do not use antibiotics unless you obtain a positive urine culture. For cats with previous urinary catheterizations, we recommend culture of urine collected by cystocentesis because these cats may be at increased risk for UTI. 29
Synthetic pheromones Use of synthetic pheromones can reduce or eliminate house-soiling behavior (see page 591). 28
FIC is a complex disease process that is not fully understood at this time. Careful disease management involving the owner can result in beneficial effects for the cat and improve veterinarian-client relationships. Because FIC can be a chronic, frustrating disease, excellent client communication in conjunction with MEMO therapy, including the environmental management recommendations discussed elsewhere in the Guidelines, analgesics, and other pharmacologic agents may be of benefit in treating acute and chronic cases. Some cats with an underlying predisposition for FIC may develop recurring clinical signs when exposed to a significant stressor.
Table 1 provides a comprehensive list of drugs that have been used for treatment of house-soiling, including dosage and administration recommendations. Many of these agents are not approved for feline use but have been used off-label in cats. Appropriate precautions should be observed for any off-label drug use. These agents have variable degrees of anecdotal success but little scientific evidence as to their efficacy. Do not use tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for treatment of acute FIC because they have little or no benefit for short-term resolution of clinical signs. Consider using TCAs and SSRIs only for recurrent, severe cases. Also, use these drugs only after environmental strategies, dietary changes and behavior modification have failed. Amitriptyline, a TCA, has been investigated in a non-placebo clinical trial, and may decrease clinical signs of severe, recurrent FIC when given long term; short-term usage may worsen the condition and is not recommended. 39 Anecdotal improvement has been reported in some cats treated with clomipramine, another TCA, in recurrent cases of FIC. Fluoxetine, a SSRI, has some efficacy in managing house-soiling. 27
Table 1.
Drugs that have been used for the treatment of house-soiling in cats
| Class of drug | Mechanism of action | Indications | Suggested dosage | Potential side effects | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drugs for cats with urethral obstruction | Prazosin (Minipress; Pfizer) | Alpha adrenergic antagonist | Inhibits α-1 adrenergic receptors | Functional urethral obstruction. Also ureteral obstruction | 0.25–1 mg/cat PO q8–12h | Sedation, hypotension |
| Tamsulosin (Flomax; Boehringer Ingelheim) | Alpha adrenergic antagonist | Inhibits α-1 adrenergic receptors | Functional urethral obstruction. Also ureteral obstruction | Doses are anecdotal: 0.004–0.006 mg/kg PO q24h | Sedation, hypotension | |
| Bethanechol (Urecholine; Barr/Duramed) | Parasympath-omimietic | Stimulates muscarinic receptors in the bladder | Detrusor atony | 2.5–5 mg/cat PO q12h | Vomiting, diarrhea, salivation | |
| Amitriptyline (Elavil; AstraZeneca) | TCA | NE reuptake inhibition; central and peripheral anticholinergic activity; antagonism of the H1 receptor; 5-HT reuptake inhibition; glutamate and Na+ channel receptor antagonist | Chronic FIC | 2.5–10 mg/cat PO q12–24h* | Sedation, weight gain, urine retention, urolith formation, anticholinergic effects | |
| Drugs considered for treatment of house-soiling | Clomipramine (Anafranil; Mallinckrodt) (Clomicalm; Novartis | TCA | NE and serotonin reuptake inhibition | Chronic FIC, urine marking | 0.25–1.3 mg/kg PO q24h* | Sedation, anticholinergic effects, urine retention; less anticholinergic effects than amitriptyline |
| Buspirone (BuSpar; Bristol-Myers) | Azapirone – serotonin 1A partial agonist | Blocks pre- and post-5-HT1A receptors; downregulates 5-HT2 receptors; moderate affinity for D2-dopamine brain receptors | Urine marking | 2.5–7.5 mg/cat PO q12h* | Rare sedation or other neurologic effects. Avoid use in cats aggressive to other cats (and marking). May help the ‘victim cat’ (that is marking). Should not be given in combination with MAOIs; can be given with TCAs and SSRIs | |
| Fluoxetine (Prozac; Eli Lilly) | SSRI | Strong inhibitor of serotonin reuptake and very weak inhibitor of NE reuptake | Chronic FIC,' urine marking | 0.5–1.3 mg/kg PO q24h* | Decreased food intake, inappetence at higher doses (so start low); vomiting and lethargy (rare); urine retention reported | |
| Paroxetine (Paxil; GlaxoSmithKline) | SSRI | Highly selective inhibitor of serotonin reuptake; weak effects on neuronal reuptake of dopamine and NE | Urine marking | 0.5–1.5 mg/kg PO q24h*. May be effective if given every other day | Decreased food intake, inappetence at higher doses (so start low); vomiting and lethargy (rare); urine retention reported | |
| Alprazolam (Xanax; Pfizer)† | Benzodiazepine – anxiolytic | Facilitates GABA in the CNS – binding to GABAA receptors | Urine marking | 0.0125–0.025 mg/kg PO q8h; 0.125–0.25 mg/cat PO q12h (low dose first to evaluate for paradoxical excitement) | Sedation, increased appetite, ataxia; paradoxical excitement (rare) | |
| Diazepam (Valium; Roche)† | Benzodiazepine – anxiolytic | Facilitates GABA in the CNS – binding to GABAA receptors | Urine marking | 0.1–1.0 mg/kg PO, IM or IV q4h* or less frequently as needed | Sedation, increased appetite, ataxia; paradoxical excitement (rare) | |
| F3 fraction of feline facial pheromone (Feliway; Ceva) | Synthetic pheromone | Alters emotional state of the animal via the limbic system and hypothalamus | Anxiety-related behaviors, chronic FIC | One spray in affected area once daily as needed, or room diffuser | None reported | |
| Megestrol acetate (Ovaban; Schering-Plough)‡; | Synthetic progestin | Anti-estrogen and glucocorticoid activity | Refractory cases of urine marking | 5 mg PO q24h × 5–7 days, then 1x/week; or 2 mg/kg/day PO × 5 days, then 1 mg/kg/day × 5 days, then 0.5 mg/kg/day × 5 days* | Adrenocortical suppression, adrenal atrophy, transient diabetes mellitus, mammary hypertrophy, neoplasia | |
| Drugs for treatment of urolithiasis | DL-Methionine | Sulfur-containing amino acid | Methionine metabolized and sulfate excreted in urine as sulfuric acid, thereby acidifying urine | For urine acidification when dietary management fails | 0.5–1 g PO on food q24h | Gastrointestinal distress, metabolic acidosis |
| Ammonium chloride | Acid-forming salt | Administration results in a decrease in serum bicarbonate and decrease in blood and urine pH | For urine acidification when dietary management fails§ | 20 mg/kg PO q12h | Gastrointestinal distress, metabolic acidosis |
Many of these agents are not approved for feline use but have been used off-label in cats (see text)
Start at low end of dosage range and increase as needed; use lowest effective dose
Some clinicians avoid use of diazepam because it has been reported rarely to cause fatal hepatopathy; other benzodiazepines may pose a similar risk
No one recommends this drug as a first-line treatment. Some behaviorists never use the drug because of its potentially very serious side effects. Other behaviorists offer it as a final alternative to euthanasia or rehoming because they have used it successfully based on experience and prior research data
Urinary acidifiers should only be used (1) in cats with a disease where this might benefit them such as struvite urolithiasis and (2) when diet alone under ad libitum feeding conditions does not produce the desired pH; (3) the cat should be monitored to ensure acidosis does not occur
TCA = tricyclic antidepressant, SSRI = selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, NE = norepinephrine, MAOI = monoamine oxidase inhibitor, 5-HT2 = 5-hydroxytryptamine, GABA = gamma-aminobutyric acid

Studies have shown that glycosaminoglycans (GAG) replacers such as pentosan polysulfate provide no significant benefits over placebo in treating FIC.19,40 However, GAG-treated and placebo cats that responded to treatment possibly did so by decreasing stress and increasing owner-cat interaction (‘placebo effect’).
Urine marking
A multifaceted approach using environmental modification, a cleaning regimen and, in some cases, psychopharmacology has the greatest chance of reducing urine marking. 41 The basic treatment plan for a urine marking cat includes four components:
Determine the most likely stimuli for this cat’s marking behavior.
Remove the cat’s need to mark, including elimination of marking ‘triggers’, cleaning urine-soiled areas that can stimulate marking, and gradually reintroducing cats to the home environment after an absence.
Modify the cat’s behavior by using positive reinforcement.
Use pharmacologic therapy, pheromone therapy and nutraceuticals, as appropriate.
Always use each of the first three components of the plan. Understand and explain to the owner that because urine marking is a normal behavior, modifying or eliminating it can be challenging – and sometimes impossible. This is especially true in cases where the owner cannot reduce the stress in a cat’s environment or if the cat’s temperament limits the success of behavior management techniques. In such cases, pharmacologic therapy may significantly decrease or eliminate urine marking.
Determine the most likely stimuli for marking behavior
Several resources are available that enable the veterinarian and pet owner to jointly determine what motivates the cat to urine mark. These indicators include the clinical presentation timeline on the patient’s history form, the house floor plan diagram that the owner provides, and information about the cat’s litter box location and design, physical environment, family interactions and cat-to-cat relationships.
Remove the need to mark
Optimizing litter box management decreases urine marking in some cats, especially females. 42 Improving the cat’s perceived core territory security and addressing its social needs will decrease the cat’s need to mark. 43 (See ‘Tips for improving a cat’s territorial security’, page 590.)
Remove marking ‘triggers’
Examples of ways in which marking triggers can be removed include:
Spaying or neutering to physiologically eliminate sexually related marking behavior.
Restricting the potential threat from other cats (roaming cats encroaching on the household can act as triggers). If the resident cat resides indoors only, using motion-activated water sprinklers will make the yard an unattractive space for unwanted feline visitors. Laying plastic carpet protectors upside down in front of sliding outside doors creates an uncomfortable surface for cats to contact and may help to dissuade other cats from sitting close to the house and intimidating residents.
Removing or blocking cat doors that allow roaming cats to enter the household, or using microchip- or magnet-operated devices to allow access only for designated individuals.
optimizing relationships with people and other cats within the home, and ensuring that the physical environment meets the cat’s natural behavioral needs, to minimize stress within the home.
Clean urine-marked areas frequently
Frequent cleaning will reduce a cat’s habit of refreshing its scent at a marking site. Many urine removal products are available, but they vary widely in efficacy. 46 Avoid using ammonia-based cleaners, which smell like urine to a cat. Chlorine-based products will remove odors from concrete and vinyl floors. Scrubbing the affected area with a 10% solution of biological washing powder (enzyme-based laundry detergent) to remove the protein content of urine, allowing the area to dry, and then spraying with isopropyl alcohol to remove the fat component is also effective. 47 Some experts recommend deterrents such as placing food bowls or noise makers, mouse traps or electronic pet training mats at urine-marked areas. These methods may be effective at stopping marking at those areas, but may result in urine marking at other locations and can induce other stress-related behaviors. Some experts avoid these approaches because deterrent strategies may create fear that can increase stress, stimulate marking at other locations, or trigger overgrooming, aggression or other unwanted behaviors.
Allow returning cats to regain the ‘group scent’
In a multi-cat household, allow cats returning to the home after an absence to regain the ‘group scent’ before encountering other cats. Place the returning cat in a separate room and rub it with clothing the owner has recently worn or with a hand cloth that has been in contact with an affiliate cat’s cheek scent gland area.
Modify the cat’s behavior by using positive reinforcement
Behavior modification efforts should focus on positive reinforcement of desired behaviors. Physically punishing the cat during or after spraying only creates stress and increases the motivation to spray. Punishment can lead to fear-related aggression and will almost always reduce the bond between the cat and owner. Punishment also tends to encourage urine marking in less obvious areas.
Use pheromones, drugs or nutraceuticals as adjunctive therapy
Pheromone therapy Studies indicate that environmental use of synthetic pheromones (see box, right) can result in up to 90% cessation or reduction in urine-spraying behavior. 41 This effect can last even after discontinuing use of the pheromone product. 48 Pheromones do not require oral administration, are non-sedative and non-systemic. After toileting facilities have been individualized for the cat’s preferences, adding a pheromone diffuser may make the litter box location more appealing.
Psychoactive drugs Intervention with psychoactive drugs can be extremely helpful in treating urine marking. Many psychoactive drugs take up to 4–6 weeks for a full effect to be seen. The hope of success that these drugs offer may encourage some cat owners to implement other changes while the drugs begin to take effect. Psychoactive drugs should be used only in conjunction with the other marking behavior strategies, and not as a substitute for them. There is no single perfect behavior-modifying drug appropriate for marking mitigation. Individual responses to these drugs vary significantly, so it may be advisable to evaluate more than one drug in treating individual patients. Fluoxetine, buspirone, clomipramine and paroxetine are often used as an initial treatment choice.26,40,49–52 If you are uncertain which agent to use, additional reading or consultation with a veterinary behaviorist will facilitate your selection.

Elimination related to primary environmental or social factors
Cats are individuals. Thus individualizing the litter box is an important aspect of the management of elimination related to environmental and social factors. By offering the cat choices in litter box design, location and maintenance, the pet owner can observe what the cat prefers and adjust the approach to litter box management accordingly. When a cat has access to a well-designed and maintained litter box in a location it prefers, elimination-related house-soiling should improve. More details about designing the optimal litter box are given on pages 585-586.
Additional Considerations for Management of House-Soiling Behavior
The concepts of behavior modification discussed in these Guidelines may influence your clinical recommendations for the management of individual cases of house-soiling. Expert opinions differ on the use of treats or attention as a reward for litter box usage because both the cat’s temperament and timing of the reward influence its effect. Similarly, the use of temporary confinement of a cat in a small room or cage with its preferred litter box and litter substrate is debated because various factors influence the cat’s view of this situation. To determine if reward-based training or confinement will benefit a house-soiling cat, primary care practitioners should consult with an experienced behaviorist who utilizes these techniques.
If possible, the house-soiling cat should have restricted access to sites that it has soiled. Methods for restricting access include using aluminum foil, plastic sheeting, double-sided sticky tape, carpet protectors turned upside down so that the rough nubs would contact the cat’s feet, or similar products. Placing catnip or pet toys in previously soiled areas may create positive associations that redefine soiling sites as places for play or enjoyment.
Client Education and Follow-Up
Regardless of its etiology (medical, FIC, marking behavior, or elimination related to environmental and social factors), correcting feline house-soiling is strongly dependent on providing the cat owner with guidance and support. The ‘Take-Home Instructions For Cat Owners’ (Appendix 2, pages 596–598; and Supplementary Material, see right for details) provides practical guidance that will enable clients to comply with the veterinarian’s instructions for corrective action. A critical aspect of correcting house-soiling behavior is the design of the litter box as the cat’s primary toileting site. The section on ‘Designing the optimal litter box’ on pages 585–586 of the Guidelines can also be used for client education to help cat owners maintain an accessible and appealing site for proper elimination. Follow-up by telephone or e-mail will help monitor progress and ensure timely intervention if problems arise.

Summary Points
The AAFP and ISFM have long recognized that feline house-soiling behavior is not a trivial condition. house-soiling can directly affect the human–cat bond, the veterinarian–client–patient relationship and the overall welfare of cats.
Feline house-soiling is emotionally taxing for the cat owner. It is important to offer the client encouragement and to manage expectations by explaining that resolution of house-soiling may take time.
This unwanted behavior is not due to spite or anger towards the owner, but because the cat’s physical, social or medical needs are not being met. If you help your client identify these causative factors and effectively address them, house-soiling behavior will cease or markedly decrease.
House-soiling can be a clinically challenging case for the practitioner. If the veterinarian cannot resolve the problem or offer referral to a specialist, the owner may abandon, relinquish or euthanize the cat.
For the general practitioner the Guidelines will help eliminate much of the confusion and ambiguity about house-soiling. They offer practical recommendations for the prevention, diagnosis and management of this commonplace problem in cat ownership.
Ultimately, the Guidelines can make the difference between whether a cat is kept in a home environment or loses its life.
Supplemental Material
Cat Owner Questionnaire in Spanish
Cat Owner Questionnaire in Italian
Cat Owner Questionnaire
Take-Home Instructions for Cat Owners
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the preview reading conducted by Dr Brent Varialle, a mixed animal practitioner, and Dr Alyson Coppens, a feline practitioner, who gave much needed encouragement by saying the Guidelines were practical for regular, if not daily, use. The authors also thank Mark Dana of the Kanara Consulting Group, LLC, for his technical contributions, Dr Donna Stephens Manley of the AAFP Guidelines Committee for her guidance, and Dr Ed Kanara for his cat-herding abilities. The title photograph on page 579 was kindly loaned by Dr Deb Givin.
Footnotes
Funding: The authors received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors for the preparation of these Guidelines.
Dr Terry Curtis is a key opinion leader for Elanco and Ceva. The other authors do not have any potential conflicts of interest to declare.
Contributor Information
Hazel C Carney, WestVet Emergency and Specialty Center, Garden City, ID 83617, USA Email: hcarney@westvet.net.
Tammy P Sadek, Kentwood Cat Clinic, Kentwood, MI 49512, USA Email: tsadekdvm@aol.com.
Terry M Curtis, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
Vicky Halls, Cat Behaviour Counsellor, PO Box 269, Faversham, Kent ME13 3AZ, UK.
Sarah Heath, Behavioural Referrals Veterinary Practice, Chester, Cheshire CH2 1RE, UK.
Pippa Hutchison, Positive Imprint, Kilcreggan, Argyll & Bute G84 0JS, Scotland.
Kari Mundschenk, Bay Hill Cat Hospital, FL 32819, USA.
Jodi L Westropp, University of California Davis, School of Veterinary Medicine, CA 95616, USA.
References
- 1. Beaver BV. Feline eliminative behavior. In: Feline behavior: a guide for veterinarians. 2nd ed. St Louis, MO: Saunders; 2003, p 131. [Google Scholar]
- 2. National Council on Pet Population Study and Policy. The top ten reasons for pet relinquishment to shelters in the United States. www.petpopulation.org/topten.html (accessed June 19, 2013).
- 3. Ellis SL, Rodan I, Carney HC, Heath S, Rochlitz I, Shearburn LD, et al. AAFP and ISFM feline environmental needs guidelines. J Feline Med Surg 2013; 15: 219-230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Albasan H, Lulich JP, Osborne CA, Lekcharoensuk C, Ulrich LK, Carpenter KA. Effects of storage time and temperature on pH, specific gravity, and crystal formation in urine samples from dogs and cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 222: 176-179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Pittari J, Rodan I, Beekman G, Gunn-Moore D, Polzin D, Taboada J, et al. AAFP senior care guidelines. J Feline Med Surg 2009; 11: 763-778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Buffington CA, Chew DJ, Kendall MS, Scrivani PV, Thompson SB, Blaisdell JL, et al. Clinical evaluation of cats with nonobstructive urinary tract diseases. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1997; 210: 46-50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Wilson HM, Chun R, Larson VS. Clinical signs, treatments, and outcome in cats with transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder: 20 cases (1990-2004). J Am Vet Med Assoc 207; 231: 101-106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Companion Animal Parasite Council. CAPC general guidelines. http://www.capcvet.org/capc-recommendations/capc-general-guidelines (2011, accessed October 17, 2013).
- 9. Westropp JL, Buffington CA. Feline idiopathic cystitis: current understanding of pathophysiology and management. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2004; 34: 1043-1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Buffington CAT, Westropp JL, Chew DJ. From FUS to Pandora syndrome. Where are we, how did we get here, and where to now? J Feline Med Surg 2014; 16: 385-394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Rubio-Diaz DE, Pozza ME, Dimitrakov J, Gilleran JP, Giusti MM, Stella JL, et al. A candidate serum biomarker for bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis. Analyst 2009; 134: 1133-1137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Segev G, Livne H, Ranen E, Lavey E. Urethral obstruction in cats: predisposing factors, clinical, clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis. J Feline Med Surg 2011; 13: 101-108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Cameron ME, Casey RA, Bradshaw JW, Waran NK, Gunn-Moore DA. A study of environmental and behavioural factors that may be associated with feline idiopathic cystitis. J Small Anim Pract 2004; 45: 144-147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Defauw PA, Van de, Maele I, Duchateau L, Polis IE, Saunders JH, Daminet S. Risk factors and clinical presentation of cats with feline idiopathic cystitis. J Feline Med Surg 2011; 13: 967-975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Birder LA, Barrick SR, Roppolo JR, Kanai AJ, de Groat WC, Kiss S, et al. Feline interstitial cystitis results in mechanical hypersensitivity and altered ATP release from bladder urothelium. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2003; 285: F423-429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Birder LA, Ruan HZ, Chopra B, Xiang Z, Barrick S, Buffington CA, et al. Alterations in P2X and P2Y purinergic receptor expression in urinary bladder from normal cats and cats with interstitial cystitis. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2004; 287: F1084-1091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. March P, Teng B, Westropp J, Buffington T. Effects of resinifer-atoxin on the neurogenic component of feline interstitial cystitis. Urology 2001; 57: 114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Chew DJ, Bartges JW, Adams LG, Kruger JM, Buffington CAT. Randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of pentosan poly-sulfate sodium for treatment of feline interstitial (idiopathic) cystitis [abstract]. J Vet Intern Med 2009; 23: 690. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Westropp JL, Kass PH, Buffington CA. Evaluation of the effects of stress in cats with idiopathic cystitis. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67: 731-736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Westropp JL, Welk K, Buffington CA. Small adrenal glands in cats with feline interstitial cystitis. J Urol 2003; 170: 2494-2497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Buffington CA. Comorbidity of interstitial cystitis with other unexplained clinical conditions. J Urol 2004; 172: 1242-1248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Hague DW, Stella JL, Buffington CA. Effects of interstitial cystitis on the acoustic startle reflex in cats. Am J Vet Res 2013; 74: 144-147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Buffington CA. Idiopathic cystitis in domestic cats - beyond the lower urinary tract. J Vet Intern Med 2011; 25: 784-796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Levine ED. Feline fear and anxiety. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2008; 38: 1065-1079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Dehasse J. Feline urine spraying. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1997; 52: 365-371. [Google Scholar]
- 26. Tynes V, Hart B, Pryor P, Bain MJ, Messam LL. Evaluation of the role of lower urinary tract disease in cats with urine marking behavior. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 223: 457-461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Hart BL, Cliff KD, Tynes VV, Bergman L. Control of urine marking by use of long-term treatment with fluoxetine or clomipramine in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005; 226: 378-382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Gunn-Moore DA, Cameron ME. A pilot study using synthetic feline facial pheromone for the management of feline idiopathic cystitis. J Feline Med Surg 2004; 6: 133-138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Martinez-Ruzafa I, Kruger JM, Miller R, Swenson CL, Bolin CA, Kaneene JB. Clinical features and risk factors for development of urinary tract infections in cats. J Feline Med Surg 2012; 14: 729-740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Heath S. Feline housesoiling. Proceedings World Small Animal Veterinary Association; 2007, Aug 19-23; Sydney, Australia. www.ivis.org. [Google Scholar]
- 31. Borchelt P, Voith V. Elimination behavior problems in cats. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1986; 8: 197-207. [Google Scholar]
- 32. Overall KL. Feline elimination disorders. In: Clinical behavior medicine for small animals. St Louis, MO: Mosby, 1997, pp 160-194. [Google Scholar]
- 33. Macdonald DW, Apps PJ, Carr GM, Kerby G. Social dynamics, nursing coalitions, and infanticide among farm cats, Felis catus. Adv Ethology 1987; 28: 1-64. [Google Scholar]
- 34. Neilson J. Thinking outside the box: feline elimination. J Feline Med Surg 2004; 6: 5-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Guy NC, Hopson M, Vandestichel R. Litterbox size preference in domestic cats (Felis catus). J Vet Behav 2014; 9: 78-82. [Google Scholar]
- 36. Grigg E, Pick L, Nibblett B. Litter box preference in cats: covered versus uncovered. J Feline Med Surg 2012; 15: 280-284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Sung W, Crowell-Davis S. Elimination behavior patterns of domestic cats (Felis catus) with and without elimination behavior problems. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67: 1500-1504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Buffington CA, Westropp JL, Chew DJ, Bolus RR. Clinical evaluation of multimodal environmental modification (MEMO) in the management of cats with idiopathic cystitis. J Feline Med Surg 2006; 8: 261-268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Kruger JM, Conway TC, Kaneene JB, Perry RL, Hagenlocker E, Golombek A, et al. Randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of short-term amitriptyline administration for treatment of acute, nonobstructive idiopathic lower urinary tract disease. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 6: 749-758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Gunn-Moore DA, Shenoy CM. Oral glucosamine and the management of feline idiopathic cystitis. J Feline Med Surg 2004; 6: 219-225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Mills D, Redgate S, Landsberg G. A meta-analysis of studies of treatments for urine spraying. PLoS ONE 2011; 6: e18448. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Pryor PA, Hart BL, Bain MJ, Cliff KD. Causes of urine marking in cats and effects of environmental management on frequency of marking. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001; 219: 1709-1713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Crowell-Davis SL, Curtis TM, Knowles RJ. Social organization in the cat: a modern understanding. J Feline Med Surg 2004; 6: 19-28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Overall K. Diagnosing feline elimination disorders. Vet Med 1998; 93: 360-362. [Google Scholar]
- 45. Heath SA. Feline house-soiling and marking behaviours. In: Bowen J, Heath SA. (eds). Behavioural problems in small animals. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders, 2005, pp 185-203. [Google Scholar]
- 46. Beaver B, Terry M, LaSagna C. Effectiveness of products in eliminating cat urine odors from carpet. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1989; 194: 1589-1591. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Heath S. How I treat urine spraying in cats. Proceedings World Small Animal Veterinary Association; 2013, March 6-9, Aukland, New Zealand. Available on Veterinary Information Network, vin.com [Google Scholar]
- 48. Ogata N, Takeuchi Y. Clinical trial of a feline pheromone analogue for feline urine marking. J Vet Med Science 2001; 63: 157-161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Overall K. Paradigms for pharmacological use as a treatment component in feline behavioral medicine. J Feline Med Surg 2004; 6: 29-42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Pryor P, Hart B, Cliff K, Bain M. Effects of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor on urine spraying behavior in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001: 219: 1557-1561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Landsberg GM, Wilson AW. Effects of clomipramine in cats presented for urine marking. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2005; 41: 3-11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. King J, Steffan J, Heath S, Simpson BS, Crowell-Davis SL, Harrington LJ, et al. Determination of the dosage of clomipramine for the treatment of urine spraying in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2004; 225: 881-887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Cat Owner Questionnaire in Spanish
Cat Owner Questionnaire in Italian
Cat Owner Questionnaire
Take-Home Instructions for Cat Owners













