Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 28;72(4):549–553. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1542_23

Table 4.

Outcomes of subgroup analysis

Group 1
26–28 mm
Group 2
>28–30 mm
Group 3
>30 mm
MAE±SD MedAE MAE±SD MedAE MAE±SD MedAE
Holladay 1 0.33±0.31 0.21 0.37±0.32 0.31 0.44±0.33 0.33
Haigis 0.36±0.26 0.35 0.36±0.33 0.28 0.44±0.36 0.36
SRK/T 0.30±0.27 0.24 0.39±0.37 0.27 0.48±0.38 0.38
HFQ 0.34±0.30 0.27 0.40±0.38 0.28 0.46±0.34 0.34
Olsen 0.37±0.32 0.25 0.32±0.26 0.27 0.40±0.35 0.35
Hill RBF 3.0 0.38±0.35 0.23 0.29±0.23 0.24 0.34±0.28 0.28
Barrett universal II 0.45±0.37 0.41 0.31±0.26 0.24 0.43±0.34 0.40
Kane 0.34±0.35 0.23 0.31±0.27 0.23 0.38±0.29 0.32
Emmetropia Verifying Optics 2.0 0.37±0.35 0.24 0.32±0.26 0.27 0.39±0.30 0.33

The overall refractive outcomes of patients in different axial length groups obtained by each formula. HFQ=Hoffer Q, Hill RBF=Hill Radial Basis Function, MAE=mean absolute error, MedAE=median absolute error, SD=standard deviation, SRK/T=Sanders Retzlaff Kraff/Theoretical