Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 12;6(5):708–720. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2024.01.001

Table 2.

Summary-of-findings table

Outcome Certainty of evidence Effect estimate
RR (95% CI) Absolute difference, per 1000
DOAC-based dual-pathway therapy vs triple-antithrombotic therapy in AF after PCI or medically-managed ACS
 MACE Moderate 1.12 (0.97–1.28) 8 more (from 2 fewer to 19 more)
 Death Moderate 1.07 (0.88–1.30)
 Stent thrombosis Moderate 1.55 (1.02–2.36) 4 more (from 0 to 9 more)
 Major bleed High 0.62 (0.52–0.73) 23 fewer (from 16 to 29 fewer)
OAC monotherapy vs OAC plus single antiplatelet in AF plus remote (> 1 y) ACS/PCI
 MACE Very low, 0.91 (0.58–1.41)
 Death Very low, 0.85 (0.37–1.92)
 Stent thrombosis Low 5.03 (0.24–104.37)
 Major bleed High 0.66 (0.49–0.91) 22 fewer (from 6 to 33 fewer)

ACS, acute coronary syndrome; AF, atrial fibrillation; CI, confidence interval; DOAC, direct OAC; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; OAC, oral anticoagulation; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; RR, risk ratio.

Rated down 1 category for serious imprecision.

Rated down 1 category for serious inconsistency.

Rated down 2 categories for very serious imprecision.