Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 4;24:1495. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19006-7

Table 3.

Logistic regression analysis of occupational MWF aerosols exposure, noise exposure, and prevalence of CKD

Variables Case/Prevalence Model 1 Model 2
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
MWF aerosols (mg/m3)
 Nonexposed 20 (1.7) 1.00 1.00
 Exposed 55 (3.5) 2.12 (1.15–3.92) * 2.03 (1.21–3.41) *
Cumulative exposure dose (mg/m3-day)
 < 0-0.39 10 (2.2) 1.00 1.00
 0.4–0.45 10 (2.8) 1.28 (0.53–3.12) 1.23 (0.50–2.99)
 0.46–0.48 18 (4.1) 1.89 (0.86–4.14) 1.86 (0.85–4.08)
 0.49–1.40 17 (5.0) 2.34 (1.06–5.18) * 2.23 (1.01–4.95) *
Noise [dB(A)]
 Nonexposed 22 (1.9) 1.00 1.00
 Exposed 53 (3.4) 1.83 (1.10–3.02) * 1.77 (1.06–2.96) *
 < 0-84.85 9 (2.0) 1.00 1.00
 84.86–89.70 9 (2.7) 1.32 (0.57–3.90) 1.38 (0.50–3.11)
 89.71–91.96 18 (4.3) 2.16 (1.01–4.87) * 2.36 (1.23–5.38) *
 91.97-105.19 18 (5.0) 2.54 (1.13–5.73) * 2.66 (1.18–6.03) *

Model 1: unadjusted; Model 2: Adjusted for physical exercise, smoking and drinking; *P < 0.05