Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 21;42(3):211–220. doi: 10.1159/000538399

Table 4.

Summary of RCT evidence for PPI use-reduction strategies

Strategy for PPI use-reduction Study description Outcome Results
Lowering dose Systematic review (2017) of patients with mild to moderate GORD [10, 53] Recurring upper GI symptoms 49% lacked symptom control with maintenance dose versus 43% continuing PPI at healing dose
• 5 RCTs (n = 1,912) No statistical difference
• 12 months RR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.93 to 1.44
Abrupt stopping RCT of patients (aged ≥65 years) with healed oesophagitis; abrupt stopping (placebo) versus maintenance dose PPI (n = 105) [9] Recurring upper GI symptoms 68% lacked symptom control with abrupt cessation versus 22% continuing PPI
• 6 months RR 3.02, 95% CI: 1.74 to 5.24
Tapering dose and then stopping RCT of patients using daily PPI for upper GI symptoms; tapering versus abrupt stopping (n = 97) [55] Restarting PPI 69% restarted PPIs with tapering versus 78% stopping abruptly
12 months Not statistically significant; no relative risk provided
On-demand PPI (stop PPI; if symptoms return, use PPI daily until symptoms controlled, then stop) Systematic review (2017) of patients with mild to moderate GORD [9] Recurring upper GI symptoms 16% lacked symptom control with on-demand versus 9% continuing PPI
• 5 RCTs (n = 1,653) RR 1.71, 95% CI: 1.31 to 2.21
• 3–6 months
Switch to H2RA Systematic review (2017) of patients with reflux oesophagitis and reflux-like symptoms [10, 53] Recurring upper GI symptoms 39% lacked symptom control when switching to H2RA versus 21% continuing PPI
• 3 RCTs (n = 468) RR 1.92, 95% CI: 1.44 to 2.58

Table adapted from Farrell et al. [53] and Boghossian et al. [9].

CI, confidence interval; GI, gastrointestinal; H2RA, histamine H2-receptor antagonists; PPI, proton pump inhibitor; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RR, relative risk.