ABSTRACT
The composition of the human gut microbiome has been observed to change over the course of an individual’s life. From birth, it is shaped by mode of delivery, diet, environmental exposures, geographic location, exposures to medications, and by aging itself. Here, we present a narrative review of the gut microbiome across the lifespan with a focus on its impacts on aging and age-related diseases in humans. We will describe how it is shaped, and features of the gut microbiome that have been associated with diseases at different phases of life and how this can adversely affect healthy aging. Across the lifespan, and especially in old age, a diverse microbiome that includes organisms suspected to produce anti-inflammatory metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids, has been reported to be associated with healthy aging. These findings have been remarkably consistent across geographic regions of the world suggesting that they could be universal features of healthy aging across all cultures and genetic backgrounds. Exactly how these features of the microbiome affect biologic processes associated with aging thus promoting healthy aging will be crucial to targeting the gut microbiome for interventions that will support health and longevity.
KEYWORDS: Gut microbiome, aging, age-related disease, microbiome-based theraputics
Introduction
The gastrointestinal microbiome is the collection of some 101 bacterial cells that reside within the human gastrointestinal tract representing more cells that are contained within the human body, and a metagenome (combined genome of these commensal organisms) that is far larger than the human genome.2 This community of organisms has been observed to change over the lifespan ,3 , .4,5 Machine-learning-based analysis of published gut microbiome datasets could predict a subject’s chronologic age within 5.9 years, although this study was conducted largely independent of any health information.6 A cross-sectional study across the lifespan (age 1 to over 100) in a Japanese population showed a characteristic microbiome within infants and young children prior to weaning, then a transition to a more diverse microbiome associated with introduction of solid foods. This diverse and dynamic microbiome develops until early adulthood and then becomes relatively stable when it begins to show a decline in diversity after peaking late in life (around 65) and becoming more pronounced in individuals older than 80 years.4 An Italian study of individuals across the mirrored many of these findings including a unique microbiome among young children with characteristic taxa and relatively low diversity, and then a transition to a more diverse, adult microbiome in adolescents. They also observed microbiome signatures that became more unique to the individual at extremes of age7 which may reflect the microbiome becoming tailored to the individual’s diet and living environment that perhaps varies less at extremes of age. Intriguingly, very long-lived individuals (over 100 years old) have shown a distinct gut microbiome profile with greater diversity a high abundance of health-associated taxa such as Christensenellaceae and Akkermansia7. Although the gut microbiome changes across the lifespan, there are features that have been associated with diseases that develop at different phases of life and contribute to the development of age-related disease later in life. Of particular interest are the microbiomes of “super-agers” who reach extremes of age in relatively good health and have the potential to offer insights into how the microbiome can affect longevity and resistance to age-related diseases. Some summaries of the findings of microbiome features associated with very old adults are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Summary of studies of microbiome features associated with healthy aging in very old cohorts.
| Study Subjects | Microbiome Findings | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Older adults 70–82 examining cohorts with and without underlying chronic disease | Higher abundance of Akkermansia muciniphila by 16s rRNA sequencing | Singh et al. (2019) |
| A subset of much larger cohorts comprising individuals 85 year and older living in the community | Unique microbiomes enriched in rare taxa by 16s rRNA sequencing and increased serum concentrations of microbial metabolites of aromatic amino acids | Wilmanski et al. (2021) |
| Comparison between older adults and centenarians | Increased abundance of metabolic pathways associated with tryptophan metabolism by metagenomic sequencing | Rampelli et al. (2013) |
| Comparisons between young adults and cohorts up to semisupercentenarians | Increased metabolic pathways associated with xenobiotic degradation, decreased pathways associated with carbohydrate metabolism by metagenomic sequencing in older cohorts | Rampelli et al. (2020) |
| Comparison between centenarians and young adults living in rural India | Higher bacterial richness and increase in Prevotella strains by 16s rRNA sequencing and higher concentration of neurotransmitter related metabolites in stool | Tuikhar et al. (2019) |
| Comparisons between young adults and cohorts up to semisupercentenarians | Increased abundance of Christensenellaceae and Akkermansia in the oldest cohort by 16s rRNA sequencing | Biagi et al. (2016) |
The microbiome in infancy and childhood and impacts on health later in life
The development of the gut microbiome may begin before birth as the fetus is likely exposed to microbial metabolites from the mother, if not actual bacterial communities, in utero .8 At birth, there is a major transfer of microbiota from mother to baby that is greatly affected by the mode of delivery (vaginal vs. cesarean section).9 The transfer of microorganisms continues and is affected by whether the baby is breast or formula fed10 with bacterial species possibly being directly transmitted through breast milk.11 In a large international longitudinal study of young children, breast-fed infants show a distinct microbiome compared to formula-fed infants, with higher abundances of Bifidobacterium and pathways associated with fatty acid biosynthesis.12 The next major transition in the microbiome occurs as solid food is introduced and the child is weaned from breast milk or formula.12,13 The microbiome is now influenced by diet and the environment to which the child is exposed. For example, exposure to household disinfectants early in life was associated with a higher abundance of Lachnospiraceae and subsequently the development of higher body mass index in a study of a Canadian cohort.1 The make-up is also affected by other variables in the environment, such as siblings and pets.12
The composition and acquisition of the microbiome early in life is of great interest because it is thought to affect the development of diseases later in life.14 The microbiome may be affected by prenatal exposures15 and starting at birth, vaginal delivery versus cesarean section (c-section) has large impacts on early microbiome. Children born by c-section show early acquisition of more skin flora and facultative anaerobes and have delayed acquisition of obligate anaerobic organisms. These obligate anaerobes produce microbial products typically associated with a healthy microbiome like short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs).16 SCFAs are produced through fermentation of non-digestible carbohydrates and are thought to be an important microbial metabolite that may have beneficial effects across the lifespan.5 SCFAs are thought to shift immune cells toward an anti-inflammatory profile17 and have been implicated as protecting against a wide range of diseases.18 Although many c-section delivered infants “catch up” in terms of acquiring these organisms, there may be changes in the composition of anaerobic organisms that persist even into adulthood.19 Some taxa within the family Bacteroidaceae, shown to vary between c-section and vaginal delivery group, were also associated with reduced head-circumference growth, an early marker of cognitive development, that also likely has long lasting consequences into adulthood.20
Differences in the gut microbiome taxa have been noted in infants and young children who develop life-long diseases that include eczema,21 asthma,22 and type 1 diabetes.23 Many of these childhood diseases are related to a disordered immune response, and the microbiome is thought to play a role in early immune system development that could prevent the development of autoimmune diseases as well as inflammatory bowel diseases later in life.14 Indeed, the presence of SCFA producing organisms appeared to be protective when comparing children who developed type 1 diabetes to those who did not.24 The abundance of genes for the production of a lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a highly inflammatory component of the outer membrane of Gram negative bacteria,25 and the concentration of microbial products such as secondary bile acids and amino acids were higher in the gut microbiomes of infants who went on to develop atopy and asthma.22
Exposures that affect the microbiome, such as antibiotics or the lack of a varied and healthy diet, unquestionably impact the microbiome of children and can be seen in reduced diversity and increased pathobionts, organisms that contribute to maladaptive process such as stunted growth and inflammation.26,27 This can impact development of disease later in life as well. This was illustrated by a study of a cohort of children from the UK that examined risk of development of inflammatory bowel disease. This analysis showed that there was an increased risk of inflammatory bowel disease in those with exposure to antibiotics active against anaerobes and that the risk was greater if the child was treated at a younger age.28 A study of a separate cohort from the USA showed antibiotic exposure within the first 2 years of life was associated with a wide range of diseases including allergic/inflammatory conditions like asthma, atopic dermatitis, metabolic disease including obesity, and even attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.29
A summary of characteristics, influences, health associated features and potential pathologic features of the gut microbiome among infants and young children is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Influences, characteristics, and potential health impacts of the gut microbiome among infants and children.
Adult microbiome
The adult microbiome appears to be highly personalized and stable and does not drastically change with short-term variations in diet.30 In general, among adults, a diverse gut microbiome that contains a large number of species (high diversity) as well as high abundance of numerous species (high evenness) is healthy and robust one.31,32 Microbiome diversity may signal more than just the absence of disease as elite athletes have been shown to have more diverse microbiomes.33
Although the established adult microbiome is observed to be fairly stable, external factors, likely primarily diet,34 affect the composition of the adult microbiome over the longer term. This is well illustrated by the study of adult immigrants to the USA from Asia which compared microbiome profiles of immigrants, and the children of immigrants, to individuals from the same ethnic group in their country of origin.35 This study showed a shift in the microbiome that correlated with the duration of time the individual had been a resident of the USA, including a loss of overall diversity and loss of abundance of Prevotella strains associated with metabolizing fiber, and an increase in Bacteroidetes. The longer a subject had been a resident of the USA, the more similar their gut microbiome was contemporary US residents. In this study, diet of study subjects was significantly, although not entirely, associated with the shift toward contemporary USresidents, suggesting that diet was an important component of this change, but not solely responsible. Dietary patterns have also been associated with increased abundance of health associated taxa and a decrease in potential pathobionts. An 8-week intensive dietary intervention based on the Mediterranean Diet36 leads to increases in abundance of health associated taxa like Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, an SCFA producing organism frequently cited as being associated with positive health markers,37 and a decrease in Rumminococcus gnavus, a potential inducer of gut inflammation.38
Physical activity can also alter the microbiome at both a taxonomic level and with respect to microbial metabolites.39 Adults with an active lifestyle tend to show higher diversity and abundances of health-associated taxa than sedentary adults.40 The microbiomes of professional athletes also showed an increased abundance of metabolic pathways associated with SCFA production compared to sedentary controls.41 The gut microbiome may also be able to determine how an individual responds to a physical activity-based intervention, in a study of 39 individuals with pre-diabetes, response to the intervention in terms of fasting blood glucose was associated shifts in microbial taxa and metabolic pathways, while those who did not respond to the intervention resembled sedentary controls.42 It is worth noting that interventional studies examining the effect of exercise on the microbiome have shown that positive changes are dependent on ongoing activity and are lost once activity is ceased.39 In older adults specifically, physical activity-based interventions can cause an increase in health-related taxa but do not impact broad diversity measures.43
During adulthood, specific taxa and overall microbiome diversity are associated with markers of good health and protection against the development of chronic health conditions. An adult’s weight is also correlated with the development of many chronic conditions, and microbiome features have been identified that correlate with obesity.44 A higher Firimicutes to Bacterodetes ratio has been consistently reported as being associated with obesity.44 A higher microbiome diversity has also been associated with less weight gain over the lifespan.45 Among adults, the genus Christensenellaceae has been correlated with good metabolic health including lower body mass index,46 healthy serum lipid profiles,47 and reduced adipose tissue.48 The genus Prevotella is thought to be involved in metabolizing fiber, often lacking in Western diets, and determine if an individual will respond favorably to a dietary intervention increasing their intake of fiber.49 F. prausnitzii was also found to be higher in abundance in lean individuals.50 Correlations between the composition of the gut microbiome and numerous conditions that develop during this phase of life have been reported on including, cardiovascular disease,51,52 kidney disease,53 and type 2 diabetes.54 The risk for these disease increases with age, and they contribute to the development of age-related diseases later in life.55 Age-related disease are those that occur later in life such as dementia and malignancies and are thought to be related to, although not necessarily dependent on, the biological aging process.56 Specific dementia syndromes like Alzheimer’s disease are also associated co-morbidities that develop in this phase of life such as cardiovascular disease.57
The older adult microbiome and healthy aging
Compared to younger individuals, studies conducted on older adults in the USA and Europe tend to have lower overall taxonomic diversity within their microbiomes and have higher abundances of Bacteroidetes.3,58,59 When very old adults’ (90 years of age and older) microbiomes are examined, the make-up of the microbiome is likely highly dependent on the health status of the individual, with healthy-longer lived individuals showing unique microbiome signatures.60 This suggests an age-related deterioration of the microbiome similar to the age-related decline of other biologic process. This general age-related shift in the microbiome is distinct from co-incident health conditions.61 It has been suggested that there are microbial taxa associated with healthy aging, and that loss of these may represent “taxonomic milestones” that contribute to or accompany physiologic decline and subsequent age-related disease.62 A summary of the potential exposures that contribute to a gut microbiome that reflects healthy aging as opposed to one that reflects age-related disease and salient microbiome features of these two states is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Influences and characteristics of the adult microbiome and factors influencing transition to a healthy or age-related disease older adult microbiome.
Although age itself likely contributes to changes in the gastrointestinal microbiome, it is also greatly impacted by the environment in which an individual lives and ages. An exploration of data from metagenomic sequencing of microbiome samples across Europe, Africa, North and South America showed that there were distinct features of each geographic area throughout the lifespan.7 Much of the literature notes changes in taxa with age that tends to be conserved across different areas of the world. There are, however, notable differences depending on the region in which the study was undertaken. Studies of cohorts in Italy63 and Ireland64 have shown decreased abundances of Roseburia with aging, while studies cohorts in Korea65 and China66 have reported increases in this genus. Bacteroidetes are generally described as increasing with age, but the converse was observed among healthy older Indonesians.67 A study of healthy centenarians from India and comparing them with studies previously mentioned from Italy, China, and Japan found unique features in the Indian population such as lower Bacteroidetes, higher Enterobacteriaceae among the Indian cohort.68 Akkermansia, usually associated with healthy aging, was associated with frailty in a cohort of Chinese older adults.69 These discrepancies highlight the extremely complex relationship between the gut microbiome and aging, which is affected not only by the myriad interactions between the host-specific organisms in the microbiome, but also the diet and environment in which the individual ages. In an attempt to examine relationships between aging across published datasets, Ghosh et al. examined 21,041 fecal microbiomes across seven different datasets representing Europe, North and South America, and Asia.70 They identified a higher Kendal Uniqueness score, which is characterized by a loss of typically dominant microbiome taxa and an increase in subdominant taxa, as associated with unhealthy aging. They also identified taxa that were associated with a higher Uniqueness score, including members of Klebsiella, Ruminococcus, and Clostridium genera were generally those reported as being associated with dysbiosis and an unhealthy gut microbiome. Taxa that were negatively associated with the Uniqueness score, including members of Corprococcus, Akkermansia and Faecalibacterium, were generally those that are associated with good health and healthy aging. This highlights that there are recurring microbiome trends across geography and cultures that are associated with healthy aging.
Diet and the living environment of an individual can cause shifts in the microbiome.34,35,71 The environment that older adults occupy in society varies across region and socio-economic status. In lower and middle income countries, older adult care is often managed by family units within the community,72 although this is changing with increasing economic development.73 In the developed world, a significant portion of older adults will live at least some part of their life within a long-term residential medical facility or nursing home.74 In the USA, the longer an individual lives, the greater chance they have of spending part of their life in a nursing home.75 This context is important to consider when examining the results of microbiome analysis from older adults in different parts of the world.
Insights into what causes shifts away from health-associated taxa and diversity as an individual ages have come from examining the microbiome of older adults shifts when they enter a nursing home, typically associated with a decline in health. Lower microbiome diversity and an increase in the abundance of potential pathogens is seen in older adults who reside in nursing homes3,64 These individuals also tend to have more chronic health conditions compared to community-dwelling older adults.76 The observed shift from a community-dwelling adult’s microbiome to a microbiome that resembles a resident of a long-term facility occurs over the course of a year residing in a facility.58 Nursing home residents followed over time also show gradual decreases in commensals associated with SCFA production such as F. prausnitzii and increases in pathobionts like Veilonella parvula .77 These shifts are to be likely partially attributable to dietary changes that occur when an individual enters long-term care where diets are typically lower in fiber.64 Older adults who reside in nursing homes are very frequently hospitalized and treated with antibiotics.78 Antibiotics can have a profound and long-lasting effect on the microbiome, notably a reduction in microbial diversity.79 As a potential direct consequence of this, the microbiome can come to harbor an increased abundance of pathobionts and antibiotic-resistant pathogens that can later cause difficult to treat infections.80,81 This may also lead to a microbiome that is more favorable to pathogen colonization, such as Clostridiodies difficile colonization.82 Older adults who are colonized or suffering from C. difficile colitis show increases in pathobionts and decreases in beneficial commensals that share some similarities with changes described more generally with aging.83,84
The degradation or “unhealthy aging” of the microbiome may not be an inevitable process, as illustrated by studying individuals who stay healthy as they age. A large cross-sectional cohort in China showed that healthy young adults and healthy older adults had very similar microbiome profiles even when extended to ages beyond 94 years.85 In some studies, healthy long-lived individuals have a higher gut microbiome diversity even than younger individuals86,87 suggesting that a healthy microbiome can contribute to resistance to age-related disease, and hence, longevity. With regard to specific taxa, a higher abundance of Akkermanisa, generally reported to decrease as individuals age,88,89 has been associated healthy aging.90 Christensenellaceae may be another genus that contributes to healthy aging and longevity, although it generally declines as an individual ages, but has been observed in high abundance in very long-lived individuals (greater than 100 years of age).63 Among very long-lived individuals (centenarians and super centenarians) studies across geographic regions have documented high diversity and abundance of Lachnospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae, and Akkermansia ,91 all thought to be beneficial taxa. A high species richness (number of bacterial species represented), especially among the family Ruminococcaceae, may also be conserved feature across the long-lived cohorts.68 A 2018 cohort of cognitively healthy centenarians recruited in the Netherlands included a study of the microbiome of this cohort, the results are yet to be published at the time of this review, but could hold important insights into the features of these so-called “super-agers”.92 There have also been associations between microbiome features and specific age-related diseases. Alistipes, a genus whose abundance has been described as increasing with age,93 has been associated with dementia.94
With increasing age, older adults can develop decreased resilience to stressors like acute illness or injury, which is conceptualized as frailty.56 Frailty is a multi-domain functional status which includes chronic disease burden as one dimension related to global wellbeing and function of the individual.95 Frailty is typically measured as an ordinal score by geriatric health care providers with scores meant to describe anywhere from a very fit individual to one who is terminally ill.96 A longitudinal study of older adults has shown a decrease in F. prausnitzii and increases Eggerthella and Eubacteria, associated with increasing frailty.97 An examination of the gut microbiome of residents from a nursing home found decreased Lachnospiracea, usually considered a beneficial taxa, and increased abundance of R. gnavus,89 previously mentioned as proinflammatory. A study of community dwelling older adults in South Korea found non-significant decreases in alpha diversity and decreases in species of Prevotella copri, a genus associated with fermentation of fiber, and Corprococcus eutactus, a potential SCFA producing organisms, were associated with increasing frailty.98
A finding that has been quite consistent among the studies of age-related disease is decreased microbiome diversity,89,97 but it is important to point out that associations with certain taxa are not always consistent across studies. Corprococcus has generally been associated with healthy aging70,99 but was also decreased in a cohort that stayed healthy into very advanced age.100 Ruminococcus is a genus that contains members that produce SCFAs and are thought to be anti-inflammatory101 were seen to be increased in abundance in centenarians,68 but also has members associated with frailty.89,102 Lachnospiracea, usually reported as being associated with healthy aging, was associated increased BMI in children.1 This likely reflects two issues with research into the gut microbiome among humans: 1) its observational nature and 2) a general lack of understanding of mechanistic insights into how the microbiome impacts specific health outcomes. Because majority of research on aging and the gut microbiome is observational it is impossible to know if unseen variables are confounding the association between specific taxa and positive outcomes. Microbiome research is making progress into the mechanisms by which the gut microbiome impacts specific process, which we discuss in the next section. Understanding these mechanisms will be crucial to harnessing the microbiome for treatment.
Gut microbiome and immune system implications
An important consideration is how changes or “degradation” of an aging microbiome may impact biologic processes that are associated with aging. Many characteristic age-related diseases are thought to be related to chronic low levels of inflammation; a hypothesis known as “inflammaging”.55 Inflammation has been shown to be associated with a wide variety of diseases whose risk increases with age such as cardiovascular disease,103 metabolic syndrome,104 and chronic kidney disease.105 The inflammation associated with aging also impacts physiologic process, such as muscle protein synthesis and insulin sensitivity, that can lead to sarcopenia and contribute to frailty.106 The burden of these diseases accumulates contributes to the development of dementia and frailty as an individual ages.
Inflammation associated with aging likely drives changes the gut environment to some extent and drives changes in the microbiome.91 Higher levels of inflammation have been associated with specific taxa in the microbiome such as potentially pathogenic organisms belonging to Escherichia and Klebsiella among older adults.107 Similar species are prominent in the highly-inflamed environment of the gut in sufferers of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.108 These taxa are potential pathogens and have strategies to survive immune effectors109 that may be present in a highly inflamed environment, may also promote inflammation leading to positive feedback that reinforces this environment.110 There are also taxa that are thought to be anti-inflammatory. Originally discovered in Crohn’s disease patients as being associated with a decreased risk of disease recurrence, F. prausnitzii has demonstrated strong anti-inflammatory effects in vivo .111 This species is also decreased in older adults with cognitive impairment due to the systemic pro-inflammatory environment in these patients.112 Studies of older adults and super-agers that have reached the extremes of aging have shown microbiome features that are associated with elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines,69,107 potentially anti-inflammatory bioactive metabolites,113 and decreased expression of genes important in limiting the inflammatory response to commensal organisms.94,114 Studies linking microbiome features with measures that impact systemic inflammation specifically among older adults are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2.
Summary of studies examining interaction between the gut microbiome and inflammation in older adults.
| Study Subjects | Microbiome Findings | Immune/Inflammatory Findings |
|---|---|---|
| Gong et al. 2023 30 long lived (greater than 90 years) 25 Old elderly (75–80) 75 Young Elderly (60–74) 15 Middle Age (Less than 59) |
Decreased abundance of butyrate producing members of the Clostrida class, increased abundance of Kleibsiella was correlated with increasing age | Measurement of fecal metabolites across different groups showed an increased abundance of a thromboxane analogue among long lived individuals that stimulated phagocytosis and an anti-inflammatory phenotype in microglia in vitro |
| Haran et al. 2019 108 older adult residents of nursing homes |
Increased abundance of Bacteroides, Alistipes, Odoribacter, Barnesiella, and decreased abundance of Lachnoclostridium among older adults with a diagnosis of dementia | Decreased expression of p-glycoprotein in intestinal epithelial cell cultures when treated with stool supernatants from subjects with a dementia diagnosis |
| Xu et al. 2021 94 community dwelling older adults residing in the community |
Increased abundance of Akkermansia, Parabacteroides, and Klebsiella and lower levels of the Faecalibacterium, Prevotella, Roseburia, Megamonas, and Blautia among frail individuals | Increased serum levels of IL-6 was seen among frail adults and was specifically associated with the abundance of Escherichia/Shigella, Pyramidobacter, Alistipes, and Akkermansia |
| Biagi et al. 2010 21 centenarians 43 older adults (59 to 78 years) 20 young adults (25 to 40) |
Increased abundance of Proteobacter including Escherichia, Proteus, and Kleibsiella with increasing age | Elevated levels of IL-6 and IL-8 associated with pathobionts and potentially pathogenic organisms |
One mechanism by which the gut microbiome impacts systemic inflammation may be impacting gut permeability. Increased intestinal permeability, usually measured by examining concentration of tight junction proteins or microbial products in serum, is hypothesized to lead to increased translocation of microbial products leading to inflammation.115 A small study of older adults with dementia found higher biomarkers of intestinal permeability associated with a diagnosis of dementia.116 Higher biomarkers of intestinal permeability have also been shown to be associated with increasing frailty.117 A decrease in SCFA producing organisms is usually associated with increasing intestinal permeability. It is thought that SCFAs are an energy source for healthy colonocytes118 and stimulate the maintenance of intestinal barrier function119 and this may be one mechanism for how they decrease systemic inflammation.
A seemingly contradictory immune process to inflammaging, immunosenescence, in which the aging immune system shows a decreased ability to respond effectively to pathogens,120 may also be influenced by the gut microbiome. A study of a middle aged and older adults in China showed microbiome features such as richness and abundance of Akkermansia were positively associated with higher circulating levels of IgG and IgA.121
The metabolic capacity of the gut microbiome and health aging
Although taxonomy is a useful metric to examine microbiome composition, the functional metabolic capacity and metabolome represents what the collective microbiome’s functional capacity is, and metabolites produced by or modified by the gut microbiome can either interact locally within the gut or circulate and effect distant biologic process.122 This functional microbiome also changes as individuals age, as measured by abundance of genes representing metabolic pathways.123 The microbial-derived metabolites produced by the gastrointestinal microbiome, acting either locally or systemically are likely to determine a large number of host-microbiome interactions.124 This can be measured through serum metabolites thought to be modified or produced by the gut microbiome125 or directly measuring metabolites in the stool.113 As previously mentioned, SCFAs are a major metabolite produced by microbiota are thought to be anti-innflammatory17,126 and thus may counteract inflammation and inflammaging in the older adult. SCFAs are primary products of microbial fermentation of fiber, as this is the indigestible carbohydrate that reaches the large intestine.127 Diet has long been described as contributing to inflammation, with diets rich in fiber, such as the Mediterranean diet described as decreasing inflammatory markers.128 Older adults in microbiome studies, especially those in long-term care facilities, tended to have lower fiber diets,64 suggesting that a loss of SCFA producing bacteria may be diet-related. It has been suggested that a loss of SCFA producing bacteria contributes to inflammation in older adults123 and many of the beneficial taxa previously mentioned including Akkermansia and Christensenellaceae are potential short-chain fatty acid producing organisms.63,88,89 A cross-sectional study in China suggested that it may not just be loss of SCFA production capacity, but that an aging microbiome also had increased abundance of pathways associated with SCFA degradation, and this was associated with an increased abundance of pathobionts.129
Microbial metabolism of compounds in the diet also likely impacts health- and age-related disease. Polyphenols, antioxidant compounds typically found in nuts, fruits, and chocolates, are extensively metabolized by the gut microbiomes into compounds that may have greater bioavailability or distinct effects.130 A dietary intervention to supplement polyphenols in the diet of older adults showed decreases in measures of gut permeability and levels of inflammatory cytokines and markers of intestinal permeability. The gut microbiome can metabolize choline and phosphatidylcholine, primarily from animal products in the diet, to produce trimethylamine and subsequently trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) which promotes atherosclerotic vascular disease.131 A study of a cohort in Germany suggested that microbial pathways were significantly contributing to serum TMAO and that TMAO levels and microbial pathways associated with TMAO synthesis increased with age.132 TMAO serum concentrations have also been inversely correlated with scores on cognitive neuropsychiatric test scores in older adults.133 Microbial breakdown products of aromatic amino acids have also been associated with atherosclerotic disease.122 In a study of familial long-lived individuals in China, distinct signatures of fecal metabolites were noted in long-lived individuals (greater than 90).113 One metabolite in particular, an analogue of the prostaglandin thromboxane A2, was enriched in families that tended to have long-lived individuals and showed pro-phagocytotic and potentially anti-inflammatory effects on central-nervous system derived phagocytes in vitro.113 However, thromboxane A2 can also be a mediator of thrombotic events due to cardiovascular disease,134 so the overall benefit of this metabolite is unclear. Another study, performed in China, showed that older members of the cohort had an increased abundance of LPS biosynthetic pathways129 and increased LPS production within the gut could contribute to previously discussed inflammaging.
Intriguingly, the gut microbiome may also function to mitigate environmental exposures, when examining supercentenarians specifically, older adults showed increased abundance of metabolic pathways associated with xenobiotic chemical degradation, suggesting that the microbiome may influence how an individual responds to exposure to external toxins such as carcinogens.135 A cohort of rural India also showed a decrease in the concentration of cyclohexanecarboxylic acid, an environmental contaminant, in the stool of centenarians compared to young people, and the authors hypothesized that the gut microbiota may be metabolizing it in the older individuals68 and hence mitigating any potential toxicity.
When interpreting much of these data, it is important to take into account that pathways does not always correlate with abundance of produced metabolites,136 indicating that there is yet more layers or complexity between the host and gut microbiome underlying how it might affect aging more broadly. Another method of examining metabolic potential is using proteomics to examine abundance of proteins present in the microbiome as opposed to gene content only. A recent proteomics-based study revealed a very high degree of correlation between age and a decreasing abundance of proteins involved in indole and tryptophan biosynthesis within the microbiome.137 Clearly, there is substantial work to be done to determine what functional components of the gut microbiome contribute most to healthy aging, and the mechanisms by which they exert their effect (systemic absorption of metabolites, immune interaction, local effects on gut physiology, etc.).
Microbiome-gut brain axis
The “microbiota-gut-brain axis”, the relationship between the brain and commensal bacteria of the gut, offers a promising avenue for badly needed interventional therapies in neurodegenerative disorders. This area of study was initiated in antibiotic-treated and germ-free mice that has demonstrated a role for the gut microbiome in neurogenesis, myelination, and maintenance of blood-brain-barrier integrity.138–140 Many neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer’s disease, one of the most devastating in this category, have been linked to differences in the composition of gut microbiota,94,141,142 suggestive of a role in neurodegenerative disease processes.143,144
Recently, the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease and other cognitive disorders has been linked to microbes, either causing infections or colonizing the body, as a trigger in the development of neuroinflammation.145–147 This process has become a key thematic framework for Alzheimer’s disease.148 For example, it has been shown that blood levels of LPS correlate with the extent of observed brain amyloidosis in Alzheimer’s disease patients.149 In Alzheimer’s disease patients, lower serum concentrations of primary bile acids and increased microbial produced secondary bile acids levels have been shown150 while increases in specific secondary bile acids, such as deoxycholic acid, are strongly associated with cognitive decline.151 In the brain tissue of Alzheimer’s disease patients, secondary bile acids not explained by human pathways have been measured,152 suggesting that these abnormal secondary bile acids originate from the gut microbiome and translocate to the brain. These are just a few examples in an ever expanding and complex field of study.
Multi-omics and medical microbiome therapeutics for aging
The association between the gut microbiome and healthy aging suggests that the microbiome may represent a modifiable risk factor for health decline in older adults. However, interventions aimed at the microbiome have had mixed results. Dietary interventions on frailty with microbiome measures as part of the intervention have been performed. The most reported is the “Nu Age” trial, a multi-center one-year intervention of community dwelling older adults treated with a dietary intervention based on the Mediterranean Diet did show an impact on microbiome features, such as increases in health associated taxa such as F. prausnitzii, and that these microbiome features were associated with better scores on objective measures of frailty like grip strength and neuropsychiatric scores.128 While encouraging, these measures primarily disease-oriented outcomes and there was no significant effect on cognition.153 Clearly much work is needed with dietary interventions.
Probiotics, that is, administration of specific health associated bacteria taxa, in the treatment of frailty have often shown positive changes in biomarkers and microbiome features, but often lack significant patient-oriented outcomes.154 Targeting the microbiome specifically with probiotics for treatment of dementia has yielded improvements in biomarkers associated with cardiovascular health but no meaningful effect on cognition.155 The microbiome’s ability to transform specific nutrients, or prebiotics, may also be important to the success of a dietary intervention. To specifically attempt to effect microbial metabolites, there are numerous studies of specific non-digestible carbohydrates that are the hypothesized to be substrates for the production of SCFAs and preferred energy sources for SCFA producing organisms. These often show effects on specific biomarkers or microbial taxa, but again usually not on patient-oriented outcomes.156
Probiotics, prebiotics, dietary interventions alone usually do not show large impacts on aging-related diseases like dementia157 or frailty.158 There are many potential reasons for this. Beneficial strains may not colonize all individuals who receive a probiotics; an intensive study of a probiotic cocktail in volunteers showed that certain individual’s microbiomes may also be “resistant” to colonization by beneficial commensals, and that the abundance of these strains decreases over time.159 It may be that shifts in the microbiome alone driven by diet and prebiotics may not be sufficient to drive changes in deteriorating health associated with aging. As previously mentioned, many of the mechanisms behind positive associations of microbiome features and hallmarks of healthy aging still being explored. Perhaps, it is not surprising that microbiome-based interventions have not yielded consistent positive results when we do not know what specific pathways and processes are being targeting with these interventions. With better mechanistic understanding from in vitro and animal model systems or interventional trials, more effective microbiome-based interventions may come in the future.
Another explanation may be that the microbiome may need to be targeted along with other interventions aimed at improving health. As the ability to collect, manage, and analyze increasingly large and complex datasets evolves, multidimensional or “multi-omics” approaches to defining biological age160 and aging-related phenomenon like dementia161 are emerging. In this context, the gut microbiome likely represents a dimension of aging process in combination with immune function, organ system health, genetics, and so on.162 This may be why, as previously mentioned, a single intervention targeting the microbiome may not be particularly effective, but multi-domain studies that combine interventions including diet, exercise, cardiovascular risk factor modification have shown promise163,164 and studies of the impact of these multi-domain interventions on the gut microbiome with be forthcoming.165 Decades of research examining the relationship between the gut microbiome and aging has suggested that it can impact the health of humans as they age and represents a promising target to promote healthy aging. A better mechanistic understanding of how this occurs in healthy older adults and how it fits in with the aging process will be key to making microbiome health a cornerstone of longevity and healthy aging as we suspect it will be in the future.
Funding Statement
The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
References
- 1.Tun MH, Tun HM, Mahoney JJ, Konya TB, Guttman DS, Becker AB, Mandhane PJ, Turvey SE, Subbarao P, Sears MR. et al. Postnatal exposure to household disinfectants, infant gut microbiota and subsequent risk of overweight in children. CMAJ. 2018;190(37):E1097–19. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.170809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zhu B, Wang X, Li L. Human gut microbiome: the second genome of human body. Protein Cell. 2010;1(8):718–725. doi: 10.1007/s13238-010-0093-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jeffery IB, Lynch DB, O’Toole PW. Composition and temporal stability of the gut microbiota in older persons. Isme J. 2016;10(1):170–182. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Odamaki T, Kato K, Sugahara H, Hashikura N, Takahashi S, Xiao J-Z, Abe F, Osawa R. Age-related changes in gut microbiota composition from newborn to centenarian: a cross-sectional study. BMC Microbiol. 2016;16(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0708-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nagpal R, Mainali R, Ahmadi S, Wang S, Singh R, Kavanagh K, Kitzman DW, Kushugulova A, Marotta F, Yadav H. et al. Gut microbiome and aging: Physiological and mechanistic insights. Nutr Healthy Aging. 2018;4(4):267–285. doi: 10.3233/NHA-170030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Galkin F, Mamoshina P, Aliper A, Putin E, Moskalev V, Gladyshev VN, Zhavoronkov A. Human Gut Microbiome Aging Clock Based on Taxonomic Profiling and Deep Learning. iScience. 2020;23(6):101199. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mancabelli L, Milani C, De Biase R, Bocchio F, Fontana F, GA Lugli, Alessandri G, Tarracchini C, Viappiani A, De Conto F, Nouvenne A. Taxonomic and metabolic development of the human gut microbiome across life stages: a worldwide metagenomic investigation. mSystems. 2024;e01294–01223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rautava S, Luoto R, Salminen S, Isolauri E. Microbial contact during pregnancy, intestinal colonization and human disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;9(10):565–576. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2012.144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dominguez-Bello MG, Costello EK, Contreras M, Magris M, Hidalgo G, Fierer N, Knight R. Delivery mode shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(26):11971–11975. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002601107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Castanys-Munoz E, Martin MJ, Vazquez E. Building a Beneficial Microbiome from Birth. Adv Nutr. 2016;7(2):323–330. doi: 10.3945/an.115.010694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jost T, Lacroix C, Braegger CP, Rochat F, Chassard C. Vertical mother–neonate transfer of maternal gut bacteria via breastfeeding. Environ Microbiol. 2014;16(9):2891–2904. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Stewart CJ, Ajami NJ, O’Brien JL, Hutchinson DS, Smith DP, Wong MC, Ross MC, Lloyd RE, Doddapaneni H, Metcalf GA. et al. Temporal development of the gut microbiome in early childhood from the TEDDY study. Nature. 2018;562(7728):583–588. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0617-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Koenig JE, Spor A, Scalfone N, Fricker AD, Stombaugh J, Knight R, Angenent LT, Ley RE. Succession of microbial consortia in the developing infant gut microbiome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108 Suppl 1(supplement_1):4578–4585. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000081107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tamburini S, Shen N, Wu HC, Clemente JC. The microbiome in early life: implications for health outcomes. Nat Med. 2016;22(7):713–722. doi: 10.1038/nm.4142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Midya V, Agrawal M, Lane JM, Gennings C, Tarassishin L, Torres-Olascoaga LA, Eggers J, Picker M, Peter I, Faith JJ, et al. Prenatal metal exposures and childhood gut microbial cliques are associated with elevated fecal calprotectin in late childhood. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4764788. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Skillington O, Mills S, Gupta A, Mayer EA, Gill CIR, Del Rio D, O’Riordan KJ, Cryan JF, Ross RP, Stanton C. et al. The contrasting human gut microbiota in early and late life and implications for host health and disease. Nutr Healthy Aging. 2021;6(3):157–178. doi: 10.3233/NHA-210129. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Smith PM, Howitt MR, Panikov N, Michaud M, Gallini CA, Bohlooly-Y M, Glickman JN, Garrett WS. The Microbial Metabolites, Short-Chain Fatty Acids, Regulate Colonic Treg Cell Homeostasis. Science. 2013;341(6145):569–573. doi: 10.1126/science.1241165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.van der Beek CM, Dejong CHC, Troost FJ, Masclee AAM, Lenaerts K. Role of short-chain fatty acids in colonic inflammation, carcinogenesis, and mucosal protection and healing. Nutr Rev. 2017;75(4):286–305. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuw067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nagpal R, Yamashiro Y. Gut Microbiota Composition in Healthy Japanese Infants and Young Adults Born by C-Section. Ann Nutr Metab. 2018;73 Suppl 3(Suppl. 3):4–11. doi: 10.1159/000490841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Oliphant K, Ali M, D’Souza M, Hughes PD, Sulakhe D, Wang AZ, Xie B, Yeasin R, Msall ME, Andrews B. et al. Bacteroidota and Lachnospiraceae integration into the gut microbiome at key time points in early life are linked to infant neurodevelopment. Gut Microbes. 2021;13(1):1997560. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1997560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Abrahamsson TR, Jakobsson HE, Andersson AF, Björkstén B, Engstrand L, Jenmalm MC. Low diversity of the gut microbiota in infants with atopic eczema. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;129(2):434–440, 440 e431–432. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.10.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Arrieta M-C, Stiemsma LT, Dimitriu PA, Thorson L, Russell S, Yurist-Doutsch S, Kuzeljevic B, Gold MJ, Britton HM, Lefebvre DL. et al. Early infancy microbial and metabolic alterations affect risk of childhood asthma. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(307):ra307152–ra307152. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aab2271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Knip M, Siljander H. The role of the intestinal microbiota in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2016;12(3):154–167. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2015.218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Vatanen T, Franzosa EA, Schwager R, Tripathi S, Arthur TD, Vehik K, Lernmark Å, Hagopian WA, Rewers MJ, She J-X. et al. The human gut microbiome in early-onset type 1 diabetes from the TEDDY study. Nature. 2018;562(7728):589–594. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0620-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Beutler B, Du X, Poltorak A. Identification of Toll-like receptor 4 (Tlr4) as the sole conduit for LPS signal transduction: genetic and evolutionary studies. J Endotoxin Res. 2001;7(4):277–280. doi: 10.1177/09680519010070040901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Robertson RC, Manges AR, Finlay BB, Prendergast AJ. The Human Microbiome and Child Growth – First 1000 Days and Beyond. Trends Microbiol. 2019;27(2):131–147. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2018.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.McDonnell L, Gilkes A, Ashworth M, Rowland V, Harries TH, Armstrong D, White P. Association between antibiotics and gut microbiome dysbiosis in children: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut Microbes. 2021;13(1):1–18. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1870402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kronman MP, Zaoutis TE, Haynes K, Feng R, Coffin SE. Antibiotic exposure and IBD development among children: a population-based cohort study. Pediatrics. 2012;130(4):e794–803. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Aversa Z, Atkinson EJ, Schafer MJ, Theiler RN, Rocca WA, Blaser MJ, LeBrasseur NK. Association of Infant Antibiotic Exposure with Childhood Health Outcomes. Mayo Clin Proc. 2021;96(1):66–77. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.07.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Johnson AJ, Vangay P, Al-Ghalith GA, Hillmann BM, Ward TL, Shields-Cutler RR, Kim AD, Shmagel AK, Syed AN, Walter J. et al. Daily Sampling Reveals Personalized Diet-Microbiome Associations in Humans. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;25(6):789–802 e785. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lloyd-Price J, Abu-Ali G, Huttenhower C. The healthy human microbiome. Genome Med. 2016;8(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13073-016-0307-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sommer F, Anderson JM, Bharti R, Raes J, Rosenstiel P. The resilience of the intestinal microbiota influences health and disease. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15(10):630–638. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Clarke SF, Murphy EF, O’Sullivan O, Lucey AJ, Humphreys M, Hogan A, Hayes P, O’Reilly M, Jeffery IB, Wood-Martin R. et al. “Exercise and associated dietary extremes impact on gut microbial diversity.” Gut. 2014;63(12):1913–1920. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.David LA, Maurice CF, Carmody RN, Gootenberg DB, Button JE, Wolfe BE, Ling AV, Devlin AS, Varma Y, Fischbach MA. et al. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2014;505(7484):559–563. doi: 10.1038/nature12820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Vangay P, Johnson AJ, Ward TL, Al-Ghalith GA, Shields-Cutler RR, Hillmann BM, Lucas SK, Beura LK, Thompson EA, Till LM. et al. US Immigration Westernizes the Human Gut Microbiome. Cell. 2018;175(4):962–972 e910. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Meslier V, Laiola M, Roager HM, De Filippis F, Roume H, Quinquis B, Giacco R, Mennella I, Ferracane R, Pons N. et al. Mediterranean diet intervention in overweight and obese subjects lowers plasma cholesterol and causes changes in the gut microbiome and metabolome independently of energy intake. Gut. 2020;69(7):1258–1268. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lopez-Siles M, Duncan SH, Garcia-Gil LJ, Martinez-Medina M. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii: from microbiology to diagnostics and prognostics. Isme J. 2017;11(4):841–852. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Henke MT, Kenny DJ, Cassilly CD, Vlamakis H, Xavier RJ, Clardy J. Ruminococcus gnavus, a member of the human gut microbiome associated with Crohn’s disease, produces an inflammatory polysaccharide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(26):12672–12677. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1904099116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Allen JM, Mailing LJ, Niemiro GM, Moore R, Cook MD, White BA, Holscher HD, Woods JA. Exercise Alters Gut Microbiota Composition and Function in Lean and Obese Humans. Medicine And Science In Sports And Exercise. 2018;50(4):747–757. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Bressa C, Bailén-Andrino M, Pérez-Santiago J, González-Soltero R, Pérez M, Montalvo-Lominchar MG, Maté-Muñoz JL, Domínguez R, Moreno D, Larrosa M. et al. Differences in gut microbiota profile between women with active lifestyle and sedentary women. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(2):e0171352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Barton W, Penney NC, Cronin O, Garcia-Perez I, Molloy MG, Holmes E, Shanahan F, Cotter PD, O’Sullivan O. The microbiome of professional athletes differs from that of more sedentary subjects in composition and particularly at the functional metabolic level. Gut. 2018;67(4):625–633. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Liu Y, Wang Y, Ni Y, Cheung CKY, Lam KSL, Wang Y, Xia Z, Ye D, Guo J, Tse MA. et al. Gut Microbiome Fermentation Determines the Efficacy of Exercise for Diabetes Prevention. Cell Metab. 2020;31(1):77–91 e75. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Aya V, Jimenez P, Munoz E, Ramirez JD. Effects of exercise and physical activity on gut microbiota composition and function in older adults: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2023;23(1):364. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04066-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Crovesy L, Masterson D, Rosado EL. Profile of the gut microbiota of adults with obesity: a systematic review. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2020;74(9):1251–1262. doi: 10.1038/s41430-020-0607-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Menni C, Jackson MA, Pallister T, Steves CJ, Spector TD, Valdes AM. Gut microbiome diversity and high-fibre intake are related to lower long-term weight gain. Int J Obes (Lond). 2017;41(7):1099–1105. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2017.66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Goodrich JK, Waters J, Poole A, Sutter J, Koren O, Blekhman R, Beaumont M, Van Treuren W, Knight R, Bell J. et al. Human genetics shape the gut microbiome. Cell. 2014;159(4):789–799. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Vojinovic D, Radjabzadeh D, Kurilshikov A, Amin N, Wijmenga C, Franke L, Ikram MA, Uitterlinden AG, Zhernakova A, Fu J. et al. Relationship between gut microbiota and circulating metabolites in population-based cohorts. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):5813. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13721-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tavella T, Rampelli S, Guidarelli G, Bazzocchi A, Gasperini C, Pujos-Guillot E, Comte B, Barone M, Biagi E, Candela M. et al. Elevated gut microbiome abundance of Christensenellaceae, Porphyromonadaceae and Rikenellaceae is associated with reduced visceral adipose tissue and healthier metabolic profile in Italian elderly. Gut Microbes. 2021;13(1):1–19. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1880221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Christensen L, Vuholm S, Roager HM, Nielsen DS, Krych L, Kristensen M, Astrup A, Hjorth MF. Prevotella Abundance Predicts Weight Loss Success in Healthy, Overweight Adults Consuming a Whole-Grain Diet Ad Libitum: A Post Hoc Analysis of a 6-Wk Randomized Controlled Trial. J Nutr. 2019;149(12):2174–2181. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxz198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Andoh A, Nishida A, Takahashi K, Inatomi O, Imaeda H, Bamba S, Kito K, Sugimoto M, Kobayashi T. Comparison of the gut microbial community between obese and lean peoples using 16S gene sequencing in a Japanese population. J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2016;59(1):65–70. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.15-152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Turnbaugh PJ, Hamady M, Yatsunenko T, Cantarel BL, Duncan A, Ley RE, Sogin ML, Jones WJ, Roe BA, Affourtit JP. et al. A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins. Nature. 2009;457(7228):480–484. doi: 10.1038/nature07540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Jie Z, Xia H, Zhong S-L, Feng Q, Li S, Liang S, Zhong H, Liu Z, Gao Y, Zhao H. et al. The gut microbiome in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):845. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00900-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Aron-Wisnewsky J, Clement K. The gut microbiome, diet, and links to cardiometabolic and chronic disorders. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2016;12(3):169–181. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2015.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hartstra AV, Bouter KE, Backhed F, Nieuwdorp M. Insights into the role of the microbiome in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(1):159–165. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Franceschi C, Garagnani P, Morsiani C, Conte M, Santoro A, Grignolio A, Monti D, Capri M, Salvioli S. The Continuum of Aging and Age-Related Diseases: Common Mechanisms but Different Rates. Front Med. 2018;5:61. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Fulop T, Larbi A, Witkowski JM, McElhaney J, Loeb M, Mitnitski A, Pawelec G. Aging, frailty and age-related diseases. Biogerontology. 2010;11(5):547–563. doi: 10.1007/s10522-010-9287-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Stampfer MJ. Cardiovascular disease and Alzheimer’s disease: common links. J Intern Med. 2006;260:211–223. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2006.01687.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Claesson MJ, Cusack S, O’Sullivan O, Greene-Diniz R, de Weerd H, Flannery E, Marchesi JR, Falush D, Dinan T, Fitzgerald G. et al. Composition, variability, and temporal stability of the intestinal microbiota of the elderly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108 Suppl 1(supplement_1):4586–4591. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000097107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Haran JP, McCormick BA. Aging, frailty, and the microbiome—how dysbiosis influences human aging and disease. Gastroenterology. 2021;160(2):507–523. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.09.060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wilmanski T, Diener C, Rappaport N, Patwardhan S, Wiedrick J, Lapidus J, Earls JC, Zimmer A, Glusman G, Robinson M. et al. Gut microbiome pattern reflects healthy ageing and predicts survival in humans. Nat Metab. 2021;3(2):274–286. doi: 10.1038/s42255-021-00348-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Ghosh TS, Das M, Jeffery IB, O’Toole PW. Adjusting for age improves identification of gut microbiome alterations in multiple diseases. Elife. 2020;9. doi: 10.7554/eLife.50240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ghosh TS, Shanahan F, O’Toole PW. The gut microbiome as a modulator of healthy ageing. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;19(9):565–584. doi: 10.1038/s41575-022-00605-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Biagi E, Franceschi C, Rampelli S, Severgnini M, Ostan R, Turroni S, Consolandi C, Quercia S, Scurti M, Monti D. et al. Gut Microbiota and Extreme Longevity. Curr Biol. 2016;26(11):1480–1485. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Claesson MJ, Jeffery IB, Conde S, Power SE, O’Connor EM, Cusack S, Harris HMB, Coakley M, Lakshminarayanan B, O’Sullivan O. et al. Gut microbiota composition correlates with diet and health in the elderly. Nature. 2012;488(7410):178–184. doi: 10.1038/nature11319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Park SH, Kim K-A, Ahn Y-T, Jeong J-J, Huh C-S, Kim D-H. Comparative analysis of gut microbiota in elderly people of urbanized towns and longevity villages. BMC Microbiol. 2015;15(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12866-015-0386-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Zhang X, Zhong H, Li Y, Shi Z, Ren H, Zhang Z, Zhou X, Tang S, Han X, Lin Y. et al. Sex-and age-related trajectories of the adult human gut microbiota shared across populations of different ethnicities. Nat Aging. 2021;1(1):87–100. doi: 10.1038/s43587-020-00014-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Rahayu ES, Utami T, Mariyatun M, Hasan PN, Kamil RZ, Setyawan RH, Pamungkaningtyas FH, Harahap IA, Wiryohanjoyo DV, Pramesi PC. et al. Gut microbiota profile in healthy Indonesians. WJG. 2019;25(12):1478. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i12.1478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Tuikhar N, Keisam S, Labala R K I, Ramakrishnan P, Arunkumar MC, Ahmed G, Biagi E, Jeyaram K. Comparative analysis of the gut microbiota in centenarians and young adults shows a common signature across genotypically non-related populations. Mech Ageing Dev. 2019;179:23–35. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2019.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Xu Y, Wang Y, Li H, Dai Y, Chen D, Wang M, Jiang X, Huang Z, Yu H, Huang J. et al. Altered Fecal Microbiota Composition in Older Adults with Frailty. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:696186. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.696186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Ghosh TS, Shanahan F, O’Toole PW. Toward an improved definition of a healthy microbiome for healthy aging. Nat Aging. 2022;2(11):1054–1069. doi: 10.1038/s43587-022-00306-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Olendzki B, Bucci V, Cawley C, Maserati R, McManus M, Olednzki E, Madziar C, Chiang D, Ward DV, Pellish R. et al. Dietary manipulation of the gut microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease patients: Pilot study. Gut Microbes. 2022;14(1):2046244. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2046244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Lambert SD, Bowe SJ, Livingston PM, Heckel L, Cook S, Kowal P, Orellana L. Impact of informal caregiving on older adults’ physical and mental health in low-income and middle-income countries: a cross-sectional, secondary analysis based on the WHO’s Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE). BMJ Open. 2017;7(11):e017236. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Feng Z, Zhan HJ, Feng X, Liu C, Sun M, Mor V. An industry in the making: the emergence of institutional elder care in urban china. J American Geriatrics Society. 2011;59(4):738–744. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03330.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Eskildsen M, Price T. Nursing home care in the USA. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2009;9(1):1–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2008.00513.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Kemper P, Murtaugh CM. Lifetime Use of Nursing Home Care. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(9):595–600. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199102283240905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Chyr LC, Drabo EF, Fabius CD, Meeks S. Patterns and Predictors of Transitions Across Residential Care Settings and Nursing Homes Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in the United States. Gerontologist. 2020;60(8):1495–1503. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Haran JP, Zeamer A, Ward DV, Dutta P, Bucci V, McCormick BA. The Nursing Home Older Adult Gut Microbiome Composition Shows Time-dependent Dysbiosis and Is Influenced by Medication Exposures, Age, Environment, and Frailty. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2021;76(11):1930–1938. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glab167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Jump RLP, Crnich CJ, Mody L, Bradley SF, Nicolle LE, Yoshikawa TT. Infectious Diseases in Older Adults of Long-Term Care Facilities: Update on Approach to Diagnosis and Management. J American Geriatrics Society. 2018;66(4):789–803. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Dethlefsen L, Relman DA. Incomplete recovery and individualized responses of the human distal gut microbiota to repeated antibiotic perturbation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108 Suppl 1(supplement_1):4554–4561. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000087107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Ubeda C, Taur Y, Jenq RR, Equinda MJ, Son T, Samstein M, Viale A, Socci ND, van den Brink MRM, Kamboj M. et al. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus domination of intestinal microbiota is enabled by antibiotic treatment in mice and precedes bloodstream invasion in humans. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(12):4332–4341. doi: 10.1172/JCI43918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Larson PJ, Zhou W, Santiago A, Driscoll S, Fleming E, Voigt AY, Chun OK, Grady JJ, Kuchel GA, Robison JT. et al. Associations of the skin, oral and gut microbiome with aging, frailty and infection risk reservoirs in older adults. Nat Aging. 2022;2(10):941–955. doi: 10.1038/s43587-022-00287-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Sehgal K, Khanna S. Gut microbiome and Clostridioides difficile infection: a closer look at the microscopic interface. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021;14:1756284821994736. doi: 10.1177/1756284821994736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Vakili B, Fateh A, Asadzadeh Aghdaei H, Sotoodehnejadnematalahi F, Siadat SD. Intestinal Microbiota in Elderly Inpatients with Clostridioides difficile Infection. IDR. 2020;13:2723–2731. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S262019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Haran JP, Ward DV, Bhattarai SK, Loew E, Dutta P, Higgins A, McCormick BA, Bucci V. The high prevalence of Clostridioides difficile among nursing home elders associates with a dysbiotic microbiome. Gut Microbes. 2021;13(1):1–15. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1897209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Bian G, Gloor GB, Gong A, Jia C, Zhang W, Hu J, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Zhou Z, Zhang J. et al. The Gut Microbiota of Healthy Aged Chinese Is Similar to That of the Healthy Young. mSphere. 2017;2(5). doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00327-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Kong F, Hua Y, Zeng B, Ning R, Li Y, Zhao J. Gut microbiota signatures of longevity. Curr Biol. 2016;26(18):R832–r833. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Wang F, Yu T, Huang G, Cai D, Liang X, Su H, Zhu Z, Li D, Yang Y, Shen P. et al. Gut Microbiota Community and Its Assembly Associated with Age and Diet in Chinese Centenarians. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;25(8):1195–1204. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1410.10014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Collado MC, Derrien M, Isolauri E, de Vos WM, Salminen S. Intestinal integrity and Akkermansia muciniphila, a mucin-degrading member of the intestinal microbiota present in infants, adults, and the elderly. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73(23):7767–7770. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01477-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Haran JP, Bucci V, Dutta P, Ward D, McCormick B. The nursing home elder microbiome stability and associations with age, frailty, nutrition and physical location. J Med Microbiol. 2018;67(1):40–51. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Singh H, Torralba MG, Moncera KJ, DiLello L, Petrini J, Nelson KE, Pieper R. Gastro-intestinal and oral microbiome signatures associated with healthy aging. Geroscience. 2019;41(6):907–921. doi: 10.1007/s11357-019-00098-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.DeJong EN, Surette MG, Bowdish DME. The Gut Microbiota and Unhealthy Aging: Disentangling Cause from Consequence. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;28(2):180–189. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Holstege H, Beker N, Dijkstra T, Pieterse K, Wemmenhove E, Schouten K, Thiessens L, Horsten D, Rechtuijt S, Sikkes S. et al. The 100-plus Study of cognitively healthy centenarians: rationale, design and cohort description. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018;33(12):1229–1249. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0451-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Kulagina EV, Efimov BA, Maximov PY, Kafarskaia LI, Chaplin AV, Shkoporov AN. Species composition of Bacteroidales order bacteria in the feces of healthy people of various ages. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2012;76(1):169–171. doi: 10.1271/bbb.110434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Haran JP, Bhattarai SK, Foley SE, Dutta P, Ward DV, Bucci V, McCormick BA. et al. Alzheimer’s Disease Microbiome Is Associated with Dysregulation of the Anti-Inflammatory P-Glycoprotein Pathway. mBio. 2019;10(3). doi: 10.1128/mBio.00632-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Church S, Rogers E, Rockwood K, Theou O. A scoping review of the Clinical Frailty Scale. BMC Geriatr. 2020;20(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01801-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Dent E, Kowal P, Hoogendijk EO. Frailty measurement in research and clinical practice: a review. Eur J Intern Med. 2016;31:3–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Jackson MA, Jeffery IB, Beaumont M, Bell JT, Clark AG, Ley RE, O’Toole PW, Spector TD, Steves CJ. Signatures of early frailty in the gut microbiota. Genome Med. 2016;8(1). doi: 10.1186/s13073-016-0262-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Lim MY, Hong S, Kim J-H, Nam Y-D, Le Couteur D, Le Couteur D. Association between gut microbiome and frailty in the older adult population in Korea. J Gerontology: Series A. 2021;76(8):1362–1368. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaa319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Wang N, Li R, Lin H, Fu C, Wang X, Zhang Y, Su M, Huang P, Qian J, Jiang F. et al. Enriched taxa were found among the gut microbiota of centenarians in East China. PLOS ONE. 2019;14(10):e0222763. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Wu L, Zeng T, Zinellu A, Rubino S, Kelvin DJ, Carru C. A Cross-Sectional Study of Compositional and Functional Profiles of Gut Microbiota in Sardinian Centenarians. mSystems. 2019;4(4):1 0.1128/msystems.00325–00319. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00325-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Nagao-Kitamoto H, Kamada N. Host-microbial Cross-talk in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Immune Netw. 2017;17(1):1–12. doi: 10.4110/in.2017.17.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Verdi S, Jackson MA, Beaumont M, Bowyer RCE, Bell JT, Spector TD, Steves CJ. An Investigation into Physical Frailty as a Link Between the Gut Microbiome and Cognitive Health. Front Aging Neurosci. 2018;10:398. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Libby P. Inflammation and cardiovascular disease mechanisms. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83(2):456S–460S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/83.2.456S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Esposito K, Giugliano D. The metabolic syndrome and inflammation: association or causation? Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2004;14(5):228–232. doi: 10.1016/S0939-4753(04)80048-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Akchurin OM, Kaskel F. Update on inflammation in chronic kidney disease. Blood Purif. 2015;39(1–3):84–92. doi: 10.1159/000368940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Wang T. Searching for the link between inflammaging and sarcopenia. Ageing Res Rev. 2022;77:101611. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2022.101611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Biagi E, Nylund L, Candela M, Ostan R, Bucci L, Pini E, Nikkïla J, Monti D, Satokari R, Franceschi C. et al. Through ageing, and beyond: gut microbiota and inflammatory status in seniors and centenarians. PLoS One. 2010;5(5):e10667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Frank DN, St. Amand AL, Feldman RA, Boedeker EC, Harpaz N, Pace NR. Molecular-phylogenetic characterization of microbial community imbalances in human inflammatory bowel diseases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007;104:13780–13785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Gruenheid S, Le Moual H. Resistance to antimicrobial peptides in Gram-negative bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2012;330(2):81–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2012.02528.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Belkaid Y, Hand TW. Role of the microbiota in immunity and inflammation. Cell. 2014;157(1):121–141. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Sokol H, Pigneur B, Watterlot L, Lakhdari O, Bermúdez-Humarán LG, Gratadoux JJ, Blugeon S, Bridonneau C, Furet JP, Corthier G, et al. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is an anti-inflammatory commensal bacterium identified by gut microbiota analysis of Crohn disease patients. 2008; 105:16731–16736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Ueda A, Shinkai S, Shiroma H, Taniguchi Y, Tsuchida S, Kariya T, Kawahara T, Kobayashi Y, Kohda N, Ushida K. et al. Identification of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii strains for gut microbiome-based intervention in Alzheimer’s-type dementia. Cell Rep Med. 2021;2(9):100398. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Gong J, Liu S, Wang S, Ruan H, Mou Q, Fan P, Chen T, Cai W, Lu Y, Lu Z. et al. Identification of fecal microbiome signatures associated with familial longevity and candidate metabolites for healthy aging. Aging Cell. 2023;22(6):e13848. doi: 10.1111/acel.13848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Szabady RL, Louissaint C, Lubben A, Xie B, Reeksting S, Tuohy C, Demma Z, Foley SE, Faherty CS, Llanos-Chea A. et al. Intestinal P-glycoprotein exports endocannabinoids to prevent inflammation and maintain homeostasis. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(9):4044–4056. doi: 10.1172/JCI96817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Bischoff SC, Barbara G, Buurman W, Ockhuizen T, Schulzke J-D, Serino M, Tilg H, Watson A, Wells JM. Intestinal permeability – a new target for disease prevention and therapy. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014;14(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12876-014-0189-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Stadlbauer V, Engertsberger L, Komarova I, Feldbacher N, Leber B, Pichler G, Fink N, Scarpatetti M, Schippinger W, Schmidt R. et al. Dysbiosis, gut barrier dysfunction and inflammation in dementia: a pilot study. BMC Geriatr. 2020;20(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01644-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Rashidah NH, Lim SM, Neoh CF, Majeed ABA, Tan MP, Khor HM, Tan AH, Rehiman SH, Ramasamy K. Differential gut microbiota and intestinal permeability between frail and healthy older adults: A systematic review. Ageing Res Rev. 2022;82:101744. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2022.101744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Clausen MR, Mortensen P. Kinetic studies on colonocyte metabolism of short chain fatty acids and glucose in ulcerative colitis. Gut. 1995;37(5):684–689. doi: 10.1136/gut.37.5.684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Peng L, Li ZR, Green RS, Holzman IR, Lin J. Butyrate enhances the intestinal barrier by facilitating tight junction assembly via activation of AMP-activated protein kinase in Caco-2 cell monolayers. J Nutr. 2009;139(9):1619–1625. doi: 10.3945/jn.109.104638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Nikolich-Zugich J. The twilight of immunity: emerging concepts in aging of the immune system. Nat Immunol. 2018;19(1):10–19. doi: 10.1038/s41590-017-0006-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Shen X, Miao J, Wan Q, Wang S, Li M, Pu F, Wang G, Qian W, Yu Q, Marotta F. et al. Possible correlation between gut microbiota and immunity among healthy middle-aged and elderly people in southwest China. Gut Pathog. 2018;10(1). doi: 10.1186/s13099-018-0231-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Amedei A, Morbidelli L. Circulating Metabolites Originating from Gut Microbiota Control Endothelial Cell Function. Molecules. 2019;24(21):3992. doi: 10.3390/molecules24213992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Rampelli S, Candela M, Turroni S, Biagi E, Collino S, Franceschi C, O’Toole PW, Brigidi P. Functional metagenomic profiling of intestinal microbiome in extreme ageing. Aging. 2013;5(12):902–912. doi: 10.18632/aging.100623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Nicholson JK, Holmes E, Kinross J, Burcelin R, Gibson G, Jia W, Pettersson S. Host-Gut Microbiota Metabolic Interactions. Science. 2012;336(6086):1262–1267. doi: 10.1126/science.1223813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Menni C, Zhu J, Le Roy CI, Mompeo O, Young K, Rebholz CM, Selvin E, North KE, Mohney RP, Bell JT. et al. Serum metabolites reflecting gut microbiome alpha diversity predict type 2 diabetes. Gut Microbes. 2020;11(6):1632–1642. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1778261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Chang PV, Hao L, Offermanns S, Medzhitov R. The microbial metabolite butyrate regulates intestinal macrophage function via histone deacetylase inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(6):2247–2252. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1322269111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Macfarlane GT, Macfarlane S. Bacteria, colonic fermentation, and gastrointestinal health. J AOAC Int. 2012;95(1):50–60. doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.SGE_Macfarlane. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Ghosh TS, Rampelli S, Jeffery IB, Santoro A, Neto M, Capri M, Giampieri E, Jennings A, Candela M, Turroni S. et al. Mediterranean diet intervention alters the gut microbiome in older people reducing frailty and improving health status: the NU-AGE 1-year dietary intervention across five European countries. Gut. 2020;69(7):1218–1228. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Yan H, Qin Q, Yan S, Chen J, Yang Y, Li T, Gao X, Ding S. Comparison of the Gut Microbiota in Different Age Groups in China. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:877914. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.877914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Mithul Aravind S, Wichienchot S, Tsao R, Ramakrishnan S, Chakkaravarthi S. Role of dietary polyphenols on gut microbiota, their metabolites and health benefits. Food Res Int. 2021;142:110189. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Koeth RA, Wang Z, Levison BS, Buffa JA, Org E, Sheehy BT, Britt EB, Fu X, Wu Y, Li L. et al. Intestinal microbiota metabolism of L-carnitine, a nutrient in red meat, promotes atherosclerosis. Nat Med. 2013;19(5):576–585. doi: 10.1038/nm.3145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Rath S, Rox K, Kleine Bardenhorst S, Schminke U, Dörr M, Mayerle J, Frost F, Lerch MM, Karch A, Brönstrup M. et al. Higher Trimethylamine-N-Oxide plasma levels with increasing age are mediated by diet and trimethylamine-forming bacteria. mSystems. 2021;6(5):1 0.1128/msystems.00945–00921. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00945-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Brunt VE, LaRocca TJ, Bazzoni AE, Sapinsley ZJ, Miyamoto-Ditmon J, Gioscia-Ryan RA, Neilson AP, Link CD, Seals DR. The gut microbiome–derived metabolite trimethylamine N-oxide modulates neuroinflammation and cognitive function with aging. Geroscience. 2021;43(1):377–394. doi: 10.1007/s11357-020-00257-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Smyth EM. Thromboxane and the thromboxane receptor in cardiovascular disease. Clin Lipidol. 2010;5(2):209–219. doi: 10.2217/clp.10.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Rampelli S, Soverini M, D’Amico F, Barone M, Tavella T, Monti D, Capri M, Astolfi A, Brigidi P, Biagi E. et al. Shotgun Metagenomics of Gut Microbiota in Humans with up to Extreme Longevity and the Increasing Role of Xenobiotic Degradation. mSystems. 2020;5(2). doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00124-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Pascal Andreu V, Augustijn HE, Chen L, Zhernakova A, Fu J, Fischbach MA, Dodd D, Medema MH. gutSMASH predicts specialized primary metabolic pathways from the human gut microbiota. Nat Biotechnol. 2023;41(10):1416–1423. doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-01675-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Ruiz-Ruiz S, Sanchez‐Carrillo S, Ciordia S, Mena MC, Méndez‐García C, Rojo D, Bargiela R, Zubeldia‐Varela E, Martínez‐Martínez M, Barbas C. et al. Functional microbiome deficits associated with ageing: Chronological age threshold. Aging Cell. 2020;19(1):e13063. doi: 10.1111/acel.13063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Cerdó T, Diéguez E, Campoy C. Impact of gut microbiota on neurogenesis and neurological diseases during infancy. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2020;50:33–37. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2019.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Liu S, Gao J, Liu K, Zhang HL. Microbiota-gut-brain axis and Alzheimer’s disease: Implications of the blood-brain barrier as an intervention target. Mech Ageing Dev. 2021;199:111560. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2021.111560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Ntranos A, Casaccia P. The Microbiome–Gut–Behavior Axis: Crosstalk Between the Gut Microbiome and Oligodendrocytes Modulates Behavioral Responses. Neurotherapeutics. 2018;15(1):31–35. doi: 10.1007/s13311-017-0597-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Jiang C, Li G, Huang P, Liu Z, Zhao B. The Gut Microbiota and Alzheimer’s Disease. J Alzheimer’s dis : JAD. 2017;58(1):1–15. doi: 10.3233/JAD-161141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Seo DO, Boros BD, Holtzman DM. The microbiome: A target for Alzheimer disease? Cell Res. 2019;29(10):779–780. doi: 10.1038/s41422-019-0227-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Cryan JF, O’Riordan KJ, Cowan CSM, Sandhu KV, Bastiaanssen TFS, Boehme M, Codagnone MG, Cussotto S, Fulling C, Golubeva AV. et al. The Microbiota-gut-brain axis. Physiol Rev. 2019;99(4):1877–2013. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00018.2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Gut instincts: microbiota as a key regulator of brain development, ageing and neurodegeneration. Journal Of Physiology. 2017;595(2):489–503. doi: 10.1113/JP273106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Li F, Hearn M, Bennett LE. The role of microbial infection in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease and the opportunity for protection by anti-microbial peptides. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2021;47(2):240–253. doi: 10.1080/1040841X.2021.1876630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Itzhaki RF, Lathe R, Balin BJ, Ball MJ, Bearer EL, Braak H, Bullido MJ, Carter C, Clerici M, Cosby SL. et al. Microbes and Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimer’s dis : JAD. 2016;51(4):979–984. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Maheshwari P, Eslick GD. Bacterial infection and Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis. J Alzheimer’s dis : JAD. 2015;43:957–966. doi: 10.3233/JAD-140621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Ekundayo TC, Olasehinde TA, Okaiyeto K, Okoh AI. Microbial pathogenesis and pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic assessment of microorganisms’ implications in the Neurodegenerative disease. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:648484. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.648484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Marizzoni M, Cattaneo A, Mirabelli P, Festari C, Lopizzo N, Nicolosi V, Mombelli E, Mazzelli M, Luongo D, Naviglio D. et al. Short-chain fatty acids and lipopolysaccharide as mediators between gut dysbiosis and amyloid pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimer’s dis : JAD. 2020;78(2):683–697. doi: 10.3233/JAD-200306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.MahmoudianDehkordi S, Arnold M, Nho K, Ahmad S, Jia W, Xie G, Louie G, Kueider‐Paisley A, Moseley MA, Thompson JW. et al. “Altered bile acid profile associates with cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease—an emerging role for gut microbiome.” Alzheimer’s & Dementia. 2019;15(1):76–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.07.217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Kang JW, Zivkovic AM. The potential utility of prebiotics to modulate Alzheimer’s disease: a review of the evidence. Microorganisms. 2021;9(11):2310. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9112310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Baloni P, Funk CC, Yan J, Yurkovich JT, Kueider-Paisley A, Nho K, Heinken A, Jia W, Mahmoudiandehkordi S, Louie G. et al. Metabolic network analysis reveals altered bile acid synthesis and metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Rep Med. 2020;1(8):100138. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2020.100138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Marseglia A, Xu W, Fratiglioni L, Fabbri C, Berendsen AAM, Bialecka-Debek A, Jennings A, Gillings R, Meunier N, Caumon E. et al. Effect of the NU-AGE diet on cognitive functioning in older adults: a randomized Controlled Trial. Front Physiol. 2018;9:349. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Jayanama K, Theou O. Effects of probiotics and prebiotics on frailty and ageing: a narrative review. Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2020;15(3):183–192. doi: 10.2174/1574884714666191120124548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Kruger JF, Hillesheim E, Pereira A, Camargo CQ, Rabito EI. Probiotics for dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutr Rev. 2021;79(2):160–170. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuaa037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Donati Zeppa S, Agostini D, Ferrini F, Gervasi M, Barbieri E, Bartolacci A, Piccoli G, Saltarelli R, Sestili P, Stocchi V. et al. Interventions on gut microbiota for healthy aging. Cells. 2022;12(1):34. doi: 10.3390/cells12010034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Benjamin S. Preventing Alzheimer’s disease and cognitive decline. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2010;193:1–727. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Ni Lochlainn M, Cox NJ, Wilson T, Hayhoe RPG, Ramsay SE, Granic A, Isanejad M, Roberts HC, Wilson D, Welch C. et al. Nutrition and frailty: Opportunities for prevention and treatment. Nutrients. 2021;13(7):2349. doi: 10.3390/nu13072349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Zmora N, Zilberman-Schapira G, Suez J, Mor U, Dori-Bachash M, Bashiardes S, Kotler E, Zur M, Regev-Lehavi D, Brik RBZ. et al. Personalized gut mucosal colonization resistance to empiric probiotics is associated with unique host and microbiome features. Cell. 2018;174(6):1388–1405 e1321. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Wu L, Xie X, Liang T, Ma J, Yang L, Yang J, Li L, Xi Y, Li H, Zhang J. et al. Integrated multi-omics for novel aging biomarkers and antiaging targets. Biomolecules. 2021;12(1):39. doi: 10.3390/biom12010039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Srivastava P, Tiwari A, Ahmad K, Srivastava N, Garg P. Editorial: An insight into multi-omics analysis of dementia disorders. Front Genet. 2023;14:1206530. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1206530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Nie C, Li Y, Li R, Yan Y, Zhang D, Li T, Li Z, Sun Y, Zhen H, Ding J. et al. Distinct biological ages of organs and systems identified from a multi-omics study. Cell Rep. 2022;38(10):110459. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Ngandu T, Lehtisalo J, Solomon A, Levälahti E, Ahtiluoto S, Antikainen R, Bäckman L, Hänninen T, Jula A, Laatikainen T. et al. A 2 year multidomain intervention of diet, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk monitoring versus control to prevent cognitive decline in at-risk elderly people (FINGER): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9984):2255–2263. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60461-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Dedeyne L, Deschodt M, Verschueren S, Tournoy J, Gielen E. Effects of multi-domain interventions in (pre)frail elderly on frailty, functional, and cognitive status: a systematic review. Clin Interv Aging. 2017;12:873–896. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S130794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Sachdeva S, James J, Taylor S, Lioi A, Petschek I, Darling S, Najm I, Punia V. Multidisciplinary lifestyle interventions for neurological disorders during the silent phase (minds) study: an exploratory, multiomics randomized controlled trial (P5-4.010). Neurology. 2024;102(17_supplement_1):5807. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000206048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
