Skip to main content
. 1999 Mar 20;318(7186):779–783. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7186.779

Table 1.

Examples of current quality improvement activities in primary care in relation to the principles of clinical governance6

Examples of current activities/organisations involved Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities in governance
Quality improvement processes are in place and integrated
Clinical audit led by primary care audit groups (or equivalents) High levels of participation by practices14 Quality of some audits could be improved Integrate with evidence based practice and continuing professional development
Can lead to demonstrable improvements in care Audits often not linked to evidence14 or to continuing professional development Use of a wider range of implementation methods3
PCG-wide policy for clinical data recording
Evidence based practice, innovative practice, and research and development
Clinical effectiveness not actively managed16 Increasing examples of evidence based health care through guidelines17 and/or audit protocols18 Lack of local support and infrastructure Systematise and actively manage evidence based practice in primary care groups
Research practice networks and individual research practices; university departments Lack of training and skills in evidence based practice Research practices/research groups
Professional development programmes
Hospital based teaching, pharmaceutical companies Self directed learning groups Not actively managed or systematic Multidisciplinary practice professional development plan20
Departments of general practice/nursing, etc Vocational training and trainers19 Failure of traditional continuing medical education to change practice5 Needs based or practice based life long learning
Practice based educational programmes Clinical supervision (nursing) Not needs based learning
Systems for recertification being developed Not multidisciplinary
Complaints, adverse events, and clinical risk reduction
Practice based complaints procedure Resolution of complaints locally Not actively managed or systematic Integrate with other quality improvement processes, collation of data at primary care group level
Poor clinical performance
No requirement routinely to monitor clinical performance Clinical supervision (nursing) Often not actively managed or systematic Actively manage a process to identify, support, and rectify poor performance at individual and team levels.
GMC/UKCC procedures; health authority procedures Tool available to monitor and enhance performance21 Current procedures rely on extreme cases Develop occupational health22

GMC=General Medical Council; UKCC=United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery, and Health Visiting; PCG=primary care group