Table 1.
Examples of current activities/organisations involved | Strengths | Weaknesses | Opportunities in governance |
---|---|---|---|
Quality improvement processes are in place and integrated | |||
Clinical audit led by primary care audit groups (or equivalents) | High levels of participation by practices14 | Quality of some audits could be improved | Integrate with evidence based practice and continuing professional development |
Can lead to demonstrable improvements in care | Audits often not linked to evidence14 or to continuing professional development | Use of a wider range of implementation methods3 | |
PCG-wide policy for clinical data recording | |||
Evidence based practice, innovative practice, and research and development | |||
Clinical effectiveness not actively managed16 | Increasing examples of evidence based health care through guidelines17 and/or audit protocols18 | Lack of local support and infrastructure | Systematise and actively manage evidence based practice in primary care groups |
Research practice networks and individual research practices; university departments | Lack of training and skills in evidence based practice | Research practices/research groups | |
Professional development programmes | |||
Hospital based teaching, pharmaceutical companies | Self directed learning groups | Not actively managed or systematic | Multidisciplinary practice professional development plan20 |
Departments of general practice/nursing, etc | Vocational training and trainers19 | Failure of traditional continuing medical education to change practice5 | Needs based or practice based life long learning |
Practice based educational programmes | Clinical supervision (nursing) | Not needs based learning | |
Systems for recertification being developed | Not multidisciplinary | ||
Complaints, adverse events, and clinical risk reduction | |||
Practice based complaints procedure | Resolution of complaints locally | Not actively managed or systematic | Integrate with other quality improvement processes, collation of data at primary care group level |
Poor clinical performance | |||
No requirement routinely to monitor clinical performance | Clinical supervision (nursing) | Often not actively managed or systematic | Actively manage a process to identify, support, and rectify poor performance at individual and team levels. |
GMC/UKCC procedures; health authority procedures | Tool available to monitor and enhance performance21 | Current procedures rely on extreme cases | Develop occupational health22 |
GMC=General Medical Council; UKCC=United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery, and Health Visiting; PCG=primary care group