Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jun 5.
Published in final edited form as: Stud Fam Plann. 2023 Feb 14;54(1):119–143. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12229

TABLE 1.

Variable names and item wording for Quality of Contraceptive Counseling (QCC-10) scale items by domain

Variable name Item wording
Information exchange (five items)
 personal The provider asked me questions to provide counseling that fit me personally
 info I received all the information I wanted to know about my options for contraception
 body_react I understand how my body might react to using contraception
 explain I understand how to use method(s) we talked about during the consultation
 opinion I was able to give my opinion about what I needed
Interpersonal relations (three items)
 express_self I felt encouraged to ask questions and express my concerns
 no_interrupt Provider tried to ensure there were no interruptions during our session
 enough_time The provider gave me the time to consider the contraceptive options
Disrespect and abuse (two items)
 prov_insist I felt pressured by the provider to use the method they wanted me to usea
 scold_marital I felt scolded because of my marital statusa

RESPONSE OPTIONS: “Completely agree” (coded as 4); “agree” (coded as 3); “disagree” (coded as 2); “completely disagree” (coded as 1). Response options for the two disrespect and abuse items and exact item wording for several items varied slightly from the original QCC-10 paper (Holt et al., 2022), given adjustments made by the Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA) research teams to accommodate in-country preferences.

a

Items reverse scored with “completely agree” coded as 1 and “completely disagree” coded as 4; higher scores indicated higher quality counseling.