. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jun 5.

Published in final edited form as: Stud Fam Plann. 2023 Feb 14;54(1):119–143. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12229

TABLE 4.

Convergent validity by geography: Frequency, percent, and odds of reporting highest satisfaction rating for family planning visit, predicted by Quality of Contraceptive Counseling (QCC-10) scale, by geography

	Burkina Faso (n = 960)			Kenya (n = 4,841)			Kano, Nigeria^a (n = 746)			Lagos, Nigeria^a (n = 558)
	n (%)	OR (p-value)	aOR (95% CI)	n (%)	OR (p-value)	aOR (95% CI)	n (%)	OR (p-value)	aOR (95% CI)	n (%)	OR (p-value)	aOR (95% CI)
Highest satisfaction rating for initial family planning visit	385 (40.1)	6.37 (p < 0.001)	7.47^*** (5.10–11.0)	2,334 (48.2)	21.14 (p < 0.001)	21.20^*** (13.62–32.99)	520 (69.6)	7.44 (p < 0.001)	8.00^*** (3.06–20.89)	384 (68.6)	3.52 (p < o.ooi)	3.51^*** (1.90–6.45)

NOTE: OR = odds ratio; aOR = adjusted odds ratio, adjusted for age, parity, marital status (^aexcept in Nigeria where nearly all women were in-union), and education. Robust confidence interval in parentheses, adjusting for clustering of women within facilities.

^***

p < 0.01,

^**

p < 0.05,

p < 0.1.

Key predictor: QCC-10 scale score.