Table 5.

Comparison of the proposed method with state-of-the-art methods in two crops (orange and eucalyptus).

Crop	Methods	Precision (%)	Recall (%)	F1(%)
Orange	Deep Hough Transform [44]	96.0 (±6.5)	91.8 (±10.7)	93.2 (±9.1)
	PPGNet [45]	95.0 (±7.1)	91.2 (±9.4)	92.7 (±8.2)
	Proposed Method	98.9 (±2.0)	93.8 (±6.6)	95.9 (±4.3)
Euca- lyptus	Deep Hough Transform [44]	98.4 (±2.6)	90.6 (±8.9)	93.8 (±6.3)
	PPGNet [45]	84.6 (±10.1)	81.0 (±11.2)	82.3 (±9.9)
	Proposed Method	98.9 (±1.4)	94.4 (±5.4)	96.4 (±3.2)