Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 24;86(6):3416–3422. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002039

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies.

Characteristic Ventura-Cots et al.9 Fagan et al.10 Sharma et al.8 Simon-Talero et al.7
Author and YOP 2021 2023 2017 2013
Country Switzerland Virginia India Spain
Sample size 82 48 120 56
Intervention Albumin (n=40) Albumin (n=24) Lactulose + (n=60) Albumin (n=26)
Control Isotonic saline (n=42) Isotonic saline (n=24) Lactulose (n=60) Isotonic saline (n=30)
Age (median/mean/frequency)a 66.5 (59.9–73.6) vs. 69.1 (63.3–75.3) 62.21±8.59 vs. 63.83±6.99 42.5±8.7 vs. 38.4±9.6 63.7±11.3 vs. 66.3±9.7
Male sex, n (%) 55 (67) 43 (89.5) 100 (83.3) 42 (75)
Aetiology, n (%)
 Viral hepatitis 11 (13.4) 7 (14.5) 36 (30) 19 (33.9)
 Alcohol 41 (50) 22 (45.8) 67 (55.8) 24 (42.9)
 Other 12 (14.6) 2 (4.2) 17 (14.2) 13 (23.2)
 MELD scorea 17 (15–20) vs. 17 (16–20) 11.75±3.78 vs. 10.46±3.36 26.4±5.8 vs. 25.8±5.1 16.8±3.8 vs. 16.1±5.1
 Duration of treatment 3 days 5 weeks 10 days 3 days
Severity of HE; n (%)a
 Grade II–III 40 (100) vs. 41 (97.6) -b 41 (68.3) vs. 43 (71.6) 22 (84.6) vs. 24 (80)
 Grade IV 0 vs. 1 (2.4) -b 19 (31.7) vs. 17 (28.4) 4 (15.4) vs. 6 (20)

HE, hepatic encephalopathy; MELD, model for end-stage liver disease; MHE, minimal hepatic encephalopathy; YOP, year of publication.

a

Intervention group compared to the control group, non-significant.

b

All patients had MHE (Grade 0).