Editor—Hossain et al conclude that vitamin A along with standard antibiotic reduces the severity of acute shigellosis and that vitamin A supplementation should be added to the standard treatment for acute shigellosis.1 We disagree with those conclusions.
The benefit of vitamin A as adjuvant treatment for shigellosis can be judged only in a study in which patients receive adequate antimicrobial treatment.2 In Hossain et al’s study 64% of patients were infected with strains of shigella resistant to nalidixic acid, which was used to treat study patients. It is unclear how many patients were given an alternative effective antibiotic or when treatment was changed.
The inadequacy of antimicrobial treatment in this study is reflected in clinical cure rates of less than 50% in patients who did and did not receive vitamin A supplements. That is not acceptable as adequate antimicrobial treatment routinely achieves a cure rate of 65% or more. 3 4 Indeed, Hossain and colleagues calculated their sample size based on a 98% cure rate in the vitamin A group.1
Their definition of cure included the absence of mucus or blood in stools. These measures are not good indicators of overall clinical status and are subject to variation between observers. It is important to know which component of the definition of clinical cure (three or fewer formed stools, no visible stool blood or mucus, afebrile) used in the study accounted for the difference in cure rates between groups and if there were any differences in more objective outcome measures, such as total number of stools during the study or duration of fever. 3 5
The authors contend that the differences in reported outcome between groups may have been because vitamin A supplementation stimulated phagocytosis and cell mediated killing of pathogens. The similar rate of clearance of shigella observed in the two groups seems to contradict this contention. The rapid divergence (by 24 hours) between groups in the proportion of patients with clinical cure suggests a more rapid response than could reasonably be expected to be achieved by vitamin A “enhanced repair of the micro-ulcers in the gut epithelium.”
Vitamin A has an important role in public health in developing countries. The rationale for its use, however, must come from well conducted studies in which children receive effective primary treatment for their illness (in this case effective antibiotics), and for which there are clear, reproducible, and clinically relevant definitions of treatment outcome.
References
- 1.Hossain S, Biswas R, Kabir I, Sarker S, Dibley M, Fuchs G, et al. Single-dose vitamin A treatment in acute shigellosis in Bangladeshi children: randomised double blind controlled trial. BMJ. 1998;316:422–426. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7129.422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Salam MA, Bennish ML. Antimicrobial therapy of shigellosis. Rev Infect Dis. 1991;13(suppl 4):S332–S341. doi: 10.1093/clinids/13.supplement_4.s332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Salam MA, Bennish ML. Therapy for shigellosis. I. Randomised, double blind trial of nalidixic acid in childhood shigellosis. J Pediatr. 1988;113:901–907. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(88)80029-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Salam MA, Dhar U, Khan WA, Bennish ML. Randomised comparison of ciprofloxacin suspension and pivmecillinam for childhood shigellosis. Lancet. 1998;352:522–527. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11457-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Salam MA, Seas C, Khan WA, Bennish ML. Treatment of shigellosis. IV. Cefixime ineffective in shigellosis in adults. Ann Intern Med. 1995;123:505–508. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-123-7-199510010-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]