Table 3.
Summary of quality standard–related issues in the reviews.
| Key themes | Quality issues | Reviews |
| Ethics | Guidelines needed, 10 issues—prudence, equity, privacy and intimacy, democratic participation, solidarity, responsibility, diversity inclusion, well-being, respect for autonomy, and sustainable development (Mörch et al [55]); the individual, organizational and society levels of the ethical framework by Asadi et al (Zhao et al [66]) | |
| Benefits, cost-effective, economic, external and clinical validation, and clinical utility | Need clinical validation and demonstration of economic benefits and clinical utility in real-world settings | |
| Benchmarks—models, data, and performance | Need standardized and comparable AIa models, parameters, evaluation measures, and gold standards | |
| Integration, federated learning, decision fusion, and ability to aggregate results | Need to integrate heterogeneous data from multiple sources and combine multiple classifier outputs into a common decision | |
| Privacy, security, open data, access, and protection | Need agreements and processes on privacy, security, access, open data, and data protection | |
| Education, web-based learning, learning experience, and competencies | Need education for the public, patients, students, and providers, including web-based learning and building competencies and as part of formal curricula | |
| Explainability | Enhance acceptability, understandability, and interpretability of solutions and ability to convey them to patients | |
| Reporting standards | Standardized reporting of study details to allow for comparison and replication | |
| Transparency | Need openness and being accountable through the entire AI life cycle | |
| Trust and trustworthiness | Need ethical guidelines to ensure confidence, truthfulness, and honesty with the design, use, and impact of AI systems | |
| Safety | Need to ensure patient safety from harm | |
| Bias—SDOHb and assessment | Need to consider sociodemographic variables and adequate sample sizes | |
| Co-design and engagement—user, provider, and public | Meaningful participation at all life cycle stages | |
| Technology maturity or feasibility, acceptance, and usability | Need user-friendly and mature AI systems with proven benefits to increase adoption | |
| Regulation and legal | Need legal framework and laws to ensure appropriate safe use and liability protection | |
| Context and time dependency | Purpose of AI models, health care context, and time lags have mediating effect | |
| Data integration and preprocessing | Need to integrate different variables and include multilevel data preprocessing to reduce dimensionality | |
| Design justice, equity, and fairness | Need design justice principles to engage the public and ensure a fair and equitable AI system | |
| Personalized care and targeted interventions | Select the best AI algorithms and outputs to customize care for specific individuals | |
| Quality—data and study | Need well-designed studies and quality data to conduct AI studies | |
| Social justice and social implications | Need to balance human caring needs with AI advances, understanding the societal impact of AI interventions |
|
| Governance | Need governance on the collection, storage, use, and transfer of data; being accountable and transparent with the process |
|
| Self-adaptability | Need adaptable and flexible AI systems that can improve over time |
|
aAI: artificial intelligence.
bSDOH: social determinants of health.