Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 21;13:210. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.145872.1

Table 3. Comparison of ultrasonographic features.

Benign (n=43) Non-benign (n=14) Total (n=57) P-value
Side, n (%) 0.701
Right 23 (53.5) 6 (42.9) 29 (50.9)
Left 20 (46.5) 8 (57.1) 28 (49.1)
Size, n (%) (#) 0.038 *
<5 cm 30 (70) 6 (43) 36 (63)
5-10 cm 9 (21) 1 (7) 10 (18)
>10 cm 4 (9) 7 (50) 11 (19)
Shape 0.28
Irregular 25 (58.1) 11 (78.6) 36 (63.2)
Oval 15 (34.9) 2 (14.3) 17 (29.8)
Round 3 (7) 1 (7.1) 4 (7)
Border, n (%) 0.19
Circumscribed 32 (74.4) 7 (50) 39 (68.4)
Not circumscribed
 Indistinct 3 (7) 3 (21.4) 6 (10.5)
 Angular 1 (2.3) 0 (0) 1 (1.8)
 Microlobulated 7 (16.3) 4 (28.6) 11 (19.3)
 Spiculated 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Echogenicity, n (%) 0.019 *
Hypoechogenicity 34 (79.1) 6 (42.9) 40 (70.2)
Hyperechogenicity 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Isoechogenicity 1 (2.3) 0 (0) 1 (1.8)
Heterogeneous echo 8 (18.6) 8 (57.1) 16 (28.1)
Posterior acoustic features, n (%) 0.524
Shadowing 1 (2.3) 0 (0) 1 (1.8)
Enhancement 14 (32.6) 8 (57.1) 22 (38.6)
Mixed feature 2 (4.7) 2 (14.3) 4 (7.0)
None 19 (44.2) 4 (28.6) 23 (40.4)
Cystic area, n (%) 1
Present 29 (67.4) 9 (64.3) 38 (66.7)
Absent 14 (32.6) 5 (35.7) 19 (33.3)
Vascularity, n (%) 0.04 *
Absent 4 (9.3) 3 (21.4) 7 (12.3)
Internal vascularity 37 (86) 8 (57.1) 45 (78.9)
Vessels in rim 2 (4.7) 3 (21.4) 5 (8.8)
*

Statistically significant at p value < 0.05 determined by Fisher’s exact test.