Skip to main content
. 2024 May 27;46:101985. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2024.101985

Table 3.

The predictive performance comparison between multi-omics signatures, clinical TNM staging and RADL signature for pCR.

Parameters Difference of AUC 95 % CI Z statistic P value
Multi-omics vs. clinical TNM staging system
Train 0.361 0.215 - 0.508 4.834 < 0.0001
Test 0.309 0.0909 - 0.528 2.776 0.0055
External validation 0.360 0.0514 - 0.396 2.544 0.0110
Multi-omics vs. RADL signature
Train 0.0843 0.0312 - 0.138 3.109 0.0019
Test 0.0238 −0.0591 - 0.107 0.563 0.5735
External validation 0.132 0.0590 - 0.205 3.547 0.0004