Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 6;22(6):e8814. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8814

Reference

Study name

Country

Study design

Follow‐up

Funding

Original cohort (N total)

Exclusion criteria

Study population

Ascertainment of outcome

Exposure groups

n/person‐years

Exposure assessment method

Incident cases Model covariates Results

Michikawa et al. (2019)

The Japan Environment and Children's Study

Japan

PC

Follow‐up from first trimester to birth

Funding: public

N  = 103,099 pregnancies

Population sampled: General population of pregnant women

Exclusion criteria: residing outside of study areas, restricting to first pregnancy per woman, and excluding twins and triplets, miscarriages and stillbirths, did not respond to FFQ in first trimester, reported extreme energy intake (lower and upper percentile), and missing information of maternal age at delivery

% lost to follow up: NR

n  = 89,658

Age at delivery, mean (SD): 31.2 (5.0)

Infant sex (% females): 48.7

Outcome

Identification of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) cases was made from medical records (ICD‐10 code Q79.0)

CDH reported either at delivery or at the end of the first month

Total vitamin A (retinol + provitamin A carotenoids – from diet only)

Median (IQR), μg RAE/day:

Q1 (ref): 230 (185, 264)

Q2: 346 (320, 373)

Q3: 468 (433, 509)

Q4: 738 (631, 940)

N per quartile of vitamin A:

Q1 (ref): 22,414

Q2: 22,415

Q3: 22,414

Q4: 22,415

Total vitamin A intake, Median, μg RAE/day (N):

Q1 (ref): 230 (22,414)

Q2‐Q4: 468 (67,244)

Preformed vitamin A intake – from the diet only

Median, μg/day:

Q1 (ref): 81

Q2–Q4: 185

Exposure assessment method: 2 × FFQ: first trimester FFQ used as main exposure (median fill‐in week of gestation = 15), and second/third trimester FFQ used in sensitivity analyses (median fill‐in week 27 of gestation). Total vitamin A reported as μg RAE (retinol + provitamin A carotenoids), conversion factors NR

Cases of CDH per quartiles of total vitamin A intake (N cases per 10,000 live births):

Q1 (ref): 14 (6.2)

Q2: 8 (3.6)

Q3: 9 (4)

Q4: 9 (4)

Q1 (ref): 14

Q2–Q4: 26

By preformed vitamin A intake:

Q1 (ref): 10

Q2–Q4: 30

In women with BMI 18.5–25 kg/m 2

Total vitamin A

Q1 (ref): 12

Q2–Q4: 18

Preformed vitamin A:

Q1 (ref): 7

Q2–Q4: 23

Model 1: adjusted for maternal age at delivery

Model 2: Adjusted for maternal age at delivery, smoking habits, alcohol consumption, pre‐pregnancy BMI, current history of diabetes or gestational diabetes and infertility treatment

Many sensitivity analyses with similar results (adjusting for socio‐economic factors, excluding supplement users, excluding mothers with morning sickness, only isolated cases of CDH, adjusted for dietary folate and vitamin C, adjusting for vitamin A intake in mid/late pregnancy)

Total vitamin A intake and CDH, OR (95% CI)

Model 1

Q1: ref

Q2‐Q4: 0.6 (0.3–1.2)

Model 2 (N = 89,481)

Q1: ref

Q2‐Q4: 0.6 (0.3–1.2)

Retinol intake and CDH, OR (95% CI)

Model 1

Q1: ref

Q2‐Q4: 1.0 (0.5–2.1)

Model 2 (N = 89,481)

Q1: ref

Q2‐Q4: 1.0 (0.5–2.0)

Total vitamin A intake and CDH in women with BMI 18.5–25 kg/m 2 , OR (95% CI)

Model 1

Q1: ref

Q2‐Q4: 0.5 (0.2–1.0)

Model 2 (N = 65,568)

Q1: ref

Q2‐Q4: 0.5 (0.2–1.0)

Retinol intake and CDH in women with BMI 18.5–25 kg/m 2 , OR (95% CI)

Model 1

Q1: ref

Q2‐Q4: 1.1 (0.5–2.5)

Model 2 (N = 65,568)

Q1: ref

Q2‐Q4: 1.0 (0.4–2.4)

Mastroiacovo et al. (1999)

13 European Teratology Information Services (TIS)

Follow‐up: from first trimester to 3–6 weeks after expected delivery (by mail or phone)

Funding: NR

Original cohort

N  = 423 pregnancies exposed to ‘high’ dose of vitamin A (10 000 IU per day [3000 μg/day] or 50,000 IU per week [15,000 μg/week]) for at least one week during first 9 weeks of gestation

Women contacted TIS either directly or through their doctor

Control groups were mothers who consulted a TIS in the same period as the study subjects

Control group 1: all infants exposed to ‘high’ vitamin A doses after 9 weeks of gestation

Control group 2: all infants exposed to a documented nonteratogenic agent

Exclusion: chromosomal or genetic diseases, as well as deformations (e.g. clubfoot), minor anomalies (e.g. preauricular tag), birth marks (e.g. nevus or angiomas), functional problems (e.g. pyloric stenosis, gastroesophageal reflux), and mild findings (e.g. hydronephrosis identified by prenatal sonography and not demanding treatment during the neonatal period), were excluded from the analysis

N with complete follow‐up (study group) = 394

N for analysis

Study group = 311

Control group 1 = 116

Control group 2 = 679

Outcome

Prevalence rate of major malformations, defined as a structural abnormality that has an adverse effect on either the functional or the social acceptability of the individual, and which called for medical or surgical treatment

Ascertainment of the outcome was done by mail or telephone interviews from doctors or mothers

Preformed vitamin A, μg RE/day (from supplements)

Cases

Median = 15,000

IQR = 7500–18,000

Min‐max = 3000–90,000

N above 15,000 μg/day = 120

N above 30,000 μg/day = 32

Main reasons for high exposures were various dermatologic conditions and breast fibrocystic disease

Dietary assessment method: NR. Preformed vitamin A expressed as IU/day, here converted to μg RE/day by a factor of 0.3

Cases of major malformations

Study group: 3

Control group 1: 4

Control group 2: 13

Model 1: No covariates

Model 2: Stratified by potential confounding factors (age, education, race, family history of birth defects) (NR)

Model 3: Regression models adjusted for age, education, race, family history of birth defects, use of folate supplements during early pregnancy, diabetes, alcohol consumption, genital herpes infection, fever, use of antiseizure medication, retinoids or exogenous hormones (NR)

Model 2 and 3 were similar to model 1, and therefore NR

Birth prevalence, % (95% CI)

Study group: 0.96 (0.25–2.60)

Control group 1: 3.45 (1.11–8.11)

Control group 2: 1.91 (1.07–3.17)

Rate ratio (95% CI)

Study group vs. control group 1: 0.28 (0.06–1.23)

Study group vs. control group 2: 0.50 (0.14–1.76)

Rothman et al. (1995)

USA

PC

Funding: Mixed

N  = 22,755

Pregnant women undergoing screening were recruited around gestational week 15–20 (1984–1987)

Exclusion: missing information on more than half of retinol‐containing foods

N for analysis = 22,748

N

Any birth defect = 339

Of which cranial neural crest defects = 121

The outcome of pregnancy was obtained from a questionnaire mailed to the obstetrician around expected time of delivery (76.5% responded); if the physician did not respond, the questionnaire was mailed to the mother (all remaining responded: 23.5%)

Outcome

Outcome was any birth defect, cranial neural‐crest defects, neural tube defects (NTDs), musculoskeletal or urogenital defects, or other defects

Preformed vitamin A, μg RE/day

Total intake (from diet + supplements)

C1: 0–1500

C2: 1501–3000

C3: 3001‐4500

C4: > 4500

Total pregnancies (n per category)

C1: 6410

C2: 12688

C3: 3150

C4: 500

From supplements only

C1: 0–1500

C2: 1501‐2400

C3: 2401–3000

C4: > 3000

Total pregnancies

C1: 11083

C2: 10585

C3: 763

C4: 317

Dietary assessment method: Assessment of diet (incl. 50 food items containing retinol) and supplement use (incl. vitamin A) conduced by telephone, focusing on the last 3 months before conception and first 8 weeks of pregnancy. Preformed vitamin A expressed as IU/day, here converted to μg/day by a factor of 0.3

Total intake (from diet + supplements)

Total defects

C1: 86 (1.3)

C2: 196 (1.5)

C3: 42 (1.3)

C4: 15 (3.0)

Cranial neural‐crest defects

C1: 33 (0.51)

C2: 59 (0.47)

C3: 20 (0.63)

C4: 9 (1.80)

NTDs

C1: 13 (0.20)

C2: 29 (0.23)

C3: 5 (0.16)

C4: 1 (0.20)

Musculoskeletal or urogenital defects

C1: 24 (0.37)

C2: 62 (0.49)

C3: 10 (0.32)

C4: 4 (0.80)

Other defects

C1: 16 (0.25)

C2: 46 (0.36)

C3: 7 (0.22)

C4: 1 (0.20)

From supplements

Total defects

C1: 148 (1.3)

C2: 168 (1.6)

C3: 13 (1.7)

C4: 10 (3.2)

Cranial neural‐crest defects

C1: 51 (0.46)

C2: 54 (0.51)

C3: 9 (1.18)

C4: 7 (2.21)

Model 1: No covariates

Model 2: Stratified by potential confounding factors (age, education, race, family history of birth defects) (NR)

Model 3: Regression models adjusted for age, education, race, family history of birth defects, use of folate supplements during early pregnancy, diabetes, alcohol consumption, genital herpes infection, fever, use of antiseizure medication, retinoids or exogenous hormones (NR)

Preformed vitamin A (from diet + supplements)

Prevalence ratio (95% CI)

Model 1:

Cranial neural crest defects

C4 vs. C1: 3.5 (1.7, 7.3)

All birth defects

C4 vs. C1: 2.2 (1.3, 3.8)

Preformed vitamin A (from supplements only)

Prevalence ratio (95% CI)

All birth defects

C4 vs. C1: 2.4 (1.3–4.4)

Cranial neural crest defects

C4 vs. C1: 4.8 (2.2–10.5)

Models 2 and 3 were similar to model 1, and therefore NR

Smoothed curves (unrestricted quadratic splines) indicated a threshold at ~ 3000 μg RE/day where the prevalence ratio increased (both total preformed vitamin A and preformed vitamin A from supplements only)

NTDs

C1: 21 (0.19)

C2: 26 (0.25)

C3: 1 (0.13)

C4: 0

Musculoskeletal or urogenital defects

C1: 44 (0.40)

C2: 52 (0.49)

C3: 2 (0.26)

C4: 2 (0.63)

Other defects

C1: 32 (0.29)

C2: 36 (0.34)

C3: 1 (0.13)

C4: 1 (0.32)

Bille et al. (2007)

Denmark

Danish National Birth Cohort

Prospective case‐cohort study

Funding: Public

N

Total birth cohort ~100,000

Cases = 220

Controls = 880

Exclusion criteria: Twins were excluded and pregnancies not leading to births.

Controls: Randomly selected from the birth cohort.

% lost to follow up

Cases: 8.2

Controls: 6

Periconceptional vitamin A supplement use (first weeks of pregnancy), %:

Cases: 53

Controls: 58

Cases identified through maternally reported or a discharge diagnosis of oral clefts, including cleft lip with or without (±) cleft palate and isolated cleft palate cases, or an ICD code for reconstructive surgery on lips or palate.

Preformed vitamin A intake from supplements only (μg/day)

Binary (yes/no)

Cases: 102 /90

Control: 480/348

Categorical (μg/day, from suppl. only),

C1: 0

C2: 0–400

C3: 400–800

C4: ≥ 800

n cases/controls per category of intake:

C1: 90/348

C2: 40 /173

C3: 25/154

C4: 37/153

Exposure assessment method:

Data on daily supplement use was obtained through a questionnaire at enrolment

Total cases = 192

Cleft lip ± cleft palate cases = 134

Cleft palate cases = 58

Controls = 828

Model 1: No covariates, NR

Model 2: Adjusted for parental age and social class

Results reported for binary, continuous (unit not reported, probably per 1 μg increment), and categorical (3 and 4 categories).

OR (95% CI)

All oral clefts

Binary: 0.82 (0.59–1.13)

Continuous: 0.99 (0.99–1.00)

Categorical analysis

C1: ref

C2: 0.93 (0.61–1.43)

C3: 0.62 (0.38–1.02)

C4: 0.90 (0.57–1.40)

Cleft lip ± cleft palate

Binary: 0.73 (0.50–1.06)

Continuous: 0.99 (0.99–1)

Categorical analysis

C1: ref

C2: 0.69 (0.41–1.18)

C3: 0.51 (0.28–0.93)

C4: 1.00 (0.61–1.63)

Isolated cleft palate

Binary: 1.06 (0.6–1.86)

Continuous: 0.99 (0.99–1.00)

Categorical analysis

C1: ref

C2: 1.60 (0.82–3.11)

C3: 0.93 (0.41–2.10)

C4: 0.60 (0.24–1.50)

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CDH, congenital diaphragmatic hernia; FFQ, food frequency questionnaire; NR, not reported; NTD, Neural tube defects; OR, odds ratio; RAE, retinol activity equivalents; RE, retinol equivalents.