Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jun 6.
Published in final edited form as: J Ethnopharmacol. 2022 Oct 9;301:115822. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2022.115822

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Effects of various medicinal plant extracts on the activity of hAhR. AhR reporter cells were treated with different concentrations of extract (30, 10, and 3.33 μg/mL), positive control (Me-bio: 1000, 500, and 250 nM), or vehicle control (DMSO) for 24 h. Following incubation, luciferase activity was measured. Based upon fold increase in luciferase activity, tested plants were categorized as follows: (a) Potent activators (≥10-fold); (b) Strong activators (>5 – <10-fold); (c) Mild activators (>2 – <5-fold). Weak (<2-fold) or non-activators are presented in the supplementary data (Table S3). L, S, R and MP represent leaf, stem, root and mixed parts, respectively. Statistical significance is shown compared to DMSO control. ap < 0.0001; bp < 0.001; cp < 0.01, dp < 0.05 and ns = not significant. The abbreviations are representing as L = leaves, S = seed, R = root, F = fruit, ST = stem, B = bark, G = gum, FL = flower, FB = flower bud, SC = seed coat, Rh = rhizome, AP = aerial part, and MP = mixed part.