Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 6;7:149. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01141-5

Table 4.

Calibration statistics for MUST-plus model by race and gender

No Recalibration Recalibration In the Large Logistic Recalibration
Weak Calibration Moderate Calibration Weak Calibration Moderate Calibration Weak Calibration Moderate Calibration
Calibration Intercept (95% CI) Calibration Slope (95% CI) Rescaled Brier Score (95% CI) Emax (95% CI) Eavg (95% CI) Calibration Intercept (95% CI) Calibration Slope (95% CI) Rescaled Brier Score (95% CI) Emax (95% CI) Eavg (95% CI) Calibration Intercept (95% CI) Calibration Slope (95% CI) Rescaled Brier Score (95% CI) Emax (95% CI) Eavg (95% CI)
Black −1.07 (−1.11, −1.02) 1.43 (1.37, 1.49) 0.30 (0.29, 0.31) 0.23 (0.22, 0.24) 0.17 (0.16, 0.18) 0.43 (0.36, 0.50) 1.43 (1.37, 1.49) 0.23 (0.21, 0.24) 0.15 (0.10, 0.19) 0.04 (0.04, 0.05) 0 (-0.07, 0.05) 0.91 (0.87, 0.95) 0.23 (0.21, 0.25) 0.08 (0.04, 0.11) 0.01 (0, 0.02)
White −1.17 (−1.21, −1.12) 1.29 (1.23, 1.35) 0.24 (0.23, 0.24) 0.26 (0.25, 0.27) 0.20 (0.19, 0.20) 0.25 (0.19, 0.31) 1.29 (1.24, 1.34) 0.20 (0.18, 0.21) 0.20 (0.15, 0.25) 0.03 (0.02, 0.03) −0.15 (−0.20, −0.10) 0.82 (0.78, 0.85) 0.19 (0.18, 0.21) 0.05 (0.02, 0.09) 0.02 (0.01, 0.03)
Male −0.88 (−0.92, −0.84) 1.40 (1.36, 1.45) 0.29 (0.29, 0.30) 0.20 (0.19, 0.21) 0.15 (0.14, 0.16) 0.39 (0.34, 0.44) 1.40 (1.36, 1.45) 0.22 (0.21, 0.24) 0.18 (0.15, 0.21) 0.04 (0.03, 0.05) 0 (−0.05, 0.03) 0.88 (0.85, 0.90) 0.23 (0.22, 0.24) 0.04 (0.03, 0.07) 0.02 (0.01, 0.02)
Female −1.49 (−1.54, −1.45) 1.42 (1.37, 1.47) 0.22 (0.21, 0.23) 0.32 (0.31, 0.32) 0.24 (0.23, 0.24) 0.40 (0.34, 0.47) 1.42 (1.37, 1.47) 0.20 (0.19, 0.22) 0.24 (0.20, 0.29) 0.04 (0.03, 0.04) −0.11 (−0.16, −0.06) 0.91(0.87, 0.94) 0.21(0.20, 0.22) 0.02 (0.01, 0.05) 0.01 (0, 0.01)

Bold indicates a statistically significant difference in calibration metric between pairs (Black vs. White, Male vs. Female).