Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 6;14:13036. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63806-1

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of enrolled participants.

Characteristics (N = 575) N (%)/mean ± s.d
Age 59.63 ± 10.13
Sex
 Male 362 (63.0%)
 Female 213 (37.0%)
Tumor type
 Gastric cancer 115 (20.0%)
 Colorectal cancer 310 (53.9%)
 Hepatocellular carcinoma 60 (10.4%)
 Esophageal cancer 30 (5.2%)
 Pancreatic cancer 36 (6.3%)
 Biliary malignant tumor 24 (4.2%)
Stage
 I 41 (7.1%)
 II 134 (23.3%)
 III 181 (31.5%)
 IV 219 (38.1%)
Smoke history (n = 471a)
 No 250
 Yes/ever 221
Alcohol history (n = 471a)
 No 341
 Yes/ever 130
Nutrition support (n = 471a)
 No 285
 Yes/ever 186
BMI 22.55 ± 3.35
KPS 88.30 ± 11.30
Nutritional statusb
 Well-nourished 148 (25.74%)
 Moderate malnutrition 260 (45.22%)
 Severe malnutrition 167 (29.04%)
HRQoL 68.70 ± 20.15
Treatment after admission
 Surgical resection 350 (60.87%)
 Chemotherapy 497 (86.43%)
 Radiotherapy 36 (6.26%)
 Targeted therapy 50 (8.70%)
 Immunotherapy 17 (2.96%)

BMI, body mass index; KPS, Karnofsky performance status; PG-SGA, the patient-generated subjective global assessment; HRQoL, health-related quality of life.

aDue to missing or low-quality data, some participants lack information on smoke history, alcohol history and nutritional support. The sample size that can be used after quality control is 471, accounting for 82% of the total sample size.

bNutritional status was classified according to the PG-SGA scores: Well-nourished (PG-SGA scores ≤ 2 points); Moderate malnutrition (3 ≤ PG-SGA scores ≤ 8 points); Severe malnutrition (PG-SGA scores ≥ 9 points).