Table 2.
Characteristics of CPG for the diagnosis and management of RVO.
Characteristic | Sub-characteristic | RCO | EURETINA | PPP | SERV | CEC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guideline status | Update | New | Update | Update | New | |
Developer organization | Society | Society | Society | Society | Private | |
Funding | NR | NR | Yes | NR | Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada | |
Development group | Number | 5 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 11 |
Affiliation details | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes. | |
Specialty/sub-specialty details | No | No | No | No | No | |
Non-physician specialist | No | No | No | No | No | |
Haematologist | Yes | No | No | No | No | |
Population representative | No | No | No | No | No | |
Methodologist | No | No | Yes | No | No | |
External review | NR | NR | Yes | Yes | NR | |
General features | Objective | Yes | NO | Yes | Yes | No |
Scope | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | |
Target users | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | |
Population | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | |
Evidence search | Search strategy | Yes | No | Yes | No | No |
Number of referenced citations | 140 | 158 | 111 | 174 | 117 | |
Update | Previous guide | 2015 | NA | 2015 (2021a) | 2010 | NA |
Next update | 2025 | NA | 2024 | NR | NA | |
Detailed declaration of conflict of interest | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | |
Monitoring and/or auditing criteria | Yes | No | No | No | No | |
Evidence and grading of recommendations | NR | NR |
Level of evidence: SIGN Recommendation: GRADE |
US Agency for Health Research and Quality | Own level of evidence system |
NR not reported, NA not applicable, RCO Royal College of Ophthalmologists, EURETINA European Society of Retina Specialists, PPP Preferred Practice Pattern, SERV Sociedad Española de Retina y Vítreo, CEC Canadian Expert Consensus.
aAvailable at SERV website (only for SERV member) report: ‘Last modification: 17/09/2021’.