Skip to main content
. 2024 May 24;14:1297074. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1297074

Table 4.

Comparison of some sociodemographic characteristics of the patients and their post-treatment scale scores.

EFS LS EQ-5D-5L Quick DASH HSA EV
Median (Q1-Q3)
Profession Housewife 1 7
(5-11)
1
(1-1)
5
(5-7)
19.3
(9.1-27.3)
80
(80 -90)
311
(206.3-394.3)
Civil Servant/Retired2 4
(1-7)
1
(1-1)
5
(5-5)
6.8
(–15.9)
80
(80 -85)
187
(175.5-381.5)
Teacher 3 1
(1-1)
5
(5-5)
- 90
(90 -90)
244
(244-244)
X2* 14.904 3.706 4.199 13.494 6.767 3.327
p** 0.001 0.151 0.123 0.001 0.034 0.189
Marital Status Married 6
(3.5-9)
1
(1-1)
5
(5-6)
15.5
(6.8-27.27)
90
(80 -90)
287
(187-354.5)
Single 8
(1-10)
1
(1-1)
5
(5-7)
15.9
(6.8-20.45)
80
(80 -90)
330
(187-432)
Z* 0.091 -0.635 -0.048 -1.312 -2.277 0.584
p 0.928 0.525 0.962 0.190 0.023 0.584
Chronical Disease Yes 7
(4.25-11)
1
(1-1)
5
(5-6)
15.9
(9.7-27.27)
80
(80 -90)
312
(222-420)
No 4.5
(1-8.75)
1
(1-1)
5
(5-6.5)
10.22
(–20.45)
80
(80 -90)
189
(166-246)
Z* -2.453 -0.577 -1.174 -2.290 -1.648 -3.248
p** 0.014 0.056 0.24 0.022 0.099 0.001

X2*, Kruskal-Wallis H test; Z*, Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test; CDT, Complex Decongestive Therapy; ml, Milliliters; DASH, Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand; EFS, The Edmonton Frailty Scale; EQ-5D-5L, The 5-level EQ-5D version; EV, Extremity volume; HSA, Health status assessment; LS, Lymphedema stage. **p<0,05.