Table 1.
Comparison on family cognitive environment characteristics between the case and control group
| Dimension | Evaluation | Case group (n = 172) | Control group (n = 516) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | <0.001 | |||
| Good | 53 (30.81) | 226 (43.80) | ||
| Intermediate | 78 (45.35) | 282 (54.65) | ||
| Poor | 41 (23.84) | 8 (1.55) | ||
| Warmth | <0.001 | |||
| Good | 55 (31.98) | 226 (43.8) | ||
| Intermediate | 87 (50.58) | 287 (55.62) | ||
| Poor | 30 (17.44) | 3 (0.58) | ||
| Social adaptation | <0.001 | |||
| Good | 56 (32.56) | 221 (42.83) | ||
| Intermediate | 81 (47.09) | 290 (56.2) | ||
| Poor | 35 (20.35) | 5 (0.97) | ||
| Languageenvironment | <0.001 | |||
| Good | 60 (34.88) | 222 (43.02) | ||
| Intermediate | 78 (45.35) | 281 (54.46) | ||
| Poor | 34 (19.77) | 13 (2.52) | ||
| Neglect environment | 0.003 | |||
| Good | 62 (36.05) | 230 (44.57) | ||
| Intermediate | 91 (52.91) | 276 (53.49) | ||
| Poor | 19 (11.05) | 10 (1.94) | ||