Skip to main content
. 2024 May 28;10:e2053. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2053

Table 1. The mAP of AMD-I-FGSM and AMD-PGD on YOLOv4-NWPU model, YOLOv5s-NWPU model, the YOLOv4-DIOR model, YOLOv5m-DIOR model and YOLOv5l-DIOR model.

Model Method Para setting mAP ↓
α β γ μ
YoloV4-NWPU FGSM (Im Choi & Qing, 2022) 67.97%
PGD-10 (Im Choi & Qing, 2022) 7.05%
I-FGSM 5.0 1.0 5.0 0.0 3.08%
PGD 5.0 1.0 5.0 0.0 4.53%
CPS-PGD 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 3.46%
ADM-I-IFGSM (Ours) 5.0 1.0 5.0 2.9 0.8%
ADM -PGD (Ours) 5.0 1.0 5.0 4.1 2.24%
YoloV5s-NWPU FGSM (Im Choi & Qing, 2022) 58.32%
PGD-10 (Im Choi & Qing, 2022) 13.48%
I-FGSM 1.0 5.0 1.0 0.0 7.14%
PGD 1.0 5.0 3.0 0.0 11.78%
CPS-PGD 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 7.2%
ADM-I-IFGSM (Ours) 1.0 5.0 1.0 2.1 6.56%
ADM–PGD (Ours) 1.0 5.0 3.0 3.3 10.50%
YoloV4-DIOR FGSM (Im Choi & Qing, 2022) 43.52%
PGD-10 (Im Choi & Qing, 2022) 5.38%
I-FGSM 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 2.53%
PGD 5.0 5.0 3.0 0.0 2.55%
CPS-PGD 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2.83%
ADM-I-IFGSM (Ours) 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.6 2.04%
ADM-PGD (Ours) 5.0 5.0 3.0 2.7 1.88%
Yolov5m-DIOR FGSM (Im Choi & Qing, 2022) 46.14%
PGD-10 (Im Choi & Qing, 2022) 10.54%
I-FGSM 1.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 4.95%
PGD 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 6.92%
CPS-PGD 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.33%
ADM-I-IFGSM (Ours) 1.0 5.0 5.0 3.3 2.84%
ADM-PGD (Ours) 1.0 1.0 1.0 6.8 4.64%
Yolov5l-DIOR FGSM (Im Choi & Qing, 2022) 48.74%
PGD-10 (Im Choi & Qing, 2022) 10.07%
I-FGSM 5.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 4.84%
PGD 3.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 5.26%
CPS-PGD 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 3.09%
ADM-I-IFGSM (Ours) 5.0 3.0 3.0 1.3 3.18%
ADM-PGD (Ours) 3.0 3.0 1.0 2.8 4.09%