Skip to main content
. 2024 May 28;10:e2053. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2053

Table 2. The different targets’ AP of YOLOv4-NWPU under different adversarial attacks.

Kind name I-FGSM ADM-I-FGSM Difference PGD ADM-PGD Difference
Airplane 6.64% 1.62% 5.02% 9.50% 3.27% 6.23%
Ship 1.81% 0.43% 1.38% 2.73% 1.30% 1.43%
Storage tank 0.25% 1.62% −1.36% 0.40% 3.25% −2.85%
Baseball diamond 7.72% 0.93% 6.79% 15.76% 1.39% 14.37%
Tennis court 9.10% 0.12% 8.99% 9.23% 0.39% 8.84%
Basketball court 0.01% 0.01% 0.00% 0.01% 0.01% 0.00%
Ground track field 4.99% 1.05% 3.94% 6.82% 3.08% 3.74%
Harbor 0.02% 0.01% 0.02% 0.54% 0.93% −0.39%
Bridge 0.01% 0.00% 0.01% 0.01% 0.00% 0.01%
Vehicle 0.28% 2.19% −1.91% 0.33% 8.79% −8.46%
mAP 3.08% 0.8% 2.28% 4.53% 2.24% 2.29%

Note:

The difference is equal to the AP without ADM method minus the AP with ADM method.