Table 4. The optimal solution and the optimal mAP for μ in the ADM-I-FGSM and ADM-PGD.
| Method | Plan | mAP ↓ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADM-I-FGSM | A | 1.7 | 1.46% |
| B | 0.9 | 1.45% | |
| C | 2.9 | 0.8% | |
| ADM-PGD | A | 2.5 | 2.93% |
| B | 3.0 | 2.55% | |
| C | 4.1 | 2.24% |
| Method | Plan | mAP ↓ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADM-I-FGSM | A | 1.7 | 1.46% |
| B | 0.9 | 1.45% | |
| C | 2.9 | 0.8% | |
| ADM-PGD | A | 2.5 | 2.93% |
| B | 3.0 | 2.55% | |
| C | 4.1 | 2.24% |