Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 7;20:250. doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-04022-x

Table 1.

Effect of PRP concentrations and extender types on equilibrated sperm quality (mean ± SEM)

Extender PRP (%) N Progressive motility (%) Viability (%) Abnormality (%)
OptiXcell® A 0% 48 57.17 ± 1.20b 79.67 ± 1.56b 13.83 ± 0.95a
5% 48 60.33 ± 2.57ab 82.50 ± 1.28ab 11.83 ± 1.25a
10% 48 64.33 ± 2.04a 85.50 ± 1.23a 7.50 ± 0.99b
15% 48 62.83 ± 1.74ab 84.33 ± 1.33a 8.33 ± 0.96b
Tris egg yolk-based B 0% 48 54.50 ± 0.76c 78.17 ± 1.60b 15.67 ± 1.33a
5% 48 56.67 ± 0.80bc 79.83 ± 1.25ab 13.17 ± 0.98ab
10% 48 61.50 ± 1.88a 82.83 ± 1.51a 10.83 ± 1.14b
15% 48 60.17 ± 1.45ab 81.77 ± 0.98ab 10.33 ± 0.56b

N = 48 ejaculates. Within columns, values with different superscripts differ significantly for each parameter (P< 0.05)

Within the same column, means bearing a, b, and c differ among PRP concentrations (0%, 5%, 10% and 15%) within the same extender (OptiXcell® or Tris egg yolk-based). A and B differ between extender types (OptiXcell® or Tris egg yolk-based), at the same PRP concentrations (0%, 5%, 10% and 15%)

PRP, Platelet-rich plasma