Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 7;20:250. doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-04022-x

Table 3.

Effect of PRP concentrations and extender types on post-thaw sperm quality (mean ± SEM)

Extender PRP (%) N Progressive motility (%) Viability (%) Abnormality (%)
OptiXcell® A 0% 48 46.50 ± 0.73c 75.50 ± 0.62c 18.67 ± 0.29a
5% 48 49.17 ± 0.60b 78.67 ± 0.29b 15.17 ± 0.48b
10% 48 52.34 ± 0.96a 80.83 ± 0.75a 9.67 ± 0.49c
15% 48 51.17 ± 0.30a 80.17 ± 0.62ab 10.83 ± 0.38c
Tris egg yolk-based B 0% 48 43.67 ± 0.53c 73.17 ± 0.40b 21.17 ± 0.48a
5% 48 45.16 ± 0.58bc 74.50 ± 0.55b 18.93 ± 0.70b
10% 48 47.25 ± 0.84a 76.67 ± 0.88a 14.17 ± 0.36c
15% 48 45.67 ± 0.52ab 76.00 ± 0.41a 15.66 ± 0.22c

N = 48 ejaculates. Within columns, values with different superscripts differ significantly for each parameter (P< 0.05)

Within the same column, means bearing a, b, and c differ among PRP concentrations (0%, 5%, 10% and 15%) within the same extender (OptiXcell® or Tris egg yolk-based). A and B differ between extender types (OptiXcell® or Tris egg yolk-based), at the same PRP concentrations (0%, 5%, 10% and 15%). PRP, Platelet-rich plasma