Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec 4;101(3):594–600. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01453.x

Table 1.

 Patients’ and healthy donors’ characteristics

ID Gender Age Disease Prior therapy Disease status Residual disease detected by RT‐PCR
Patients AML‐1 F 55 AML without maturation Chemotherapy, WT1 vaccination 2nd CR (High levels of WT1)
AML‐2 F 66 AML with maturation Chemotherapy 1st CR (High levels of WT1)
AML‐3 M 64 AML with t(8; 21)(q22; q22) Chemotherapy 2nd CR (Positivity of AML1/ETO)
AML‐4 F 45 AML with t(15; 17)(q22; q12) Chemotherapy 2nd CR (Positivity of PML/RARα)
MDS‐1 M 62 Secondary MDS, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia Chemotherapy for prior AML (High levels of WT1)
MDS‐2 M 66 MDS, refractory anemia with excess blasts‐2 Best supportive care (High levels of WT1)
MDS‐3 M 69 AML transformed from MDS Chemotherapy 1st CR (High levels of WT1)
MDS‐4 M 58 MDS, refractory anemia with excess blasts‐2 Best supportive care (High levels of WT1)
Healthy donors HD‐1 F 23
HD‐2 M 24
HD‐3 M 30
HD‐4 F 25
HD‐5 F 26

AML, acute myeloid leukemia; CR, complete remission; ETO, eight twenty one; HD, healthy donor; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; PML, promyelocytic leukemia; RARα, retinoic acid receptor‐α; WT1, Wilms’ tumor gene 1.