Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 1;100(10):1842–1847. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01268.x

Table 3.

Cox proportional hazard regression analysis for cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and prednisolone (CHOP) and rituximab (R)‐CHOP

Clinical outcome CHOP (n = 451) R‐CHOP (n = 279)
HR (95% CI) P‐value HR (95% Cl) P‐value
OS Bcl‐2 (+ vs –) 1.331 (1.000–1.773) 0.049 1.160 (0.653–2.062) 0.612
  Bcl‐6 (– vs +) 1.243 (0.896–1.724) 0.194 2.173 (1.116–4.230) 0.022
  Age (per year) 1.028 (1.014–1.042) <0.001 1.032 (1.009–1.055) 0.006
  Clinical stage (III–IV vs I–II) 1.940 (1.438–2.617) <0.001 1.986 (1.031–3.825) 0.040
  ECOG PS (II–IV vs 0–I) 1.400 (0.998–1.964) 0.050 2.526 (1.366–4.670) 0.003
  Lactate dehydrogenase (>normal) 1.817 (1.350–2.444) <0.001 2.416 (1.247–4.679) 0.009
  No. extranodal sites (≥2 vs 0–1) 1.233 (0.862–1.763) 0.251 0.976 (0.505–1.885) 0.942

Adjusted for age, cell origin, and center effect. CI, confidence interval; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; HR, hazard ratio.