Skip to main content
. 2009 Nov 27;101(3):646–651. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01451.x

Table 2.

 Univariate and multivariate proportional hazard analyses of cancer‐specific survival (n = 106)

Variable Univariate Multivariate
Hazard ratio 95% index P‐values Hazard ratio 95% index P‐values
Serum PSA (ng/dL) (≥10 vs <10) 1.02 0.32–3.26 0.98 1.39 0.39–5.01 0.6
Gleason score (≥8 vs≤7) 17.2 3.34–314 0.0001 7.63 0.94–168 0.06
Pathological T stage (≥3b vs≤3a) 11.4 2.99–74.3 0.0002 2.38 0.42–20.9 0.34
Pathological N stage (1 vs 0) 5.29 1.56–16.6 0.0094 1.01 0.26–3.69 0.98
ERRs (high ERRα and low ERRγvs low ERRα and high ERRγ or others) 23.2 3.73–173 0.0006 15.2 1.65–186 0.015

We divided the data into three groups on the basis of immunoreactivity: high ERRα and low ERRγ, low ERRα and high ERR and other immunoreactivity groups. ERR, estrogen‐related receotor; PSA, prostate‐specific antigen.