Table 1.
Characteristic | Cases | |
---|---|---|
n | % | |
Ductal carcinoma in situ | ||
Patients (n) | 102 | |
Age (years) | ||
Mean | 54.16 | |
Range | 29–79 | |
Nuclear grade | ||
Low | 24 | 23.5 |
Intermediate | 42 | 41.2 |
High | 36 | 35.3 |
Comedo | ||
Absent | 59 | 57.8 |
Present | 43 | 42.2 |
Predominant architecture | ||
Cribriform | 31 | 30.4 |
Solid | 13 | 12.7 |
Micropapillary | 24 | 23.5 |
Others | 11 | 10.8 |
Pure comedo | 23 | 22.6 |
Invasive ductal carcinoma | ||
Patients (n) | 40 | |
Age (years) | ||
Mean | 51.65 | |
Range | 31–75 | |
Nuclear grade | ||
Low | 5 | 12.5 |
Intermediate | 16 | 40.0 |
High | 19 | 47.5 |
Predominant architecture | ||
Papillotubular | 19 | 47.5 |
Scirrhous | 11 | 27.5 |
Solid‐tubular | 10 | 25.0 |
pT stage | ||
1 | 21 | 52.5 |
2 | 19 | 47.5 |
pN stage | ||
0 | 29 | 72.5 |
1 | 11 | 27.5 |
Stage | ||
I | 16 | 40.0 |
IIa | 17 | 42.5 |
IIb | 7 | 17.5 |