Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan 13;100(4):639–645. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.01078.x

Table 3.

Association between chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter transcription factor (COUP‐TF) II immunoreactivity and clinicopathological parameters in 119 breast carcinomas

Variable Patient number COUP‐TFII labeling index (%) P‐value P‐value adjusted by Bonferroni
Menopausal status
 pre‐ 51 24.9 ± 3.4
 post‐ 68 27.5 ± 3.3 0.7616
Stage
 I 32 21.9 ± 4.5
 II 58 22.6 ± 3.0 0.9071 (I vs II)
 III 13 26.0 ± 7.6 0.6247 (I vs III)
 IV 16 44.8 ± 7.4 0.0037 (I vs IV) 0.0222
Tumor size (cm)
 ≥2.5 65 26.6 ± 3.1
 <2.5 54 24.8 ± 3.6 0.582
Lymph node status
 Positive 46 34.1 ± 4.3
 Negative 73 20.5 ± 2.6 0.0369
Histological grade
 1 (well) 34 15.3 ± 3.3
 2 (moderate) 44 28.6 ± 4.0 0.0231 (1 vs 2) 0.0693
 3 (poor) 41 31.3 ± 4.4 0.0074 (1 vs 3) 0.0222
Estrogen receptor α status
 Positive 83 29.8 ± 3.0
 Negative 36 16.5 ± 3.6 0.0050
Progesterone receptor status
 Positive 78 26.7 ± 2.9
 Negative 41 24.0 ± 4.2 0.2964
Ki‐67 status
 Positive 72 28.8 ± 3.1
 Negative 47 21.1 ± 3.6 0.1157
HER2 status
 Positive 27 28.2 ± 5.5
 Negative 92 25.4 ± 2.6 0.8364

Data are presented as means ± SEM. All other values represent the number of cases. P‐values less than 0.05 were considered significant, and are shown in bold. HER, XXX.