Skip to main content

Table 3.

Hazard ratios (HR) of cancer survival according to marital status, presence or absence of confidants and satisfaction level with confidants

Characteristics Marital status Confidants Satisfaction level with confidants
Married Unmarried P‐value Presence Absence P‐value Extremely fairly satisfied Somewhat satisfied– extremely dissatisfied P‐value
No. subjects 196 42 201 37 179 59
Person‐months of follow up 70 (0–91) 73 (6–91) 71 (0–91) 65 (6–86) 71 (0–91) 67 (6–88)
No. deaths from all causes 50 7 46 11 43 14
Unadjusted HR 1.0 (referent) 0.6 (0.3–1.4) 0.26 1.0 (referent) 1.4 (0.7–2.7) 0.34 1.0 (referent) 1.0 (0.6–1.9) 0.96
Sex‐, age‐adjusted HR 1.0 (referent) 0.7 (0.3–1.6) 0.37 1.0 (referent) 1.3 (0.6–2.5) 0.50 1.0 (referent) 0.9 (0.5–1.8) 0.93
Multivariable‐ adjusted HR 1.0 (referent) 0.8 (0.3–1.8) 0.53 1.0 (referent) 1.0 (0.5–2.2) 0.90 1.0 (referent) 0.7 (0.4–1.3) 0.21

Cox proportional hazards regression was used to adjust multivariable HR for age in years at cancer diagnosis (≤59, 60–69, ≥70), sex, smoking status (never‐smoker, ex‐smoker or current smoker), smoking status after surgery (never‐smoker, ex‐smoker, quit smoker or continued smoker), occasion of diagnosis (mass screening or health checkup, subjective symptoms, follow up for other diseases or unknown), pathological stage (IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or IIIA), and albumin.