Skip to main content
. 2011 May 26;102(7):1298–1305. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.01958.x

Table 4.

 Cox’s proportional hazards model analysis of prognostic factors in patients with colorectal cancer

Variables Hazards ratio 95% CI Unfavorable/favorable P‐value
Univariate analysis
 EZH2 0.391 0.185–0.827 Positive/negative 0.014*
 Age(years) 0.958 0.409–1.157 ≥65/<65 0.158
 Gender 1.022 0.611–1.710 Male/female 0.934
 Serum CEA level 3.862 2.294–6.500  5.0>/5.0≤ <0.001*
 Serum CA19‐9 level 2.534 1.495–4.293 37>/37≤ 0.001*
 pT factor 4.517 1.102–18.516 T1≥/T2≤ 0.036*
 pN factor 2.450 1.441–4.167 N/N+ 0.001*
 M factor 8.570 4.986–14.731 M0/M1 <0.001*
Multivariate analysis
 EZH2 0.423 0.185–0.967 Positive/negative 0.041*
 Age(years) 0.958 0.548–1.675 ≥65/<65 0.881
 Gender 1.196 0.688–2.078 Male/female 0.526
 Serum CEA level 1.445 0.731–2.858 5.0>/5.0≤ 0.29
 Serum CA19‐9 level 1.169 0.604–2.262 37>/37≤ 0.643
 pT factor 2.089 0.483–9.031 T1≥/T2≤ 0.324
 pN factor 1.447 0.783–2.673 N/N+ 0.238
 M factor 4.620 2.380–8.969 M0/M1 <0.001*

*P < 0.05 (Fisher’s exact test). CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CI, confidence interval.