Skip to main content

Table 2.

Logistic regression analyses of associations between epidermal growth factor promoter polymorphisms and risk of gastric cancer

Genotype Cases (n = 617) Controls (n = 660) Crude OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI)
n % n %
EGF G61A
 GG 333 54.0 314 47.6 1.00 1.00
 GA 242 39.2 289 43.8 0.79 (0.63–0.99) 0.78 (0.62–0.99)
 AA  42  6.8  57  8.6 0.70 (0.45–1.07) 0.68 (0.44–1.05)
 GA/AA 284 46.0 346 52.4 0.77 (0.62–0.96) 0.77 (0.61–0.95)
 A allele 326 26.4 403 30.5
EGF G‐1380A
 GG 451 73.1 462 70.0 1.00 1.00
 GA 143 23.2 173 26.2 0.85 (0.66–1.10) 0.83 (0.64–1.08)
 AA  23  3.7  25  3.8 0.94 (0.53–1.69) 0.95 (0.53–1.70)
 GA/AA 166 26.9 198 30.0 0.86 (0.67–1.10) 0.85 (0.66–1.08)
 A allele 189 15.3 223 16.9
EGF A‐1744G
 AA 408 66.1 403 61.1 1.00 1.00
 AG 181 29.3 234 35.5 0.76 (0.60–0.97) 0.77 (0.61–0.98)
 GG  28  4.5  23  3.5 1.20 (0.68–2.12) 1.25 (0.71–2.22)
 AG/GG 209 33.9 257 38.9 0.80 (0.64–1.01) 0.81 (0.65–1.02)
 G allele 237 19.2 280 21.2
Combined analysis
 No variant locus 117 19.0  74 11.2 1.00 1.00
 One variant locus 343 55.6 373 56.5 0.58 (0.42–0.81) 0.58 (0.42–0.80)
 Two to three variant loci 157 25.5 213 32.3 0.47 (0.33–0.67) 0.46 (0.32–0.66)

Adjusted for age, sex, smoking status and drinking status.

Assuming dominant genetic model in each locus, that is, heterozygote and variant homozygote versus wild type homozygote. CI, confidence interval; EGF, epidermal growth factor gene; OR, odds ratio.