Skip to main content
. 2022 May 1;33(5):387–396. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2022.21253

Table 6.

Comparison of the Mean Scores of IES-R, STAI-S, and STAI-T Among the Participants by Gender

IES-R total Intrusion Avoidance Hyperarousal STAI-S STAI-T
I-CD (mean ± SD)
 Male 22.8 ± 13.2 6.9 ± 5.7 11.1 ± 5 4.9 ± 4.6 38.2 ± 11.4 43.4 ± 10.6
 Female 24 ± 14.7 7.3 ± 6 11 ± 5.7 5.8 ± 5.2 40.9 ± 11.8 45.8 ± 10.5
 Total 23.4 ± 13.9 7 ± 5.8 11 ± 5.3 5.3 ± 4.9 39.4 ± 11.6 44.4 ± 10.6
 t 0.71 0.59 −0.21 1.55 1.93 1.90
II-UC (mean ± SD)
 Male 21.8 ± 15.9 6.7 ± 6.2 9.9 ± 6 5.1 ± 5.4 38.9 ± 13.3 43.1 ± 12.1
 Female 26.9 ± 14.9 8.5 ± 6.4 11.8 ± 4.8 6.6 ± 5.7 39.9 ± 11.4 45.9 ± 11.1
 Total 24.6 ± 15.6 7.66 ± 6.3 10.97 ± 5.4 5.9 ± 5.6 39.5 ± 12.3 44.6 ± 11.6
 t 2.44* 2.10* 2.52* 1.96 0.60 1.80
III-controls (mean ± SD)
 Male 22.5 ± 13.1 7.2 ± 5.3 11.5 ± 5.6 3.8 ± 4.3 37.4 ± 10.2 38.9 ± 8.8
 Female 27.5 ± 14.4 9.4 ± 6.1 12.3 ± 5.5 5.8 ± 5.1 41.4 ± 11.6 43.9 ± 10.2
 Total 25.3 ± 14.0 8.4 ± 5.8 11.9 ± 5.5 4.9 ± 4.8 39.7 ± 11.2 41.7 ± 9.9
 t 3.10** 3.34** 1.15 3.67** 3.14** 4.51**

CD, Crohn’s disease; UC, ulcerative colitis; SD, standard deviation.

* P < .05; ** P < .01.

Post hoc analysis results (adjusted P value in Turkey correction).

Intrusion scores

Group I versus Group III, P < .05; Group I females versus Group III females, P < .05.

STAI-T scores

Group I versus Group III, P < .01; Group II versus Group III, P < .01; Group I males versus Group III males, P < .01; Group II males versus Group III males, P < .01.

The remaining P values did not show statistical significance.