Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 24;59(6):765–776. doi: 10.1038/s41409-024-02252-z

Table 2.

Response in pediatric patients with aGvHD among the included papers.

Author N. of pts S (%) OR (%) L(%) OR(%) G(%) OR (%) III-IV (%) OR in III-IV (%) ORR % CR % NR % TF % TTR days TTCR days
Khandelwal 11 7 (53) 2 (28) 2 (15) 0 12 (92) 3 (25) 11 (84) NA 45 9 18 36 NA NA
González Vicent 13 8 (61) (75ORR 33 CR) 4 (31) (73ORR18 CR) 6(46) 77 ORR31 CR 13 (100) (77) 77 31 23 NA NA NA
Uygun 13 NA NA NA NA 11 (85) (82) 11 (85) (82) 85 69 15 NA NA NA
Laisne 29 18 (62) 5/6 with isolated skin (83) 4 (14) NA 20 (69) 15/20 (75) 22 (76) 16/22 (72) 72.4 65.5 NA 27.6 69 41
Meng 3 6 (50) (100) 9 (75) (78) 8 (67) (87) 6 (50) 5/6 (83) 83.3 58.3 0 17 NA NA
Moiseev 17 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 75 63 25 NA 20 53
Mozo 8 1 (12) (100) 0 NA 7 (87) 6/7 (86) (100) (87.5) 87.5 37 12 NA 28 NA
Yang 17 NA NA NA NA NA NA 13 (76) NA 64.7 29.4 0 35 28 (to best resp) NA
Wei 4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 86.9 56.5 13 NA 5 NA
Marcuzzi 6 NA NA NA NA NA NA 2 (33) (100) 100 100 NA NA 21 NA

CR complete remission, G gut, L liver, N. number, NA not applicable, NR non response, OR overall response, ORR overall response rate, S skin, TF treatment failure, TTCR time to complete response TTR, time to response.